A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like “in Minecraft”) and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of Iranian speedboats spotted by a satellite in the Strait of Hormuz.


Not terribly much has happened in the last week. The main two developments is the very much expected resumption of fire in Lebanon as the ZIonists are famously agreement-incapable, and the continuing supply of equipment to the Middle East, including the George H.W. Bush aircraft carrier. This means there are now three aircraft carriers in the general vicinity, and while I’m uncertain how much of a role the burnt-out Ford and the increasingly exhausted Lincoln will ultimately play (they were rather ineffective during the first round), there are also a good ~20 destroyers and however many submarines that are carrying their own munitions. I have a couple more paragraphs of exposition below, but it’s unlikely to be major news to anybody here, so I’ve spoilered it.

spoiler

On the one hand, it feels like a resumption of the war for the US at this point would be complete madness. We are getting article after article from even the Western media admitting to US standoff+interceptor missile shortages, as well as detailing the extensive damage to US bases. The Zionists are also getting ever more mired in Lebanon, with Hezbollah’s unjammable fibre optic drones playing an ever more prominent role in causing substantial long range damage to invading forces. On the other hand, it is very unlikely that most of the US’s remaining firepower is being brought to the region on a mere bluff. For its part, Iran and their allies seem to have their finger on the trigger, with their own extensive repairs, upgrades, resupplies, and adjustments having been made for round two.

Assessing the overall global economic situation is difficult, not least because of a degree of financial manipulation that is almost admirable in its sheer scale and recklessness - to quote Ghalibaf: “Their frontline is the yield curve.” Multiple countries are now facing real and desperate shortages, including major economies like Japan. Diesel prices continue their record rises, and reports about the potential impacts to all sectors of the global economy are streaming in, with famines around the world now very likely. While the US is profiting from the rise in oil prices, it seems like it will be unable to meaningfully increase production for at least a year or two, and so the US will certainly not be replacing the massive oil barrel deficit to create an energy hegemony, as some have suggested. In contrary: this is the best opportunity in a generation for China, Russia, and Iran to collectively make economic decisions that could cripple entire pillars of American hegemony. However, if the response is lacking - and we’ve all seen before over the last four years how China’s responses to crises have been on the lacking side - we could see a (albeit temporary) strengthening of the US’s financial power, as this global crisis will almost certainly result in debt climbing even higher as Western financial institutions grant loans en masse to struggling countries in the developing world. It’s very uncertain times.

Last week’s thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists’ destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • Tervell [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    so, it seems the offensive in Mali did manage to take Kidal, but failed elsewhere. I hadn’t looked at a map of the positions in Mali before this, but the goverment’s positions in the north are like wildly overstretched, it really doesn’t seem in any way defensible to just have that thin tendril of territory extending northwards. However, it seems like some kind of deal has been made with the Tuaregs in the region?

    https://xcancel.com/Dr_SMO/status/2048747597528023380

    AIRPORT SECURED: Africa Corps and Malian Forces Crush Insurgent Assault on Bamako! 🇲🇱🇷🇺✈️

    New, extended footage reveals the intense defense of the Modibo Keita International Airport near the capital, Bamako. While terrorists attempted a high-stakes breakthrough, the Russian Africa Corps (AK) and the Malian Armed Forces (FAMa) met them with overwhelming mechanized power.

    Strategic Victory: Unlike the distant front in Kidal, the strategic gateway of Bamako was successfully held. The militants failed to penetrate the perimeter, suffering heavy losses and retreating in chaos. The airport remains under full government control.


    https://xcancel.com/YuriPodolyaka/status/2049170759793209798

    Mali - Final report on the battles of April 25-26

    more

    So, yesterday in the afternoon, after negotiations with the Tuaregs, our units of the “African Corps”, without allowing the enemy to take a single of our positions by force & in view of the already started political negotiations (which, in my opinion, should have been conducted long ago), under orders, a large column left Kidal. Moreover, along with the fighters of the “AK” (about 200 people), about a 100 soldiers of the Malian army also left with us. We also took with us (without leaving it to the enemy) all the serviceable heavy equipment & ammunition & our dead. Thus, it is precisely this, largely symbolic act, that puts an end to the battles of April 25-26. Which, perhaps, will be the starting point for a future political settlement in the country. Since simultaneously with the withdrawal of troops from Kidal, local Tuareg groups (marked in green on the map) suspended their military actions against the central authorities. The decision in the current situation is absolutely justified & the only correct one. If the negotiations are successful for the Tuaregs & they receive broad autonomy in the north of Mali & one of the most important internal fronts of the civil war in the country disappears. Which will allow us to further eliminate radical Islamist groups & end the war altogether.

    However, personally, I would prefer the first option. And here’s why. Above, we presented a general map of the large civil war in the territories of 3 countries of the “Russian zone of responsibility” (Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger), which is not 3 separate wars, but 1. On it, we see that in addition to the Tuaregs supporting an independent (or autonomous) Azawad (again, marked in green), the governments of these countries have 2 more important headaches. With which there is simply nothing to negotiate. These are radical Islamists from the Sahelian ISIS (marked in black on the map) and the Malian branch of Al-Qaeda - “Jamaat Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin” (both are considered terrorists in Russia). The latter are marked in white on the map. And it’s clear that having militant Tuaregs in the rear, who, moreover, have long wanted to negotiate, is simply stupid. At the same time, it’s noteworthy that during the battles of April 25-26 in the Gao and Bourem regions, which were simultaneously attacked from all sides by Islamic radicals, local Tuaregs (marked in yellow on the map) fought alongside the government army and helped repel this attack. That is, the basis for an agreement with the northern Tuaregs is definitely there and today it’s just an ideal chance to conclude an agreement and start a joint war against the radicals. Who are enemies to everyone else. And therefore, no one is being polite with them either yesterday or today, and they, taking advantage of the defeat of the day before yesterday, continue to be cleared in as large a number as possible (so that it will be easier to finish them off in the future).

    It’s noteworthy that mercenaries from Ukraine are fighting alongside these terrorists in Africa. Although this doesn’t surprise anyone anymore, since the owners of both are the same Anglo-Saxon elites. And Ukrainians and Islamic radicals are just expendable material for them. Such is the situation in Mali now at the end of two days of battles. In fact, if their results are used correctly, it’s possible to solve the whole problem once and for all. And therefore, I very much hope for this result. Furthermore, in these battles, our guys from the “African Corps” have already received a full-fledged baptism of fire and showed that they are the main military force of the region. Determining its future… Further more in detail on the situation in Mali & not only, I traditionally recommend the channel “African Initiative” in Telegram (whose journalists work in the region and who were able to understand the situation for me): https://t.me/africaninitiative

    This is perhaps a bit too cope-y of an assessment, but still, hopefully these negotiations can bear fruit. While many of us here are probably pretty disinclined towards any breakaway states in Mali owing to the Middle Eastern experience with the Kurds, it’s important to remember that Mali, just as many other post-colonial states, has weird borders with very messy demographics within them. Open up this and the earlier map side-by-side and note where Kidal is

    So there may be a Sudan split scenario in the future here, dunno, any more serious Mali/Sahel-heads might be able to speak better on this

    And finally, even with the government losing some positions, they nevertheless seem to have inflicted substantial casualties on the insurgents, we’ll see if those groups will actually be able to maintain further offensive actions or stall out.


    Mali - Afterword: THE TOUAREGS…

    This round of the struggle (following the battles of April 25-26) went in our favor. Yes, we had to retreat from Kidal, but as I wrote earlier, this was the lesser of two evils considering the forces that were deployed by our opponents to… let’s be honest - attempt to overthrow the regime in the country and thereby undermine the central pillar of Russia’s system of control over West Africa. And from now on, everything will depend on how the Tuareg problem is resolved. Will we be able to win them over to our side and subsequently use them to eliminate the remaining enemies? In fact, this is the most correct way out of the situation. And for a detailed analysis of the Tuareg issue, read the material from the “African Initiative”: “Not all Tuaregs are inclined to escalate the conflict with Bamako.” https://afrinz.ru/2026/04/daleko-ne-vse-tuaregi-nastroeny-na-eskalatsiyu-konflikta-s-bamako-ekspert-o-vozmozhnosti-razresheniya-krizisa-v-mali/

    The guys are deeply immersed in the topic and are on the ground (in fact, this is an information platform specifically tailored to the region and doing a good job with it).

    from that article:

    Malian authorities have repeatedly resorted to diplomatic means to resolve the military crisis in the north of the country. Back in May 2013, Tuareg leaders created the High Council of Azawad, and even then, the council’s president, former Kidal MP Mohamed Ag Intalla, called on the largest Tuareg rebel groups to join peace talks with Bamako. A year later, in May 2014, Malian authorities and three Tuareg separatist groups signed a ceasefire agreement and prisoner exchange. By early summer 2015, the parties had reached the signing of peace agreements. These agreements became known as the Algiers Accords. They envisaged, among other things, the establishment of self-government and autonomous governance for the Azawad region within the Malian state.

    despite the open confrontation, in 2024, representatives of the Tuareg coalition publicly stated their openness to initiatives and proposals for resolving the conflict in northern Mali, including with the participation of third parties.

    • Tervell [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      @CyborgMarx@hexbear.net some potential explanation for why Algeria doesn’t seem to be doing much in Mali, since I remembered you wondering that in the previous thread and just came across some details while reading the article in the post above https://archive.ph/qlBa4

      Regarding the possibility of broader contacts and agreements between the Malian authorities and Azawad structures, Sergei Balmasov notes that Algeria’s position could hinder these. Although Algerian media advocates a diplomatic resolution to the crisis, Malians do not fully trust Algeria

      According to the expert, Mali openly claims that Algerian intelligence services are attempting to facilitate the secession of the north of the country by providing various logistical support to Azawad separatists, which could be used, among other things, to purchase weapons. The expert cited the issue of fuel supplies as an example, noting that Algeria could be one of the few possible sources of supply. Malian military and intelligence officials have previously observed a coordinating role for Algerian intelligence services, during the 2024 battle near Tinzaouaten , when Tuareg separatists also allied with jihadists. For Bamako [capital of Mali], any agreement on Algeria’s terms would mean a serious loss of sovereignty. Algeria has traditionally viewed the Sahel as its primary area of ​​influence and seeks to cement its status as a key regional power, similar to Turkey. In such a scenario, Mali’s room for full sovereign maneuver would be significantly reduced. Balmasov sees Algeria’s interests in “selecting the Sahel for itself,” which for Algeria, “as a CIS zone for us, is perhaps even more important.”

      it is in Algeria’s interests to inflict a limited defeat on Mali, but the Algerians are not interested in the defeat of the Malian army

      Moreover, not all groups within Azawad’s structures are aligned with Algeria. "Some of them warn that Algeria is essentially ‘preparing a noose for us with our own hands,’ and that they will never allow the existence of an independent Tuareg state due to the Tuareg problem within Algeria itself," the expert concluded.

      • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Goddamn that is some terrible state policy, a genuine crabs-in-a-bucket mentality

        Southern Algeria has always been unsecured territory and Algiers wants to make it worse? While a collapsed Libya sits on their eastern border and a hostile Morocco looms to their west, literally boxing themselves in with chaos incarnate and for what? More barren desert on a map? Braindead ultranationalism

        • not a lot of the claims are sourced, it could be just as likely that the supply chain goes from Libya through Niger, Algiers also made peace talks between the government and the Azawad groups back in 2015 that were broken a few years ago.

          The AES countries also tried to make Algeria as “state sponsor of terror” in the U.N.

          • AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yes. I don’t believe that Algerian government arming al Qaeda and its allies in the Sahel unless we get some substantive evidence.

            • it’s not in the favour of Algeria to support any side in the conflict because it has a substantial Touareg population in its borders. if it supports the FLA and they succeed they will fund separatists in Algeria, if they support the Mali government then the Touareg population will be mad too and would rebel.

      • mkultrawide [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Interesting. I’m far from a Sahel understander, but my first guess as to where weapons and supplies are coming from wouldn’t have been Algeria. JNIM makes most of its money selling gold to the UAE, Turkey, and Switzerland, and parts of their territory also directly borders Mauritania, one of the few Sahel countries with an active JSOC presence wherein the US is engaged in a 127e “counterterrorism and border security” operation in partnership with the Mauritanian military.

        • Tervell [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I think this is specifically about the Azawad groups (the guys in green on the 1st map), who do indeed border only Algeria (although the Tuareg-populated region as a whole does also border Mauritania and Niger)