• 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Hobbit rockets never leave the ground. They use pipe-weed as fuel and, by T plus 60 of any launch, the engineers are all giggling on the launch pad eating funions as a quick post-elevenses snack.

    • Rooster326@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      No but I’m sure it lt would literally (read: narratively) affect any mortal programming the computer, or setting the LLM out with such a purpose.

  • saltnotsugar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This is more of an orbital nuclear defense question since Mordor has a pretty in depth strategy against this sort of threat. Frodo probably didn’t consider this option because of the Pan-Middle Earth nuclear deescalation agreement of the second age, sub section 2, page five, which if violated could have big international downstream effects.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Well it’s interesting that it makes regular ringing/metallic sounds when it’s dropped(at least in the movies), so it is not inelastic. Which means it could be deformed if placed under extreme force but it would always spring back into shape. So I think it might be the world’s most powerful spring.

    • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It really depends on the other material properties. Like if it’s as slippery as nylon vs as slippery as rubber is really gonna change things. Plus how does it react to outside forces trying to destroy it? Absorption? Diffusion? Conversion (like heat into sound or something).

      All that would drastically change what you could do with it

        • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Sure. For me (computer scientist but went to engineering based school) I’d be most excited about the experimental possibilities.

          I mean if nothing else the potential to have the world’s most stable mass and dimensional object could revolutionize measurements, which might not sound the most practical until you realize just how much we rely on dimensional accuracy for so many things.

          There’s some experiments where we fire a laser at things, and we’re approaching powers (zetawatts) where things basically instantly melt. Having a material that can withstand that could allow experiments that could push our understanding of light, nuclear reactions, quantum mechanics, and more.

          From a practical aspect. If it, say, absorbs heat. Having a limitless heat sink could potentially let us explore deeper into the Earth’s core than ever before (where the heat and pressure really caused issues for the drills).

          And all that is just off a few seconds thought from a non engineer.

          • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            If it absorbs infinite heat, it would be great as a you heatsink - think of the possibilities? Or maybe it just has zero heat capacity.

          • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Not sure if it is useful for measurement standards, as it is seen changing size based on the wielder.

            which could be use for stuff. big finger person puts something inside, hand it to someone with smaller fingers, and it has unlimited crushing force.

            • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Well, it doesn’t change size based on the wielder. It changes size based on its will and what it percieves will bring it the result it desires. Which is admittedly way more complex and abstract. This is why I said knowing more about it’s properties would be extremely important to figuring out how to use it.

              If it only changes size in one direction, like growing bigger to slip off a finger, but the band width never changes, then it would still be extremely useful for some measurements. We also don’t know if there’s a maximum or minimum to it’s size changes which would greatly matter.