• thevoidzero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Ostracizing used to work because we needed community. Now they will just go on the Internet and find hundreds if not thousands pro approve what they’re doing.

    And whatever the “village” did for a person can be bought with money. And people don’t really do free work for you anyway, maybe your immediate family but that’s about it. So people are more and more individualistic.

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The balls of someone bringing their side piece to a BBQ. There are families and friends that wouldn’t call out that shit? I mean I get one or two but a whole BBQ of ppl?

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Also, if you’ve ever said “how I raise my kids is my business”, you might be a shit parent

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This is a victimizer’s mentality. Abuser’s rationalize their bad behavior by internalizing the idea that everyone behaviors as badly as they do, so it’s only fair. Cheaters think everyone is cheating. Child abusers believe everyone is a closeted child abuser. Wallstreet bros think every would sell their mother for a quick buck…

  • KassioAug@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    That’s a stupid take. If you ‘normalize shaming’ (which, to be fair, is quite common nowadays unfortunately) for things you don’t agree with, you will make your own life miserable, and people will hate you for a good reason.

    Sure you should talk to friends and family when you see them acting problematic, nothing wrong with that. But shaming people for things you THINK you understand (when you most certainly don’t) is the fastest way to push people away.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      “side piece” being problematic in itself, there are many who would use this wrongly.

      A family who sees someone with a partner they don’t approve of, the extremely religious not accepting divorce/remarriage etc

      • WaxRhetorical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Don’t worry, a lot of these people are already very vocal about this, they don’t need some post online to start being shitty.

    • qevlarr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Exactly. Ethics can differ. Of course you can say something privately if there is a real problem, but this is some 1950s bullshit I don’t want to go back to

      • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        dude the '50s people just gossipied behind eachothers backs, and hid any problematic behaivor under a rug so no one found out.

        Their silence on real issues is why generational trauma keeps going.

        what you mean go back to that shit? calling it out is the exact opposite of the fifties.

        • qevlarr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Yes, that’s true, but I meant about restrictive social norms. One person’s reprehensible norm breaking is another person’s struggle for recognition. But you’re right, publicly calling out stuff is not what I meant

    • Chris Lowles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      And isn’t the entire internet just a giant indifferent shaming machine now? Like I get the desire to right wrongs and whatnot but it’s not like the general consensus around cheating or being a deadbeat is positive.

    • GardenGeek@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Shame was from the beginning of man kind one of the most powerful tools of the community/ society to hedge in antisocial behaviors.

      This being said there first needs to be sentient consensus on what is anti social behavior shared within the affected community… and that’s what we’re apparently lacking currently. Robbing millions of americans of the means to life peaceful and fullfilling lives and raping kids seems to acceptable to at least a third of the population.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    1 day ago

    I do this with Trump supporters in my family.

    Not trump voters, Trump supporters. To this day, they don’t regret their vote, and they actively support.

    Human garbage.

        • EnchiladaRaisins@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          They have already had three chances to vote for him. Anyone who voted for him in 2016 is a forgivable idiot. Anyone who voted for him in 2020 approves of everything he did in his first term. Anyone who voted for him in 2024 approves of everything he did in his first term AND approves of what happened on January 6th. Voting for him or supporting him after that is not forgivable.

    • FerrisEuler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Starting fights is an easy way to get tossed in jail A lot of people just need to calm T.F. down or maybe just go talk to a doctor and get some prescription pills to make them less antisocial

        • Tooks@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          You’re correct. I’ve been to jail, and I have prescriptions for mental health. Your point, sir?

          FTD, MAGArds, and the Gang of Pedophiles (GOP). If you support any of this nonsense, you’re human garbage. It’s that easy. If you don’t support it, yet give someone shit for their comments about people who do support it, well…

          This is a variation of something overused to the point of cliche, but… There’s a table of 11 Nazis having dinner. They ask you to join them and you oblige. There are now 12 Nazis having dinner at the table.

          • forbiddencherry@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            33 minutes ago

            The absolute certainty on Lemmy that the far left opinion is the only allowable opinion on any topic (that your comment exudes in spades) has actually been very useful to me. For many years I’d started to side more and more with liberal and even some leftist ideas, but Lemmy has been a wakeup call, that I need to examine a lot of that much more critically. I’m not MAGA and I’m not leftist, they’re both extremist hate groups. Having a difference of opinion doesn’t make the other person a Nazi or human garbage. You write and act just like the racist far right that would post Obama ape memes, but from the other side. No I don’t expect you or anyone else on here to be able to be able to admit that right now, because you’re too far gone and are a self reinforcing cult bubble. I do hope that at least some people on here someday can wake up and realize “Oh I was really certain about so many things, but now I realize the world is a much more complex and nuanced place. I was wrong. I spread hate and made the world a worse place, but maybe I can do better.”

  • EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think the expectation that you cut off your friends when they do something you don’t like is a little out of control though… I’ve definitely lost friends over the way they treat their children but there are some steps before that imo.

  • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    I can’t even imagine NOT saying a LOT of stuff if someone in my family I knew was in a monogamous relationship brought someone they were cheating with to a family function. I’d immediately tell on them then tell them I told on them right after and if they didn’t leave right away I’d be grilling them both until they did, what else even is there to do?? Just sit there and act like it’s normal? How??

    • FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Certain members of my family would come after me for “causing trouble” if I called someone out like that. They’d be like “you should really deal with that sort of thing privately. Like yes he was in the wrong but you could’ve handled that better.” Luckily, the rest of my family would then go after those certain family members for saying that

      Point is, a lot of people were raised with tbe mentality that they need to preserve the family dignity and image and calling out someone for doing something objectively wrong is worse bc it calls even more attention to it. Getting out of that mentality is difficult. Still fucked up tho

      Edit for clarity

        • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          It seem backwards right? But my mothers side is like this. its a different line of thinking.

          They were mad when I told on my stepfather for molesting my sister. Like, both familes were mad at me for getting my sister out of a really dangerous sistuation. He might have killed her had I not spoken up. It was bad bad. And my whole ass family responded by not trusting me anymore, and treating me even more like shit. Why?

          Because at least on my mothers side, they had been hiding my grandfathers transgressions which included raping his daughters decades prior. Took me a decade to work it out. Thats why they didnt trust me. I expose secrets that harm people, secrets they didnt want revealed about the family, and heaven forbid you protect your children, the neighbors might gossip. Its a paralell to a pig with lipstick on. But as long as everyone only sees the lipstick, they can go on being pigs. They believe the lie, because the lie is outwardly appearing as truth.

          and everyone goes along with the lie that things are “normal and fine” until a truth teller comes. then they hate you for disturbing thier truth (lie).

    • iceonfire1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not all ppl in an open relationship agree on what it is though. Ethical non-monogamy and cheating treat ppl very differently and I reserve my right to shame accordingly.

      • scops@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Who the hell is bringing their DL mistress to a family barbecue? If she’s there, there is no stinking way his wife doesn’t know about it.

        If the wife doesn’t approve of it then yeah, he’s pressing the self destruct button on his marriage and bringing drama into a space it doesn’t belong, but I think it’s way more likely she knows what’s up and is cool with it.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      “You just want an open relationship so you have an excuse to cheat!”

      • person who doesn’t think about things or understand them
      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s only cheating if it’s not a part of the plan, whether it’s a relationship or anything else.

        In go fish, lying about what you have in your hand is cheating. In a closed book exam, using your notes is. Nobody says that people want to play a bluffing game or take an open-book exam because they want to cheat. At most, people will say that someone wants those things because they will perform better under those circumstances, which, while not phrased well, is also true of poly people in monogamous relationships (and very much vice versa- especially for monogamous people who can only conceive of polyamory as cheating), no? It’s not a choice to be polyamorous, and people who are won’t be as fulfilled by a monogamous relationship.

        That doesn’t mean they’ll cheat on a monogamous partner, because that is a choice (and frankly, I suspect poly people are less likely to cheat than monogamous people because of the emotional work they’ve already done to realize that they’re poly- I only know one poly person who is a serial cheater, and that’s because he refuses to do any of the required emotional labor to make enm work, so he does just continually get into “monogamous” relationships; whereas I know many monogamous people who are currently or were previously serial cheaters).

        Additionally, just as looking at your opponent’s cards or your classmate’s answers are still cheating in bluffing games and open book tests, dating or romantically/sexually interacting with someone outside of what is agreed upon in a poly relationship is still cheating. Poly people don’t have an excuse to cheat at all, and in fact have a greater responsibility not to, given the larger number of people whose health depends on their transparency.

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Both is good. If you’re poly, you can say that. By bringing a different date from your spouse, you are essentially outing yourself as poly already, you should expect questions if the group you’re doing this with doesn’t know, especially if it’s family you’re close to (I’m assuming they are at least in steady contact, given that they’re having family parties).

      I can’t really imagine one of my siblings bringing someone other than their spouse to a family party, but I’d have some questions for sure. I also love and trust my siblings, so if they told me their relationship was open, I’d believe them and fully accept their polyamory. I’d probably be confused that they wanted to come out like that, but I wouldn’t have an issue with it. Once enough time had passed for them to be secure that I really accepted them, I’d probably ask why, but I wouldn’t be mad no matter what they said, even if they didn’t want to explain it.

      If they were cheating on their spouses, I would not accept that, unless they were in a long term abusive situation and trying to escape. Otherwise, I would leave if it weren’t my house and ask them to leave if it were.

  • bizarroland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Okay, but only for reprehensible behavior. Don’t shame them because they’re poor or because they’re having mental health issues.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Cutting someone off isn’t holding them accountable.

    Are we seriously suggesting it is? This is slacktivism at it’s finest.

    • ddplf@szmer.info
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      23 hours ago

      slacktivism

      I came mentally unprepared for another piece of internet lingo

  • hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    24 hours ago

    People, especially idiot chuds, are rarely so self-reflective as to think they’ve lost a friend because of something they’ve done. Usually they’ll blame everyone around them for everything for their whole lives.

    Shame relies not just on one person calling you out, but everyone calling you out.