yeah man pay this succesful director/actor/some other fucking guy a couple hundred thousand not to show up, meanwhile the vfx guys had to pawn their computers

  • Jabril [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 days ago

    Usually executive producers are funding the movie in exchange for the credit and usually a cut off the potential profits. Most of the time they are directly funding with money but sometimes they are using social capital and name recognition as their “investment.” Executive producers are not usually paid at all except in points on the back end

    Not justifying the system just explaining how it typically works

    • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      There is no justifiable system where a guy can be paid out a couple of million or hundreds of thousands or tens of thousands or even honestly a single cent for not showing up to make what is essentially an animated movie while the guys doing the animation can’t afford to eat. It doesn’t matter if the payment comes before or after. I’m sure other people get screwed too, but I just saw a thing about VFX guys so that’s where my ire is right now.

      Also every time I see a behind the scenes thing they present executive producer as essentially an Ideas Guy who knows the people with money. Which is just not a fucking job.

      • Jabril [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        9 days ago

        Right, capitalism is bad. Rich people put up their (typically inherited/unearned) capital and get to extract the profit from the workers. This is how everything works under capitalism

        • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          No other forms of art does this. Music doesn’t put the owner of the studios name in the songs! Well, not typically at least! The name on the painting isn’t an investor! We’re not pretending that poems are made by a patron.

          Yes someone getting paid for ownership is just capitalism. But separate things can be weird in different ways within capitalism

          • Krem [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            9 days ago

            another example is celebrity-owned restaurants where the celebrity name is more important than the staff. this includes restaurants where the celebrity owner is a “CHEF” but doesn’t work in the restaurant (or even create the menu probably) like the Gordon Ramsey chain

          • Jabril [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Songs have credits too, you just don’t watch them on a screen or look them up. The publishing companies, the producers. One of the most famous music producers in the world is notorious for literally doing nothing. Ceos, bosses, investors etc get the credit for shit they didn’t do always, they just shove it in your face differently