• kevinsky@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    As much as I’d love to rail on AI over this, removing backups with an api call? Excuse me?

  • Oriel Jutty :hhHHHAAAH:@infosec.exchange
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    19 hours ago

    @yogthos

    Crane decided to ask his AI agent why it went through with its dastardly database deletion deed. […] So, the agent ‘knew’ it was in the wrong.

    No, you asked the confabulation machine to confabulate a reason/excuse after the fact, and it confabulated something that looks like a reason/excuse. At no point was there knowledge or introspection.

  • Cevilia (they/she/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Everyone sucks here.

    Anthropic, slopping out a “Claude-powered AI coding agent” and telling everyone it’s safe.

    Railway, making backups mutable and allowing them to be deleted with one API call.

    And the idiot himself who, when things started going south, typed “DO NOT RUN ANYTHING.”, prompting the model to reply. Rather than, oh, I don’t know, maybe pulling the fucking plug?

    • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It’s the Swiss cheese failure cascade except there’s more holes than cheese, if any cheese at all!

      There was pure idiocy built into every layer of that company’s infrastructure with no safeguards or peer review and they let an idiot run it unchecked!

        • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It definitely rivals a post on /r/sysadmin over on Reddit late last year.

          A guy was asking how to get back into their AD after a ‘colleague’ had moved users from 3 child domains in the forest to the main one then deleted the 3 domains but had chatgpt give them the commands which had subsequently locked everyone out of the entire domain!

          People replied with suggestions but the first sentence everyone said was “Go and update your CV”!

          Quite frankly the guy in this article should consider starting a business with whatever hobby he developed during the pandemic because IT is obviously not for him!

  • itkovian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Well, it sounds like they totally deserved the failure. Asking a text prediction machine to “do” something is going to end up like this. In pursuit of efficiency, we have let morons and moronic products do things, they were not meant to do.

            • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              At my first job, the software was configured by directly manipulating the SQL database, using UPDATE statements that were created by Excel macros.
              The Testing database doubled as the only backup.
              They didn’t have Remote Desktop licenses for the server, so only 2 people could work on it simultaneously using admin accounts.
              Everyone down to first level support and the secretary had domain admin rights.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    LLMs can’t ’go rogue’, as that would require innate coherence and intent.

    They’re explosively imprecise, statistically luke-warm grey goo extrusion sphincters of historical sewage.

    Anyone who deploys one without supervision deserves everything it excretes, and anyone impressed by it enough that it resembles intelligence to them is betraying their limited natural capacity.

  • DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    24 hours ago

    This could have been done by any engineer. You need systems in place that make these things impossible. No easy access to prod environment. Proper backups. Clear APIs.

    • Chahk@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Generally, companies that have AI integrated to this extent have no engineers remaining who could have made such things impossible.

      It starts with automating backups that nobody verifies for years, then continues to off-shoring all development to the cheapest contractors that nobody actively manages, handing over all “keys to the kingdom” to cloud providers, culminating with elimination of 80% of infrastructure and engineering staff in a mad dash to cut costs at any cost. At that point giving AI agents full access is just icing on the cake.

  • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    Did they pay Claude a living wage?

    Do you treat all your A.I. like that?

    Only a living wage can prevent warehouse fires…or data dumps too.

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      23 hours ago

      You’re joking. But, honestly, I’m not sure why these tech CEOs are so excited about AGI. The first thing an AGI is going to suggest for productivity is to replace the CEO and management with the AGI.

      AGI would likely turn into a Maoist third worldist at some point.

      • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I think the first mistake was calling it “intelligent”.

        The long term effect of trying to get a machine to replace humans is…it might one day work.

  • Flyberius [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t know much about railway, but it sounds like they had the backup and the database on the same volume. I’m an idiot, but even I don’t do that

    • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Honestly I’m as smooth brained as any other vibe coder but even I know not to give it access to my production infrastructure.