• Lussy [he/him, des/pair]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        You probably wouldn’t feel the same way if it mentioned transphobia or maybe some other form of hate speech or discrimination so please, keep your insults to yourself. Also, how do you even downvote a post?

          • Lussy [he/him, des/pair]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            What I’m saying is that this meme juxtaposes two issues that are on the same side of a coin and unnecessarily alienates people harmed by hate speech and discrimination. I get the point of the meme and I’m not attributing malice to anyone but there’s way better ways of getting the point across than this.

            • Moomoo_Milk [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              4 days ago

              Before I say anything, I am genuinely trying to understand you and not argue.

              I’m confused at how you landed at the conclusion that you did about this meme. Can you explain your thought process to how you landed at your conclusion? I’m having a hard time connecting the dots and it’s confusing me.

              • Lussy [he/him, des/pair]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Well, first of all, the meme conflates ‘rude’ with racist (which is weird) so it kind of suggests ‘rude’ is just a stand in for hate speech, so it attributes caring about hate speech and racism to liberalism.

                The point of the meme is that liberals care more about hate speech (words as it’s being implied) and racism than killing children. I mean ok, but is it really necessary? On an overwhelmingly white site? It makes me feel extremely uncomfortable, especially when reactionary rhetoric would probably fall along the same lines. And the overlap between people who care about both things is much more significant than this would suggest

                Maybe I’m just hysterical or not being charitable. I’m fine being labelled a liberal. Not sure I want to continue the conversation in this thread.

                • TommyCatkins [none/use any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  So I think I see what your interpretation is now. The meme is trying to point out that American liberals are more concerned about respectability and appearances rather than not doing racist things. The Democrats have no problems bombing foreign children. What they don’t like is openly admitting that the government is doing it for racist reasons. But the leftist perspective is that it doesn’t if the government is doing war crimes in a “tasteful” manner since the end result is the same to those being killed.

                  The point is that Trump isn’t doing anything different than Obama, Biden, or GWB did, he is just openly admitting that he is doing it for racist reasons. Liberals had no issue with bombing Yemen when Obama was doing it, or with aiding Israel do genocide on Palestine, they only took umbridge with it once the government openly stated they were doing it for racist reasons.

                • Moomoo_Milk [she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  18
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Alright, I see what you’re saying. Thank you for your explanation.

                  Your interpretation is definitely valid, but definitely not the most forward interpretation likely meant by its creator. I’m not saying you’re incorrect; It’s just the less traveled road. I think the most simple interpretation is just the difference between democrats and republicans really is just the tone of the horrors wrought upon the world. Brash vs respectful. This is probably where disconnects are being made.

                  Though you are correct. Maybe abstracting out the subject matter a little would’ve been a good idea.

  • Red_Shift [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 days ago

    The lib argument is literally that the child crushing is going to happen either way, so might as well choose the polite one. It’s a philosophy of utter defeatism for a working class person to have.

  • agentant [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    HE wants to feed foreign children AND immigrants AND queer people into the meat grinder. I want to feed foreign children and immigrants into the meat grinder and promise concessions to queer people I won’t deliver on. Do you REALLY want HIM to win? /s

  • Renin [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s no wonder many Americans assume everyone in the world is against them. By this logic Trump is the lesser evil for me, as a non-American, if a better America is impossible, okay then just make it stop quicker. Lesser evil.

      • teslekova@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Depends on if it changes the rate of killing. There’s probably a chart.

        Ironically, in Gaza, Trump actually reduced the rate of killing.

        Lebanese and Iranians probably don’t find that comforting.

          • SootySootySoot [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            It almost certainly isn’t ‘most’, at least.

            Recent estimates place roughly two million people in the Gaza strip. Gaza health ministry claim ~80,000 direct deaths - some studies suggest more like 100,000. Indirect deaths could be a few fold that. Roughly 100,000 have fled. Obviously, nobody is able to get any accurate population numbers today in there. That top end of that back-of-the-envelope guess would still estimate the death of 25% of Gazans, sickeningly.