source: Bellablackbrabbit on rednote

  • Pastaguini [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    Someone posted this on Reddit and one of the comments was something like “love seeing the celebration of two resistance badasses in this image: this kid and Barack Obama

    • Egonallanon@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      Kid in a school was walking around shouting “I support ICE” and filming it. Kid in the picture walked up told him he was gonna deck him, guy said he’ll get in trouble for it so the kid said “okay” and decked him.

        • Johnny_Arson [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It failed because it lacked a vanguard. It was ideologically incoherent and had everyone from frustrated radlibs to weird libertarians and some of the loosely organized left. It could not have succeeded because there was no cohesive ideology holding the movement together. It was an infarction point of the working class and they had no framework to succeed. Our job is to make sure that the next time it happens we can guide that energy and concentrate it into a revolutionary mass.

          Source: I was there

          • alyqz@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            It also scared the Epstein class and they brought out the counter terrorism units. I’ve started wondering if this scared them into astroturfing the alt right.

          • Juice@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            It was very individualistic. Its also incredible to me that it took 5 years to mount a vaguely recognizable movement to take action after the economy crashed and the bankers got huge bonuses for crashing it. That’s one of the signs that we are further along as a movement, although we def have a long way to go.

            • Johnny_Arson [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              Chalk another one up for the Marxist-Leninists being right. I still remain an anarchist at heart but I take very seriously the “by any means necessary” part in my pfp

            • Johnny_Arson [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Like physically? No lol. I just remember when it first appeared. I just assumed it was something from his campaign team. Also what is this about 1905? What does the Potemkin have to do with this lol?

        • Johnny_Arson [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I mean I was skeptical of course but I did vote for him because at least at the time he was promising to shut down guantanmo which was only a few years old at that point. He also promised to prosecute Bush for war crimes. Of course we all knew both of those were long shots but his campaign was more revolutionary than even Bernie in 2016.

          The best thing about '08 was a lot of us learned a hard lesson. Electoralism is a dead end and political power grows from the barrel of a gun.

          This is a message to all of you on either side of the Mamdani thing too. It does not fucking matter, he might do some good for NY he might not. None of that matters in the big picture and getting so wrapped up in electoralism makes me want to kind-vladimir-ilyich

          • MayoPete [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I want to do everything in my power to eliminate the Republicans. That group is responsible for so much pain in my life. They are a cancer on our society and they’re never going to be on our side.

          • MayoPete [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            The problem I have with this right now is there are some truly repugnant people running for office. Like people that are doing awful things to our trans friends. I’m not saying that Democrats are even good on this issue, but it feels like a betrayal to not participate in trying to get rid of these bigots.

          • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            There’s something fundamentally incoherent in pretending electoralism is a dead end while armed revolt is on the table for the American left, that couldn’t be further from the truth, there is no extant American Workers Party to organize armed workers and the US military body is still cohesive and massive

            Armed revolt is a viable tool for the Third World, not the Western left. The American masses are electoralist in political mode and outlook which means the left must be there to contest that ground; otherwise they’ll fall for fascism

            • Johnny_Arson [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              There’s something fundamentally incoherent in pretending electoralism is a dead end while armed revolt is on the table for the American left

              I don’t believe either of these things are true tbh. There is certainly usefulness in electoralism on a case by case basis but not as any revolutionary strategy. I think at best we can mitigate harm by building parallel power as the empire declines and cannibalizes itself.

    • miz [any, any]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      yeah it’s the English name of the company that they chose. literal translation is “Little Red Book” but that is too heavily connoted for a western audience

        • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          i know a nato anarchist who thinks they named it after that but is too ignorant to realize the chinese name of mao’s little red book is something else so that doesn’t make sense as a name for what was intended as a domestic service.

        • miz [any, any]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          it’s programmed into the boomers but they really dialed back the “Chicom” scare stuff in the mid-to-late 70s. let’s just say America’s gerontocracy would not like it