• Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The bears definitely took notice of the drone. The animals’ heart rate skyrocketed when the UAV flew overhead, and their stress response was stronger when the quadcopter flew in windy conditions that masked the sound of its approach — apparently bears do not like being surprised. One bear started moving faster after the quadcopter flew by. And the bear that had experienced the greatest increase in heart rate — from 41 beats per minute to 162 — moved nearly 7 kilometers in the next 28 hours, encroaching into a neighboring female’s territory.

    All in all, though, the bears weren’t stressed all that much, the researchers concluded.

    🤌

    At least there is this:

    Ditmer’s team says that their results reinforce the NPS ban on drones in parks.

  • Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Is this an issue for the average bear? Or is it more of an air traffic bear thing?

  • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    What about a cars with 500k lumen headlights and the ability to go faster than anything you’ve ever seen without even having legs?

    • scratchee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Tldr: drones/uavs spook bears, probably not a good tool for bear based science, or indeed for anyone else to observe bears.

      • flora_explora@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Not only that, but probably a lot more animals are stressed out by them. They just reported on the bears because they studied their response. But we should generally come up with guidelines or rules when or if people are allowed to fly drones in nature.