Expected by who? Not everyone pretended this would happen more slowly

I would have donated but I can’t find a publicly listed wallet address for them

Not seeing a link here. Again, this platform has bans, making it an inappropriate place for you to rage bait me, and not a great place for me to read your replies after you’ve demonstrated your penchant for rage baiting.

Why?

Same. Lyft stole my time and gas money refusing to pay me for a ride I gave someone when I was driving for them

And didn’t “OpenAI” try to justify this horseshit by complaining about Chinese open source models somehow stealing the tech of their closed source models?

So this link shows a comment for you, not just a blank space? https://piefed.social/post/1458050/comment/8784509#replies

Here’s a screenshot of what I’m seeing

Nope, not seeing it there

Weak gaslighting attempt but if you could show me where to find it documented I would appreciate that.

If anyone is confused, feel free to ask me for proof I’m telling the truth. If I posted it here, I’m pretty sure I’d be at risk of getting banned for evading the post removal (because the proof would also lead you back to the reply chain that was removed)

Edit - maybe this counts as proof without showing any removed content:

https://piefed.social/post/1458050/comment/8784509#replies

If you click the link, it’s blank, yet it has a “parent comment” link that leads to where I was replying

Edit 2 - tried to post an archive link but archive.org didn’t seem to work the way I thought?

Is the link I posted above showing what I described for other users?

Nah. Maybe dumb spending on fake AI. Or more accurately nothing, the jobs are just not really being replaced.

Strange how your bad faith reply is still here, and with many upvotes, while my reply calling you out appears to be gone.

This is an example of how discussions like this are more appropriate for nostr, where there are no bans / post removals.

I already called you out for rage baiting me on a platform with bans.

Do you have a link to the nostr copy of this reply, or did you expect me to read all that here?

Seems best to just not give them any attention in general

No. I’ll need engines because I have too many enemies, and not enough supporters.

Rowing (or even getting out to swim and pull) is safer if you have enough people, because we can’t safely make and power engines.

I want a boat bigger than I can row on my own, so I want a motor. But I wouldn’t want much if I wasn’t up against people that seem to use motorized stuff to derive an advantage while starting gunfights over food that isn’t rightly theirs.

Essentially, yeah.

Noticed an overall “vibe” where Rust critics repeatedly have points that sound like they make sense, and I can’t really think of examples of them saying confusing nonsense, or refusing to elaborate on a point when challenged to. Whereas, other way around for Rust defenders.

Best way I know to determine what’s “sus” is to look at what’s defended by people who are willing to elaborate on the points you ask them to elaborate on. It’s almost a perfect gauge. But maybe not quite perfect, and you could totally call it “vibes.” I remain not totally certain about Rust.

I think youre reading way too much into having sails or not lol

I’m not. My point is you don’t realize how many areas you should be applying this kind of thinking in.

I would not want to go back to that era of illiteracy, poverty and disease.

But you’d want to stay in this one? Or what’s your point supposed to be?

Adapting old ideas into the modern world where it makes sense is good though

I’m saying, when you think about how fucked up it is that we went so far with removing sails from cargo ships, you can see more of how deep we are in misuse of technology. It’s a microcosm of a big picture.

What do you mean?

Not exactly.

You self admittidly don’t know code, so like, why are you trying to argue about code?

Because the level of knowledge that would stop you from rephrasing my words into “don’t know code” is much higher than the level of knowledge I’m using in the argument.

That’s like a DJ and a Barber arguing over which carbueretor jet is correct in a classic Mercedes. The answer is muddier and than either of them know enough to understand, because they’re not mechanics or engineers.

How is that like an unpaid cybersecurity expert arguing about cybersecurity then?

Are you a programmer?

Already answered this and you acknowledged that in the beginning. It’s becoming clearer and clearer you’re replying in purely bad faith.

Cybersecurity researcher?

Kinda, but not really.

Bot designed to sow discontent with pretty arguement?

Obviously not, and now it seems like you’re trying to bait me into the kind of response that could get me banned here. This discussion would be more appropriate for nostr, where no one can be banned.

Like, what’s the point of all this?

The main point of your gish gallop is to waste my time and energy and confuse other people.

The main point on my side of the discussion has been to raise awareness of how concerned the general public should be (and sadly isn’t) about the general state of cybersecurity right now, especially in vital areas like how the Linux ecosystem and coding languages themselves are developing.

Neither of you know what you’re talking about

Incorrect. I have talked about, for example, a user’s statements in a discussion I linked to. I know this. You can’t really provide an example of anything I’ve mentioned here that I don’t know about.

You could use “don’t know what you’re talking about” as a euphemism for how the person I was replying to was spewing bullshit, but I’d just call them a liar. Seems more straightforward. Either way, that’s not me.

don’t even know what you’re talking about but I can clearly read the vibes based technobabble between you

I think in this context, you should be trying to ignore the vibes and understand what’s being said.

so like, why?

Awareness should be raised for this stuff, because people are sadly not as concerned as they should be about the state of cybersecurity right now. It’s particularly an issue in Linux / FOSS circles where there seems to be more of a false sense of security these days.

Your reply is evidence of that, especially considering before your reply, there was evidence in the form of vote scores and culture, and especially damning evidence in the sidebar’s “rules” section.