Consider this example:
You have a road that forks and joins up again. You need to reach the end of this road and have a vehicle that takes you there without your input. At the fork, it will flip a coin and choose to either take the left fork or the right fork depending on the results. This agent is therefore stochastic. But no matter what it chooses, it’ll end up at the same place at the same time. Do you consider this to be automation?

With such a glaring oversight, I don’t know how I can trust the rest of this infographic.

If anything, eliminating cars would probably improve the roads since there will be much less wear and tear. People will still be walking there and want a good walking experience, so improvements will still happen.

70 billion parameters. It’s standard notation in the context of LLMs.

And if you’ve watched any of her content, you’d know her character is probably the farthest thing from dominant.

Was wondering the same thing. It looks very out of place. Maybe someone should edit it out.

Personal experiences

The language is awful. You can either do basic typesetting or meta-programming. There’s no in between.

How is their recommendation system?

It’s a practical thing. If you have no information on someone other than their looks and general demeanor, then how else would you decide who to get to know? If you already know them enough to have a gist of their personality, then looks would probably go way down the list for both men and women.

Removed by mod

It seems fairly on brand for AOC. Why should Israeli deaths be any more acceptable than Palestinian deaths?

AOC said she wants to send weapons to Israel using American taxpayer dollars so Israel can keep committing genocide.

Isn’t that the exact opposite of what she said in your screenshot? Support for defensive equipment and against offensive weapons.

I consider the arbitrary rules that we call formal English to just be the set of rules that lead to the most widely understood texts, so if you want to reach a broad audience, both across the world and across time, then keeping to those formal rules makes sense.

To me, “hello” communicates that you would like a verbal interaction and gives the opportunity to mentally switch gears for it before it actually begins. I appreciate that it exists.

I’ve always just used them where natural breaks would be if the sentence was spoken. I know how it’s supposed to be used and I’ll do it correctly when writing papers, but it hurts inside to see it that way. I don’t understand how it improves comprehension.

I don’t know if my autism has anything to do with it, but this is also my preferred dating format.

The presence of delicious garlic bread prompted you to reach for it.

I told you earlier that I don’t have numbers. My assessment is that the numbers you provided aren’t valid and I explained why in the last two comments. You can respond to those if you like. Repeating what you’ve said word for word does not add any new information. If you don’t want to continue the discussion, that’s fine, but if you have insight on why my reasoning might be wrong, I’d like to hear it.

Not even the slightest interest in figuring out the truth?