• ragica@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    And how can that be lighter than a bicycle, since it is a bicycle with extra stuff?

    • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      Not lighter, it has much less air resistance because of aerodynamic design.

      The human torso on a regular bicycle is basically a wall. If you’ve ever ridden a bicycle on a windy day, you should know the agony. It’s like continuously riding up a slope.

        • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah, I didn’t think of the graph when responding.

          Though I believe it’s wrong.

          How is a bicycle supposed to weigh 100 kg with a rider? The average bike is certainly less than 20 kg so the rider would have to weigh 80 kg or more - which seems like a lot for the average human. I mean, it’s overweight even for the average man.

          According to the German Wikipedia page, velomobiles weigh between 20 to 40 kg. And the former seems to be only achievable with a full carbon fiber build. That’s definitely more than your average bicycle.

      • falseWhite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        You’re talking about efficiency, but in the chart the velomobile is marked as lighter than a bicycle. Why?

        • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 days ago

          It’s denoted as being only slightly lighter, which I guess might be doable if you’re optimal about the construction. It is indeed a bit weird though, on average a bicycle should be possible to build lighter than a velomobile