- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmit.online
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmit.online
You must log in or # to comment.
arnt some men peferentially choosing female passengers, because they are kinda pervy. it make sense woman wants to feel safe instead of having a potential creep of a male driver.
This is a complex situation, but I enjoy seeing Uber get sued regardless
Same. Lyft stole my time and gas money refusing to pay me for a ride I gave someone when I was driving for them
Heh. You think your time & money is your own. How’s that working out, citizen?
I think you meant serf.
Serfs had it better, NGL.
Just add a men-only option. Problem solved.
That only solves the problem if there is an equal demand for both. Assuming there isn’t, the male drivers still have a claim for lost income as a result of their gender.
Nope, because it’s the male drivers fault the demand is different.
It solves Uber’s problem, in that Uber set up a feature to favor one sex.
Men drivers can’t blame the public if theirs isn’t as much demand for their services.
And who would use it?
Like 1/100th of the number who use the women-only option?
But that would make sense, and that is not what virtue signalling is about.
Fuck it, just add a character creator to the Uber app, and it’ll only match you with drivers that look like your custom character.
Me, a person of culture who loves to create beautiful and T H I C C women when a game allows to: I mean… Yes, but…
butt*
YES!
Heritage Foundation: We much create safe zones to protect women.
Also Heritage Foundation: Not like that!
Wait, so like hijabs?
It makes perfect sense if you replace “safe zones” with “cooking, cleaning, child rearing”…
deleted by creator
Lol, this post was directly below on my feed.
I’d hire him.
