• ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Steam is the very, very rare case of a major company that is both not beholden to shareholders, and has a pretty good guy at the helm.

  • D06M4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I only buy games on Steam, GOG and ItchIO. The main reason I don’t give a cent to stores from EA, Ubisoft or Epic Games anymore is their services and terms are horrible. I’m all in for supporting competition when it’s good competition.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I would buy from GOG too, if they provided Linux support in form of an official launcher. And if available also official Linux builds. Back in the days GOG did that, but they stopped doing it. And before someone comes after me, I know there are alternative launchers on Linux. But I don’t want to give GOG money for work others doing it for free. I don’t want support a company who only cares about Windows.

      • Sidyctism II.@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        45 seconds ago

        I could understand this sentiment for any pc-platform but GOG. After all, they are the only ones (afaik) that make their launcher optional. And while i do ocassionally use launcher-functionalities from for example steam, i would much rather not have to bother with it if i didnt have to.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        In the past, before Proton, if a game was available at comparable prices on GOG and on Steam, I’d buy it on GOG, also because no DRM meant better compatibility. After Proton, my purchases from GOG went way down.

        • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          This does not address the issue I brought up in my reply. Besides the brought up point, it would not solve all other issues I would have. I know the functionality to add non-Steam games since I am on Steam over 12 years ago.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Oh cool then just be a prick about it for no reason. Go fuck yourself, I was just trying to help you.

            • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I told you that it does not address my issue. No need to be mad, I have no bad intentions. I expressed what issue I have and adding the game as a non-Steam game does not solve the issues I have.

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                It came off as hostile but maybe I misread.

                How does it not fix the problem? You can buy a gog game, add it to Steam and launch it with Proton. You’d just be using Steam instead of the gog launcher you want.

      • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I bought Resident Evil 0 on GOG yesterday but Heroic wouldn’t download the game for some reason (stuck at 0%). Refunded, got it on Steam for cheaper and it launched right away.

        Sometimes I purchase on GOG out of principle and for some reason they always punish me for it.

  • cosmicpancake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    138
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Larian isn’t wrong, Steam mostly works. Stable client, refunds, workshop, Proton, massive userbase and tools that actually help developers and players. A lot of other stores still feel half-baked next to that.

    But deserved != harmless. Valve has way too much power, discovery is a dumpster fire, and their communication and policy decisions can be arbitrary. Dominance like that rewards sloppiness and makes it harder for better alternatives to gain traction.

    So yeah, Steam earned its place, but I do not want any one company owning PC gaming. Competition keeps them honest, and right now we need more real contenders, not just storefronts throwing money at exclusives.

    • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Looking at how other tech areas have all consolidated into monopolies or oligopolies, valve is the best case scenario for PC gaming.

      Imagine anyone else being in control. Activision? EA? Ubisoft? The gaming industry is not immune from disgusting money hungry corporations stepping on the users to squeeze out every little penny they can. Valve has never done this and has kept others in check for the longest time. The day we lose the current version of Valve will be disastrous for the industry, I’m pretty sure.

      • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I think you might reconsider what qualifies as “best case scenario” if you end that statement with “when this thing goes, it’s taking the industry with it”. Like, best out of a bad bunch, for sure, but the best possible outcome?

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Is discovery a dumpster fire? I mean sure it could be better but I dont think its a dumpster fire. It seems there are constantly new small team indie games doing wild numbers on the platform. If discovery was truely bad we would be seeing the charts dominated by big studios.

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        As a player, I feel like discovery is great. I found literally dozens of interesting games just by scrolling down the main page.

        I don’t know how it’s for devs, but it’s probably all but impossible to get traction if you’re just throwing your game in there, Fests being a compromised solution to an impossible problem

        • IronBird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          i kinda wish we had greenlit, there’s so much shovelware assetflip shit…lotta crap to wade through to find the good stuff.

          but greenlit itself is probably worse in the longrun, maybe they should just increase the cost to post a game (that deposit is refunded after certain number of sales, iirc). larger deposit would make it less lucrative to throw out shit

      • Deconceptualist@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The regular Next Fests have probably been the single best thing for game discovery I’ve found in s long time. Nothing beats an actual hands-on demo for deciding if I’ll wishlist a game.

      • stephen01king@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I guess he talking about the search system, which is a dumpster fire relative to other Steam features.

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Are we using the same product? There’s a vast array of quality tags that seem to genuinely work to find stuff?

          • stephen01king@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            You can’t filter using more than one tag as an “and” filter, only “or”. That’s pretty basic for a filter feature, isn’t it? It’s just surprising given how well implemented other Steam features had been in my experience.

            • Fizz@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              He wasnt talking about search it was about algorithmic recommendation.

              But you can filter by multiple tags. When you click search select the advanced search at the bottom of the dropdown. It does all the things you mention and far more

              • asmoranomar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Mr biggest problem with tags is that it’s user curated and you can recommend an unlimited number of them.

                Just because a game has a few funny moments, doesn’t mean it gets the comedy tag. Just because it has a brief driving sequence doesn’t mean it gets the racing tag. Just because there’s some reading involved doesn’t mean you get the visual novel tag.

                It’s getting to the point I feel like there’s a conspiracy where there’s teams of people intentionally sabotaging the tag system and teams trying to counter it, all so they can control views and sales. It’s really noticeable when a publisher stops marketing and moves to another release.

                • Grey Cat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  I don’t think you can create new tags can you ? At least I have not seen a place to do that.

                  But I do also think that there could be more specific tags.
                  And yeah, being able to AND / OR would be hella good.

                  However, I would not describe it as a dumpster fire, it’s pretty good all things considered.

    • Tywèle [she|her]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Competition keeps them honest, and right now we need more real contenders, not just storefronts throwing money at exclusives.

      Then the competition should put in the work.

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s hard to do when Steam has all but cornered the market. Say what you will about Epic’s ineptitude, but even investing billions, the publisher of the biggest game ever can’t break into the market. Now imagine how hard it’d be for a smaller player.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The epic launcher is a fucking piece of shit. It being a bloated unreal application to serve as a glorified web browser does not help at all

        • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Epic can’t break into the market because of their own shitty launcher, not because of anything Steam has done to lock down the competition.

          Now imagine how hard it’d be for a smaller player.

          Not very hard, if they were willing to create a decent launcher and engage in sustainable business practices (and regional pricing).

          • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            I sincerely doubt that even if another launcher did everything Steam does, it would rival it without huge amounts of money being thrown around. People already use Steam.

            And that’s assuming they get to this point, ignoring that Steam had decades to get there. It used to be ass.

            • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Not every company can pull it off, but I’m certain if Epic had invested in their launchers it could have worked.
              A few years in and their launcher has stagnated completely

            • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I sincerely doubt that even if another launcher did everything Steam does, it would rival it. People already use Steam.

              At that point, you can start grabbing business from steam via promotions and such. You don’t need to rival or outgrow Steam to break into the market, you just need a bit of the market.

              And that’s assuming they get to this point, ignoring that Steam had decades to get there. It used to be ass.

              It’s not even that other launchers have less features than Steam. It’s just that other than GoG, which has a very limited catalog and no regional pricing, there is not a single store that is not actively anti-consumer to a hilarious extent.

        • qevlarr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          There being a barrier to entry isn’t Steam’s fault. If someone comes and makes a competitor launcher and storefront that is just as good, people can easily switch. Both developers and customers. Nobody is locked in

      • Honytawk@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The competition is at work, but too many fanboys blindly bashing on anything that isn’t Steam is making it very hard for them.

        • qevlarr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Steam took years and years earning customers trust slowly but surely. Why would we greet Epic, EA, Ubisoft, Blizzard with anything other than suspicion?

        • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The only competition is GOG and they will never succeed with DRM free for the big AAA. Epic succeeding is the worst case scenario

    • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      11 hours ago

      As long Valve doesn’t become publicly traded they will be fine. The problems start when companies optimize for shareholder value rather than customer value.

      • cmhe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Na. Even privatly traded companies can enshittify when it gets inherited to people not sharing the same vision as the one that made the company successful.

        If you want to prevent enshittification more long term, convert it to a non-profit cooperative, with a work ethic that promotes providing the best service over short term profit.

      • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        So tencent or a saudi prince buys them and it will be fine guyyyyssss haha

        Nothing ever bad happens under private ownership either right?

      • Honytawk@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You think there aren’t a bunch of greedy finance whores biding their time until Gabe dies in order to take over and enshitify everything so they can squeeze as much money out of Steam as possible?

      • ook@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Well yeah, that will be the potential first sign to look out for. If that happens no need to think it won’t get worse like everything else.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      He should turn it into a non-profit right before he dies and put the ip under a foundation or something so it can’t be sold off in pieces.

    • Davel23@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Maybe. I’ve heard Gabe’s son is set to take over when the time comes, hopefully he’s been raised right.

    • minorkeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      As soon as the business people gain control they will pivot everything to maximize profit. Enshitification is just a euphemism for business.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I feel like they’ve earned it because they’ve put in the most work. They are the best in the game because they make the user experience the best there is. EA, Ubisoft, and Microsoft have/had their own storefronts or launchers but they are clunky and unpleasant to deal with and the only benefits they had were exclusives. They’ve never put any effort into user experience and were mainly doing it to make themselves more money and it definitely showed. The only one that’s ever been a real competitor is Epic Launcher. And while it has gotten better over the years, the user experience is still not anywhere near Steam. And even now the Epic Launcher is still unpleasant to deal with in a lot of cases unless you just use it to play Fortnite.

    With Steam everything just works and is basically seamless. Not only that, before Steam the modding community for most games had an immense learning curve and most people just avoided it save for Minecraft. And as far as I can tell you can’t even mod games you buy on the Microsoft Store because their file structure is atrocious.

    The only storefront I wish was better/more popular was GOG. It’s not bad and has a lot of benefits (Like no DRM and offline installers), but Steam just makes everything so easy it’s hard not to get stuck with them once you’ve started.

    • leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Offline installers are the reason I only use my money on gog. I like to have control over the things I own, though it’s getting harder and harder these days. But where it’s still possible I use it, and gog is the only storefront that offers this service (which beats every other service I could think of).

    • dukemirage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The only storefront I wish was better/more popular was GOG. It’s not bad and has a lot of benefits (Like no DRM and offline installers), but Steam just makes everything so easy it’s hard not to get stuck with them once you’ve started.

      Well the no DRM/offline installer part is the most important part. I buy a game, I download and install it. If I need more features I may be better off with Steam anyway.

  • exu@feditown.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Devs are still free to sell their game outside of Steam and charge whatever price they want for that version

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Alan Wake 2 didn’t make its money back for a year despite being a huge game on the second-biggest service.

      Steam doesn’t care about other stores because other stores do not matter. They can let other stores sell Steam keys, and it still doesn’t threaten their untouchable market share.

    • Phineaz@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I think you’re not allowed to “sell” it for free with the same version and features. Which should be unsurprising.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 hours ago

    While many accuse Valve of monopolising the PC gaming market, others argue that Steam’s dominance is simply the result of doing things right.

    These assertions do not contradict. I cannot overstress that.

    This whole article is ‘Valve’s monopoly is fine because they did things right.’

    Having one good store is not, in itself, a problem. But it does mean we’re one fuckup away from having no good stores.

  • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 hours ago

    People feel good about Valve because they don’t rely on anti consumer behavior. It does what I want and doesn’t enforce me on other crap.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m a fan of Valve and Steam too. But you cannot deny that Valve does shitty stuff too. In example Valve is the company who either invented or popularized Loot Boxes. And they don’t do anything about the Black Market for the item trading and selling, such as Counter Strike skins and so on. And there are other little things that could be done, but nothing else upsets me as this.

      But besides that, for the most part I love Valve. The commitment to support on Linux is unmatched in the gaming world. As a private company, Valve can do whatever they want. I genuinely think that PC gaming wouldn’t be this good without Valve. If anything, Microsoft would have the power… which in an alternate universe people have to suffer.

  • ethaver@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I will say they were less weirdly invasive than whatever it was EA had me running just to play sims 2 in 2017ish. Why tf do you really need to protect you IP that hard for a game that old with newer sequels for???

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    So we’re acknowledging it’s a monopoly? Cool. Defense is still an acknowledgement. I’ve had the weirdest goddamn arguments with people insisting they’d never shop anywhere else, and if games aren’t on there it’s their own fault they’re doomed… but how dare anyone use the m-word! Obviously that can only mean one seller with absolute control, like how Standard Oil owned all 85% of the market.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The question is, is it a monopoly because they are doing something to force their way into that position, or does every other offering just suck?

      And what is the solution to said monopoly? Because as far as I can tell, the only way to give the other shitty stores a chance is to deliberately make the steam experience worse.

      There’s also the question of if this is even a real problem. For instance, if two people are trying to sell lemonade on their street, and one is just throwing a lukewarm cup of haphazardly crushed lemons at you for $2, and the other is charging $3 but giving you a cool glass of carefully squeezed lemons… the second one may have a monopoly, but that’s because the first isn’t competent. Should the second be punished in some way because of that?

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Saying it’s a monopoly doesn’t mean it needs solving. Anti-competitive behavior is a problem - but being a monopoly doesn’t require that abuse, and you don’t need a monopoly to exercise that abuse.

        Yet people get deeply fricking weird about saying it’s a monopoly.

        It’s naked taboo. It’s people feeling icky about a word, and actively refusing to engage in rational argument about meaning. When someone has dogmatically internalized that monopoly=bad and Steam=good, the text doesn’t matter. Even pointing out things they just said gets dismissed as some kind of attack against The Good Store.™

        We have to start from plain acknowledgement that Steam’s competitors do not matter. They are plentiful and irrelevant. Explaining why they are doesn’t change that they are.

      • Neshura@bookwyr.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 hours ago

        There should be case studies about the ineptitude of competing stores. A small handful aside who have found a niche and serve it well (itch.io and GOG come to mind) the other stores just dish out a store front that is under-cooked for what is there and lacking features beyond that and then are surprised when people prefer Steam.

        For example I’m not aware of a Workshop style system in any other store, so any game that features community made content will be a better experience on Steam.