stenAanden@feddit.dk to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 28 days agoPeanut butterfeddit.dkimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1112cross-posted to: politicalmemes@lemmy.world
arrow-up1112imagePeanut butterfeddit.dkstenAanden@feddit.dk to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 28 days agomessage-square67fedilinkcross-posted to: politicalmemes@lemmy.world
minus-squarebizarroland@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-228 days agoI meant it in the secondary definition of the term, which is “establishing a probability”. Plausible is also a good word for it, but probable is still apt
minus-squareotp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·28 days agoThis is the first time I’ve heard that definition. It seems like a niche definition that can easily result in misunderstandings
minus-squareblarghly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·28 days agoYou aren’t establishing a probability. Or, by saying “probably” you are establishing a probability of > 0.5… with absolutely no proof.
I meant it in the secondary definition of the term, which is “establishing a probability”.
Plausible is also a good word for it, but probable is still apt
This is the first time I’ve heard that definition. It seems like a niche definition that can easily result in misunderstandings
You aren’t establishing a probability.
Or, by saying “probably” you are establishing a probability of > 0.5… with absolutely no proof.