• Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly.

      It’s not accusing the being gay of fucking them up, it’s accusing the unhealthy repression.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Gay people in denial are still gay though. If they weren’t, they wouldn’t be in denial

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not closeted people, just those in denial. If you’re in the closet, that means you’re scared of coming out, whereas someone who’s in denial has some unhealthy reason to want to not be gay that leads them to hate that part of themselves.

        • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          ahh, so much better

          How about we just attack homophobic people for being homophobic, instead of using gay as an insult in a roundabout way of calling them a hypocrite?

          • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            As a queer person I never understood this

            They are not being attacked for being gay. They are specifically attacked for being homophobic.

            TERFS are also not being attacked for being women, nor is attacking TERFS an attack against all women either.

            Attacking someone who’s bi or homosexual in denial and overcompensating that with hatred says absolutely nothing about gay people as a whole, or implies in any way that being gay is problematic.

            And to be completely honest here, it feels kinda presumptuous the way this is being argued. Almost like it shouldn’t be allowed to criticise someone gay for any reason at all. Queer people are a very diverse group of people and obviously we have assholes, too. It’s not doing anyone a favor if we act like that’s impossible.

            • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              19 hours ago

              They are specifically attacked for being homophobic.

              No, they are attacked for (assumingly) being gay

              • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Maybe you and I are having different conversations then. I’ve never experienced it being taken this way.

                • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  I’ve never experienced it being taken this way

                  But you have, that’s what the entire discussion is about.

                  • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 hours ago

                    No, it’s about the misunderstanding that it might be meant this way. I don’t think most commenters here are actually homophobic.

                    But look, obviously I can’t know for sure how other people mean it when they say it, but I can when I’m the one talking.

                    I’m bisexual. Bisexuality is a normal and beautiful part of the spectrum of human sexuality, and anyone who has something against it is a certified moron.

                    I personally think that many homophobic people are bisexual (or gay) and in horrible, hateful denial.

                    I don’t think their queerness is to blame, but specifically their harmful behavior. I don’t think their queerness is the reason either, but nothing but good old sexism and heteronormativity. I still think that their queerness is part of an explanation, since it leads them to this horrible internal misunderstanding that sexuality is a choice. I don’t think all homophobes are queer, obviously some are straight, but I think it’s a significant portion of the most spiteful and publicly active ones. And again, them being (allegedly) queer is not what’s problematic about them in the slightest. It’s their homophobic behaviour.

                    I’ve yet to see an example of someone who actually blames homosexuality or the queer community for homophobia in this argument, just people claiming that this is what’s somehow happening.

          • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            I just wish there was a clean way to diss them for weaponising their self-hatred. If you think of a really pithy insult for people who externalise their negative feelings, please share with the rest of us, it’s badly needed.

            • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              weaponising their self-hatred

              But it’s also just regular hatred, same reason you can’t call racist people the N word.

              Even if there was a slur for hypocrites, that’s still just an ad hominem instead of attacking them for their behavior (the actual problem)

              • stray@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                But if there were a slur for hypocrites that word would by definition be attacking them for their behavior since hypocrisy is a behavioral choice and not an element of personal identity.

                I’ve actually heard “coon” from a black leftist to refer to black conservatives who try to protect themselves by being “one of the good ones” in the eyes of right-wing racists. The term isn’t something I’m comfortable using myself as a white person, but I don’t think it’s problematic or racist because it’s directed at their harmful behavior and not their skin color.