• ragica@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      And how can that be lighter than a bicycle, since it is a bicycle with extra stuff?

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 days ago

        Not lighter, it has much less air resistance because of aerodynamic design.

        The human torso on a regular bicycle is basically a wall. If you’ve ever ridden a bicycle on a windy day, you should know the agony. It’s like continuously riding up a slope.

          • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yeah, I didn’t think of the graph when responding.

            Though I believe it’s wrong.

            How is a bicycle supposed to weigh 100 kg with a rider? The average bike is certainly less than 20 kg so the rider would have to weigh 80 kg or more - which seems like a lot for the average human. I mean, it’s overweight even for the average man.

            According to the German Wikipedia page, velomobiles weigh between 20 to 40 kg. And the former seems to be only achievable with a full carbon fiber build. That’s definitely more than your average bicycle.

        • falseWhite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          You’re talking about efficiency, but in the chart the velomobile is marked as lighter than a bicycle. Why?

          • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 days ago

            It’s denoted as being only slightly lighter, which I guess might be doable if you’re optimal about the construction. It is indeed a bit weird though, on average a bicycle should be possible to build lighter than a velomobile