• Widdershins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I would like to hear about a 3+ hour movie that spends the first two hours in the desert or savanna and then the last hour somewhere with a lot of waterfalls and running water with jump scares.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The Brutalist had a 20 min intermission. It was very welcome. Theaters should totally encourage it, the line for concessions during intermission was crazy.

      • Pringles@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I went to an opera a couple of days ago and was very pleasantly surprised about the extended breaks. It actually makes it so much more of an event, not to mention that nobody was rushing to the bathroom because the breaks were like 30 minutes each (between each act they redo the decor on the set). It also gave you plenty of time to grab a bite to eat and a drink.

      • dunyol@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 hours ago

        In my country (also Western Europe), we only get them if a film passes the three hour mark. We saw the extended versions of the LOTR trilogy a few months back and they were a lifesaver for a quick bathroom break!

    • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wonder if the studios said they can’t have them anymore. Would be cool if a theater brought them back. Probably have tons of people just leave when the movie is bad.

      • CombatWombat@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have to assume it’s studios – movie theaters make most of their money selling concessions, and intermissions are great for that.

      • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Not sure why the studio would care if people left after intermission, they’ve already paid full price.

        • Janx@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          All those intermissions would add up. They wouldn’t be able to show as many movies per day…

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      No and some movies are 3 plus hours. The last one I saw with an intermission was the brutalist and it helped me enjoy the movie a lot more.

      I know Scorsese said he didn’t like them or something but I didn’t go see killers of the flower moon in theaters because no intermission on a 4 hour movie is not my jam.

      • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think he has a point actually.

        A lot of times the break is inserted in a random moment, regardless if that falls in the middle of a scene. And also if you take too long you’ll definitely miss a bit of the movie.

          • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Yeah, but then every movie would have a cliffhanger in the middle, or even just a clean cut into two halves that would limit a director’s artistic freedom.

            Plus I bet cinemas have to break movies differently based on what else is playing so the bathrooms and concessions stands don’t get overwhelmed by more than one screening going there at once.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Uncreative people whine about “artistic freedom.” People that are actually creative would find a way to make the movie better.

              • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 hours ago

                It was not cable, but I distinctly remember the worst part of watching movies on TV as a kid with my dad. All the channels would cram a commercial break right before the last 10/15 minutes of a movie, prompting my dad to declare it was too late for us to be up and turning the TV off for the night.

                I don’t blame my dad, he was probably tired and just wanted to get some sleep, but I do blame the greedy TV channels for sure!

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Actually, this is probably a reason they don’t do many intermissions. I remember lines in bathrooms being bad enough at the end of movies, when no one is in a rush to get back, because the bathrooms aren’t big enough to quickly handle the rush from even just a single screen. They’d probably have to deal with more fights and irate customers with intermissions vs just keeping the movie going and letting people just go and miss some when they need to.

              • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                21 hours ago

                It works in other countries.

                Not everyone needs to pee during the intermission. Some people go pee, some get some more popcorn or whatever, some go for a smoke.

          • jaybone@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I took a screenwriting class in college, which taught when writing for tv how to structure around commercials like acts in a play, build and resolve suspense, etc.

            I’m sure movie directors would hate that, as it would stifle their creativity.

        • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I worked at a theater when Return of the King released, there were audible groans in every showing after the 3rd or 4th fade to black then up on another scene after it had already been 3 hours

  • Nulubez@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I recall seeing Dances with Wolves in the movie theater and that was the last US major release i can recall that had a built in intermission

    • OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Movie theatres should have this implemented. Like some dim light by the exit would shine when it’s a good time for a toilet break.

    • Bev's Dad@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The most worth it surcharge for a movie ever! Even gives you a summary of what’s happening and notifies you with vibrations just before a pee break and with an OLED screen you can see the countdown without lighting up the entire place.

    • OhShitSon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      When we saw it the theatre actually had an intermission about halfway through, it was very much needed.

    • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      interestingly, I’ve been to two theaters like this before!

      and I can’t fuckin remember where either of them were because I was a clueless kid and didn’t realize how mindbogglingly rare they were. somewhere in OH, PA, or NJ since those are the states I spent the most time in as a kid 🤷‍♀️

      I feel like I remember seeing something on the internet about bathroom stalls with screens in them playing the film, but maybe that was clickbait idk. seems like it would make screen recording too easy