QatarEnergy, the world’s largest producer of natural gas, just got bombed.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 minutes ago

    Y’know, usually the markets price things in well before they happened, but there was a whole lot of hopium this time that somehow a large-scale Middle Eastern war would not effect fossil fuel production and shipping.

  • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Good. Fuck being dependent on dictators for our energy. Renewables is the only way forward. Eurpean energy for Europeans.

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Economy is imploding because people don’t want to pick between switching to green energy and not murdering brown people.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not really the issue at hand, but sure. This is less about getting to kill brown people than about Iranians. And their government lacks public support and is not just willing to do mass killings in the streets and executions to maintain their grip on power but is actually doing that too.

      The civilian death toll is probably going to be much lower than in the January protests. But that does not mean that a military intervention is right or resolves the participants from doing nation building afterward.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Unfortunately, we don’t, because those take a long time to build and we keep putting it off.

      And the other option requires batteries that take a long time to make, and we only just started on that.

      Edit: why am I getting downvoted for complaining about how pretty much every western government isnt doing enough to transition to other power sources?

      • chux@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 minutes ago

        A more modern and interconnected grid would do a lot already and greatly reduce the demand for batteries. There are many things one can do. But you are right in the sense that they are largely not done. That doesnt mean there exists no way though. We know how to do it but we dont.

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Nah. All it takes is investment and commitment to treating electricity like a utility beyond the profit imperative. Look at what China is doing with sodium-ion batteries.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        5 hours ago

        ‘Nuclear takes too long to build’ has been an argument against nuclear for several times longer than it takes to build even the most stringently safe nuclear power plant… its depressing.

      • kaprap@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What do you mean you don’t? Has everything I heard in Cuba, China and Africa been a lie?

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          China is building a load of nuclear plants, it’s working very well for them and moving very quickly. They’re also building numerous solar farms and coal plants because they need whatever they can get.

          Many places in Africa are doing great on Solar power, but they have requirements orders of magnitude lower than most western countries.

          I don’t know much about Cuba.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    It seems to me that every major conflict (Russia, Middle East) spikes oil prices, relatively unpredictably (if you can call this unpredictable).

    Maybe the world should look for alternative sources of energy, which are abundant, cheap, and can be deployed non centrally?

    No. No that’s insane.

  • Melchior@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 hours ago

    And the German government wants to end the sales ban for gas boilers. 55% of German gas consumption is used to heat buildings. So this is a key part of reducing consumption. Another case of a conservative government hurting Germany badly.

    • Ibuthyr@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m laughing because I went with Habeck’s advice and installed a simple heat exchanger in my house that is hooked up to a centralized community heating system that runs on sustainable heat sources. Because Habeck, imperfect as he may have been, had a realistic view on things that was rooted in scientific data.

      Fuck the CDU and fuck the SPD, fucking class-traitor scumbags.

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    We buy the much more expensive US fracking gas. That spike is a minor blip to Europe.

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      The European Commission has a website listing the top gas suppliers to Europe
      https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/infographics/where-does-the-eu-s-gas-come-from/

      Our main suppliers are, as of 2025:

      • Norway - 31.1%
      • United States - 25.4%
      • Russia - 13.1%
      • North Africa - 12.8%
      • United Kingdom - 4.3%
      • Qatar - 3.8%

      While Qatar doesn’t provide a huge proportion of European gas, it’s not insignificant either. A disruption in the supply of Qatari gas could very easily cause prices to go up by a lot.

      Edit: It’s almost as if we should do everything in our power to rid ourselves of the dependency on fossil fuels.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s not just about where european countries buy, there’s a global market, it’s about who bought gas from Qatar and where they will buy their gas now. AFAIK Qatar exports a lot to asian countries, if they can’t get gas from Qatar anymore they’re going to buy from other countries, for example from the USA. That’s going to raise the price for US fracking gas and will affect Europe.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Too many innocent people will be affected by this so I can’t say “leopards eating face” without reservations, but still, those leopards will be eating good tonight.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      In democracies there are no innocent people. Everybody is complicit in not shifting energy sources since the 1970ies.

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Including them. They can feel less guilty, but democracy means that the people decide and they are part of the people.

          If they don’t agree with the vote they have to look for means to convince the rest and change the vote.

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Then it’s a dumb take that you are responsible since 1970.

          But since you have been an adult, as a member of a democracy, you are responsible for what the democracy does. That’s the deal. The election decides. If the majority decides something bad, bad luck, that’s still shared among everybody.