• lowleekun@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Overpaid morons. You could put them out of work right now and it would only be beneficial.

  • lowleekun@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Sausage will always remain a form. It is even more apparent in German you dumb Kackwürste.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “Our data shows that almost 70% of European consumers understand these names as long as products are clearly labelled vegan or vegetarian,”

    How fucking stupid are your customers if “almost 70%” can work out that a vegan sausage doesn’t contain meat?

    • urandom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      But honestly, the vegan sausages and steaks are not sausages and stakes, even if they are still ultra-processed like their meat counterparts. They really should invent different names that are used for these products.

      • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Why?

        I want something vegan that looks and tastes like sausage. I want to have an easy time finding such a product in the store. I look for a product that says “I’m basically a sausage, but vegan”. I buy a vegan sausage.

        What’s the problem with that?

        • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I am all for allowing vegan sausages to just be called sausage. But I am not the biggest fan of vegan steaks getring the same treatment. Mostly just because a steak is by definition a slice of meat. Patties are fine since they are just ground minced stuff made into a certain shape kinda like sausages.

          • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            52 minutes ago

            Don’t really care about steaks, but burgers, sausages and many others are really established with their veggie and vegan variants. It’s completely nonsensical to ban them.

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 minutes ago

              I mean you can just call the burgers “patties” which we do in my country anyway. Burger refers to the whole sandwich, not the patty. If they regulate the word “patty” to require meat, I hope farmers will drop cow patties at their doorsteps.

              Not a fan of them doing it to the word sausage though, it’s clearly a form factor above all else.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          How would they even define a sausage anyway, meat content? Well now blood sausage is not a sausage too despite being almost entirely animal product - probably more than most sausages actually given how much filler they put in them.

          Or shall we rename all the cheap sausages in shops to “emulsified high fat offal tubes” to more accurately describe them?

          • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            45 minutes ago

            And blood sausage is a very good example to show that “sausage” is an established appendix to show the shape of something, while specifying what it’s made of with a term beforehand. Pork sausage. Beef sausage. Turkey sausage. Blood sausage. This works so well that I can invent words of artificial things and still convey what I mean by that: Paper sausage. Ice sausage. Cloth sausage. Glass sausage. …Chickpea sausage. Broccoli sausage. Bean sausage.

            It’s a non-brainer. The legislators are being deliberately obtuse here.

          • khaleer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Or shall we rename all the cheap sausages in shops to “emulsified high fat offal tubes” to more accurately describe them?

            Nah, this would hurt meat lobbyist’ feelings.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    IIRC they suggested “tube” instead of “sausage”. So I guess we are now renaming them to tube dogs.

  • hotdogcharmer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Haha yeah awesome real problems getting solved by serious politicians here, guys! If you can actually get your hands on any real meat without paying an arm and a leg for it what the actual fuck are we doing here lads what the fuck are these fucking politicians doing???

    The world is on fire, the economy is in the shitter globally, there are multiple ongoing genocides, facism is on the rise again, and we’re wiggling our dicks around talking about whether you can call veggie burgers “burgers”? Are you serious? WHO CARES???

    Is this bring your kid to work day and they let the kids do a vote for a change instead as a treat? Is this a joke?? What motherfucker is getting into politics to make sure “hey those damn vegans better not call anything a burger”.

    These poncy little briefcase-botherers need a hobby or something because this is absolutely the biggest case of dicking around on the job I’ve ever heard of. Ridiculous. Stupid. A joke. Pathetic. Childish. Vapid. Can we get some adults in the EU Parliament please?

    • urandom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Or.

      We could tackle multiple problems at once. Why does it have to be a this-or-that thing?

      • Ibuthyr@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Because resources must be prioritized. There simply are more pressing matters to tend to.

        This is a non-issue and should have the lowest priority as it’s pandering to a lobby and will likely result in backfiring because more creative names will pop up, possibly leading to even more acceptance of vegan products 😁

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      why are they doing this shit when there are so many problems in the world?

      because they already participated in those problems.

      • bobzer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        In reality, it’s because the farming lobby is the biggest lobby inside the EU. This is an easy “win” that MEPs can use to get beef farmers to vote for them again.

        Same reason CAP will never be reformed.

  • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’m a french vegetarian living in France, and I couldn’t care less about this decision, the people arguing for either side are really wasting their time on this, who cares how it’s called honestly ? As long as the products are available in store and the labeling is different, which it always is, and very clearly: veggie based product try their best to make sure vegetarian and vegans will identify them easily and will know without a doubt that it is not meat. Who care that it is called a “burger”, “steak” or something else ?

    • MouldyCat@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I care that the government cares (or more specifically that it was bribed to do so by lobby groups)

      Vegetarian or not, you should care about this. Propping up the meat and dairy industry is not in the interests of the public. This move is part of an agenda by the meat and dairy industry to deceive the public into thinking there’s something “natural” about the modern meat processing industry. It’s bullshit and if we had a government that actually worked in our interests instead of that of the fat cats, it would be the meat and dairy industry being forced to change their labelling, to highlight to the public the real costs of meat consumption.

    • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’d like to add that “I know who cares” my question is rethoric, those who care are idiots wasting parliament’s time.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This is what seems crazy to me, surely no one is changing what they buy based on this and who is really so dumb that they were confused by the vegan sausage not containing meat?

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I doubt it’ll actually go through.

    They’re clearly labeled “veggie”, “vegitarian” or “vegan”, and consumers understand those labels to mean, at minimum, no meat.

    “Sausage”, I can see how you could argue it has to contain meat to be called a sausage. I don’t agree, but I can understand the argument being made.

    “Burger”, however. Is distinctly different than “hamburger”, in fact, we often substitute the prefix to fit whatever it is. (Not that hamburgers are made of ham, i know it comes from hamburg) Such as, “fish-burger” or “chicken-burger”, so why would “veggie-burger” be any more confusing than “fish-burger”?

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      16 hours ago

      “Sausage”, I can see how you could argue it has to contain meat to be called a sausage.

      I don’t; the defining feature of sausage isn’t that it’s meat, it’s the fact that it’s stuffed in a tube. If people want to grind up veggies and stuff them in a tube, why would that not be a veggie sausage?

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        If its just “sausage” alone I think there is an expectation that it contains about 10% Legally Meat™ though. Otherwise it should have some addition to its name to show it is something else.

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 hours ago

        grind up veggies and stuff them in a tube, why would that not be a veggie sausage?

        Salad dildo

      • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        “Sausage”, is a traditional name of minced meat stuffed into a sleeve, It exists in numerous cultures all over the world, and the principle is the same. So an argument could be made, that “Sausage” is inherently viewed as a meat product by default. And could be confusing for consumers.

        Again, I would also disagree with that argument, but that doesn’t mean it can’t be made. Just because we disagree with something doesn’t mean it can’t be made.

        I’ve never said something can’t be a “Veggie sausage”, like I said… It’s clearly labeled “Veggie”

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          It’s not just meat usually though.

          It’s a mix of mostly meat, some flour or even vegetables (like onion) and seasoning. Sometimes you can even have cheesy sausages.

          Some sausages here are as low as 11% of meat. Then again there is “product that’s comparable to meat” for a more significant portion, but rest flour and other things. You just can’t call minced ligaments and fat “meat” here but anyway I think sausages are more about the way they’re made and their shape than being made of meat

          • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I am well aware. You don’t have to convince me of what I already think. I just said an argument can be made given the long lineage of the name “Sausage” and its respective local counterpart.

            Regardless. Just to be super clear. As far as I’m concerned, EU can fuck off with this one, it’s not something that needs to be regulated on an EU level. Each member is perfectly capable of deciding themselves what can and can not be called “Sausage”.

            This is just France trying to throw its weight around to appease their own farmers. Why they wanted to involve EU in it is beyond me.

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Language is descriptive not prescriptive.

              If “veggie sausage” conveys what I mean, then it’s perfectly acceptable language.

              The only reason there’s even a question about this is because the meat industry is panicking.

    • tron@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Its not always clearly labeled tho. Last year my brother took me to a burger joint in Minneapolis and only after I thought the burger tasted very weird did I learn that it was an all vegan burger joint. Not complaining, but it should be clearly labeled what youre getting, IMO.

        • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          You’re just making a really terrible, bad faith argument, for the sake of arguing, when the guy just wanted to share a situation where he was a bit confused as to what he was getting.

          • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            I would just enjoy having animal abuse products be labeled clearly but sure, you know me better than I know myself I guess?

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It should always be the case, even for places serving meat products. Alpha-gal syndrome is on the rise due to exploding tick populations, so when a restaurant advertises “gravy” it would be nice to know what kind it is. Another frustrating one is sausages - so many poultry or veggie sausages still use pig-based casings and either ignore it completely or list the ingredient as “collagen” and expect people to understand what that implies (collagen casing is almost always pork).

      • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I think I know the place you’re talking about. I took my daughter there because she is vegetarian, but I can imagine that being offputting if you didn’t know ahead of time.

  • Greddan@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I guess the most commonly used word to describe a poop in Swedish can’t be used anymore. Bajskorv, or poop sausage.

    This decision is beyond stupid and smells of corruption. Sausage, burger etc. have been used to describe the shape of things for decades. I could agree that plant beef, or halumi pork would be an issue, but not this.

  • BigAssFan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Should name products made from animals as they are: spherical gassed pig after a short, miserable life without ever seeing daylight. Or: salty fat from methane burping cows that could also have fed their killed off offspring.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      salty fat from methane burping cows that could also have fed their killed off offspring.

      Who eats suet and why have you made it salty? I’d think “salty fat” would be closer to bacon.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Well I’m sorry to say but I think you just won’t be able to come up with anything that would deter someone.

    • Kornblumenratte@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Oh – care what you write! A sandwich as designed by the late Lord Sandwich himself is a slice of salted beef stacked between two slices of bread. Calling some vegan abomination “sandwich” is an insult to British cooking traditions. Brits are not amused if you insult their tradition. Don’t risk not amusing the mighty Britons!

      /s, just in case.

  • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Can we change the title to “meat industry has been nagging about this non issue for years now, so the babies are finally getting their non issue resolved?”

    Ffs sell your product but don’t be a bitch about that tiny speck of competition.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      19 hours ago

      that tiny speck of competition.

      It’s not that tiny anymore. The number of people choosing non-meat options is growing faster and faster as people realize that meat is expensive and bad for your health but the plant based alternatives are cheaper and good for you.

      • businessfish@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        yes but lets not pretend impossible burgers are a health food. they’re great but just like cow burgers i wouldn’t recommend eating them as a staple of your diet

      • BigAssFan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Also bad for your health in the long run, because meat is heating up the atmosphere and outcompetes nature that would otherwise store CO2.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      This is going to backfire in a major way for them. Once we come up with new names for the vegan stuff that are generally accepted, the old stuff will look decidedly outdated.

        • MouldyCat@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          they know what they’re doing - they’re trying to create an artificial distance between meat and modern plant alternatives. Can’t blame them for trying but the government should not be so happy to do their bidding.