• tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It seems that 385 being hazardous means 800* should have a different rating? Unless the scale is really large, I guess.

  • spectre [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    There are some really amazing pictures of Beijing and other cities not that they are getting decent air quality a lot of the time

  • pillowtags@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    So China’s air quality was…what? Just fine? Derp derp? Shitty air quality anywhere is bad for anybody who lives there, but it seems like you’re absolving China because somebody else also fucked up…

    • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      The problem isn’t that China actually had good air quality, the problem (besides that China, as the manufacturing hub of the west, being blamed is acting as a sin-eater rather than representing real critique) is that in one case it’s a problem that is considered characteristic and an indictment of the whole society while in the case of America that’s just one city’s problem and it’s just the way things are.

      I’m sure your familiar with this in other contexts even with China, where they do something bad and we need to mention it every time the PRC comes up but America does something bad and it’s aw shucks but it’s in the past now and it was a different time etc. etc. or it’s in the present but it’s actually Russia’s fault or the Republican’s fault or a DINO’s fault or whatever. When they do something bad, it’s a reflection of their fundamentally evil character, and when America does something bad, it was an exception to or merely a shortcoming in its essentially beneficent character. Clumsy giant and all that.

    • Krem [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      China, the north especially, had bad air quality due to many things like rural people burning firewood and coal during the winter, dust storms, rapid urbanisation (and a sudden increase in car use) and less-well-regulated heavy industry during the more liberal late 90’s and early 2000s.

      most of those things have been reversed. China has the best air quality in east Asia probably, and I don’t think you’ll find a major world city of over 10 million people that has better air quality than a chinese megacity. for example Taipei, so beloved by liberals, has air quality much worse than any city in the mainland