• supafuzz [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 hours ago

      In the Empire we have perfect freedom of speech as long as we only use it to say stupid shit like this. In China they would break my fingers so I could never type again. Where would you rather live

  • LaughingLion [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Huawei, CBA, and I mean take your pick of extremely attractive Chinese movie star because you can’t swing a cat in China without hitting like a dozen of them.

    For the record Syndey Sweeney’s largest grossing film was The Housemaid at $400 million global. Zhao Liying’s largest film grossed 2.45 BILLION domestically. They aren’t even playing in the same league.

    • Also if anything it’s laudable that chinese female movie stars don’t get the same name recognition and downright objectification their western counterparts get.

      Not saying that the Chinese film industry is a bastion of feminism. Far from it. But at least it is less gross than Hollywood (low fucking bar tho)

      • LaughingLion [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        I wouldn’t say that. Chinese actors and actresses absolutely get the name recognition in China. It’s just that their media doesn’t really get big outside of Asia and India.

        In other ways Chinese social media can be way more brutal towards famous people. There are definitely creeps in China in regards to famous people, 100%. It just happens differently than in the west. Different cultural, so the values flavor how it happens. Way too complicated for one reply and I’m not even Chinese so I’m not the best person to comment on it deeply anyways.

        • I’ve heard some horror stories about fame in China, that’s why I wrote the second paragraph.

          You’re right that objectification can’t take the same shape as it does in the west, even if it still happens. And what I meant is that Chinese female stars are not being sexuslized worldwide in the same way that western stars are, but that just might be a product of hegemony rather than a good thing about the Chinese film industry.

    • QuietCupcake [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah I really don’t understand the over-the-top infatuation with her in particular. She’s not that great of an actress from what I can tell. She has a very flat affect (the “dead eyes” you mention) which can be a good thing and just what certain roles call for but not great for versatility and expressivness in general. And there are countless other conventionally beautiful actresses that can check off all the same tickboxes for mass/pop-culture appeal that Sweeny can. I guess it all has to do with being in the right place at the right time and doing a bit of work in some crass and culture-war adjacent things, like that dog-whistley jeans commercial, that made the chuds latch onto her symbolically as the quintessential Murican woman.

  • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 hours ago

    okay, okay. yes there is HUAWEI, yes there is a popular China Basketball Association. but China does not have any women

    • sorter_plainview@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Seems like you are interested in the mighty American stuffs…

      Nothing important here

      Free Expression is a daily newsletter on American life, politics and culture from the Opinion pages of The Wall Street Journal. Sign up and start reading Free Expression today.

      President Trump’s visit to China has prompted Americans to reflect, as we periodically do, on the state of our superpower. Some say the future is Chinese. Don’t worry. It isn’t.

      The U.S. is rich, powerful and attractive. We are perhaps the richest, most powerful and most attractive country that’s ever been. Had we been blessed with only one of those attributes, we’d still be a formidable player on the global stage. In the event, we’re 3-for-3. We are crushing it.

      Run down the list. Almost all the world’s top companies are American. The reason is simple: Ours is an open economy governed by the rule of law. Anyone can start a company and grow it. You don’t need an uncle in the Politburo.

      The U.S. has Nvidia. We have Apple, Microsoft, Google, Meta and Tesla. We have the big, healthy and transparent financial institutions. We have Walmart. Our ability to project both hard and soft power is unrivaled. We have the NBA. We have the Northrop B-2 Spirit. We have Sydney Sweeney.

      When you look at it that way, it’s laughable to say we are in a competition for the future with China. What do they have? What have they done? TikTok. That’s pretty much it.

      Name a Chinese movie star with global box-office appeal. Name a top Chinese athlete playing in an elite sports league. Name a Chinese musician who could pack stadiums around the world like Taylor Swift or Beyoncé. Name a Chinese writer or thinker whose ideas have infiltrated the intellectual discourse. Name a clothing brand or style originating in China that has conquered the world. Name a Chinese product that you can’t live without.

      You got nothing. Be honest.

      Now name a recent military engagement that the Chinese have fought and won. Their soldiers are untested. Their pilots have no combat experience. Their navy plays sharks and minnows with Filipino fishing boats. Their supply chains run on the principles of corruption and inefficiency that are the communist hallmark.

      There is precedent for our fear of Chinese power. In the 1970s conventional wisdom held that the Soviet Union commanded a lethal modern military machine. They had the firepower and manpower to overwhelm us in a direct confrontation. Then Soviet tanks rolled into Afghanistan and the world saw how limp the threat was. The Russians hadn’t built a war machine. They’d centrally planned a paper tiger.

      No one should want war between the U.S. and China. But if it comes to that, I know which side I’d rather be on. The team that took Fallujah—twice. The team that neutralized Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. The team that snatched Maduro.

      Americans have a reputation as yokels and navel-gazers. That’s not reality. We are actually quite cosmopolitan. We can be open-minded and self-critical. We read our own reviews—even the bad ones. We know what people think of us. Most of it is motivated by envy.

      The reality is, the world is with us. If they could, they would be us. Nobody wants to be China.

      No one in Albania or Botswana dreams of living in a low-income, censorship-and-surveillance state. They want to live in a modern, prosperous society with free and fair elections. People risk everything to come here, to build new and hopeful lives in the unsexy parts of our country—midsize cities, inner-ring suburbs, rundown areas.

      Everywhere you go in the U.S. you find immigrants from around the world, raising families, building businesses, investing in their futures. That is a vote of confidence, a revealed preference. It doesn’t happen in China.

      Tune out the partisan noise and the communist propaganda. China’s per-capita GDP is in the neighborhood of Mexico’s. Its economy is dominated by state-owned enterprises—phony businesses, in other words. They don’t engage in real competition in open markets. They don’t report real numbers. Everything is a mirage intended to give the illusion of strength.

      You can’t steal your way to greatness. And you can’t bluff your way to hegemony.

      Communism is a self-defeating ideology—impoverished, weak and ugly. So don’t worry too much about the future. It’s got America written all over it.

      Mr. Hennessey is editor of Free Expression.

      • Wertheimer [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 hours ago

        There is precedent for our fear of Chinese power. In the 1970s conventional wisdom held that the Soviet Union commanded a lethal modern military machine. They had the firepower and manpower to overwhelm us in a direct confrontation. Then Soviet tanks rolled into Afghanistan and the world saw how limp the threat was. The Russians hadn’t built a war machine. They’d centrally planned a paper tiger.

        The U.S. may have failed in Afghanistan very recently and has only grown weaker and more failure-prone since then, but we’re still better than China, because more than forty years ago, another, different country that isn’t China also failed in Afghanistan.

      • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Name a Chinese movie star with global box-office appeal.

        Jackie Chan, Chow Yun Fat

        Name a top Chinese athlete playing in an elite sports league.

        Yang Hansen, Zheng Qingwen, Ma Long, Eileen Gu (retired include Yao Ming, Li Na)

        the rest of this garbage is just taking red scare bullshit as gospel. clinging to it like a soothing binkie

    • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 hours ago

      that’s all they give you for free but it would be funny if that was the whole article

      i guess for the majority of people who see it, that is the whole article.

      but if you use tor or a VPN maybe you get this instead:

      screenshot of WSJ "Access is temporarily restricted" error: "We detected unusual activity from your device or network."