Lemmy.one
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
electronVolt@sh.itjust.works to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 1 day ago

Most technologies continue to improve with innovation, like WiFi. What is a technology that was nearly perfect upon conception?

message-square
message-square
69
fedilink
97
message-square

Most technologies continue to improve with innovation, like WiFi. What is a technology that was nearly perfect upon conception?

electronVolt@sh.itjust.works to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 1 day ago
message-square
69
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • lemming741@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Solid body electric guitars- the first models have been in continuous production and are still available.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fender_Telecaster

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibson_Les_Paul

    There were earlier “electric guitars” but I’m thinking all inventions build on previous creations. I don’t think you’ll find many pure answers to OPs question. I think the closest you’ll find is going to be an advancement that produced a single step change in design that flattened the innovation curve forever after. I think the microwave oven was a great example.

    Electric fuses also come to mind. Little has changed since 1890.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Velcro? Inspired by nature’s invention

    https://www.microphotonics.com/biomimicry-burr-invention-velcro/

    Also outdoor grills don’t seem to have changed much other than the material used to keep the fire going.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The 707.

  • SpikedPunchVictim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    RSS Feeds

    • notarobot@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Really? I tried a bunch of time and don’t see the appeal. I haven found any like category filtering so I can’t subscible to like just tech or whatever. I think I’m doing it wrong

    • lemming741@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      So good, that Google abandoned their reader

  • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Dildos

    • AnotherUsername@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Silicone might be better than wood

  • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The bowl.

    • AnotherUsername@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Ceramic might be better than wood

      • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I appreciate the operation you’re running here

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I think sewing machines would count? They certainly got a hell lot more “portable”, but the basic design hasn’t changed much since the 1880s. Those things are little mechanical marvels

  • Owl@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    17 hours ago

    nearly

    • Anna@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If you think C is perfect then I think your mother dropped you one too many.

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        “nearly” is, by definition, not.

  • Bobo The Great@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Maybe not perfect upon conception, but after a couple of decades from common adoption, the bycicle really didn’t change much. Sure, you can use lighter and more advanced materials, you can add an electric motor to it (though I wouldn’t classify it as a bycicle) but you can probably take a 100 years old bike and it would work just as good as a modern one.

    • newaccountwhodis@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Who needs gears when you can build the mechanical reduction into the wheel size.

    • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Have you seen belt drive bikes? Not the electric ones. Pretty cool stuff, much lower maintenance. Also internal gear hubs. There’s still innovation happening in bicycles to make them stronger against abuse

    • Infrapink@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It also too about 100 years to reach the modern design of rubber tyres and a drive train, with the rider sitting slightly forward of the rear axle and well behind the front wheel.

  • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The pointed stick.

    • AnotherUsername@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Steel capped ends

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      No, it was later improved by using different materials, better tools to make it and hardening it with fire.

  • HighlandCow@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Maybe FM synthesis, it revolutionised the sound of the 1980s and music production as a whole

  • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The 3.5mm audio jack. It’s so fundamentally simplistic from a manufacturing standpoint and circuitry standpoint that any headset you throw at it will work identically without fail (the key innovation being the speakers or headphones where the analog signal is sent to).

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Technically 1/4” jacks were first. 1/8” only to make 1/4” smaller.

  • loweffortname@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    Potato peelers. The ergonomic handle was a big step forward, yes. But the basic design hasn’t (and likely won’t) change.

    • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Wasn’t expecting this answer. Can you elaborate?

      • runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        potato peeler

        Show this to a person from 1900 and other than the plastic, nothing has changed.

        • AnotherUsername@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I would happily argue that the plastic is a step down; metal potato peelers last a lot longer.

          • loweffortname@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The metal ones last longer, but the Oxo ones (like above) don’t hurt as much.

  • Greddan@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 day ago

    Saw a post just today with a 1000 year old folding chair. Looked pretty much identical to the ones used today. Lost the post but kept the picture.

  • NorthWestWind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    Microwave oven. It sort of just…appeared, and the design didn’t change much.

    • ambitious_bones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      23 hours ago

      In my Flat we still have a microwave that does not have a rotating plate. Insteadt it has a spinning rotor in the roof that deflects the waves in order to cook food evenly. It works well but it is needlessly complicated compared to modern microwaves.

      • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Most microwaves have a spinning wave stirrer in addition to the rotating plate. From the description here, it just sounds like either your plate rotation motor is broken or you’ve got a weirdly simple microwave.

        • Melonpoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          This is the first time I’ve heard that they have a wave stirrer. I’ve never seen one in person.

          • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Usually it’s not inside the same chamber as the food as then it would be a nuisance to clean. You need to take a microwave apart to see the wave stirrer.

        • ambitious_bones@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Weirdly simple. It does not have a rotation motor. It is quite old.

Asklemmy@lemmy.ml

asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !asklemmy@lemmy.ml

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

  • !lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
  • !fediverse@lemmy.ml
  • !selfhosted@lemmy.world

Looking for a community?

  • Lemmyverse: community search
  • sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
  • !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 802 users / day
  • 2.6K users / week
  • 5.44K users / month
  • 14.5K users / 6 months
  • 748 local subscribers
  • 50.8K subscribers
  • 7.82K Posts
  • 385K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Evan@lemmy.ml
  • mekhos@lemmy.ml
  • tmpod@lemmy.pt
  • OrangeSlice@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org