• penitentkulak [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    There’s a particularly horrifying story from a local dairy farm where a worker

    spoiler

    climbed into some kind of mixer to unclog it, didn’t lock it out, and for some reason it was controllable via WiFi and the boss decided the mixer should be running.

    Guy was like 30 with a small kids and his own farm, but had to work at this shitty dairy to supplement his income. Big farm in the area bought out his whole place within a few months of him passing.

      • octobob@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        It’s incredibly common in industrial automation to control things over networking. Usually it’s an Ethernet connection to a computer or laptop interfacing with a PLC that’s running code, but same idea. I’ve built and installed control rooms in steel mills, they’re mostly computers running Siemens or Allen Bradley (Rockwell) software, monitors hooked up to cameras around the mill, and operator stations with push buttons, joysticks, lights, e-stops, etc. And plenty of HMI’s (big touch screens). Think Homer Simpson’s job

        • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Networking is different than wireless.

          Are least a cable connection means something is nearby. A wireless connection that can be accessed over WAN is what I was freaking out about.

          • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            You’re not wrong, in mfg and similar I’ve personally only ever seen wireless anything used for measurement instrumentation, explicitly not control, and that was even using a more proprietary wireless than 802.11 / typical WLAN.

            I’ve been out of those industries for a while and to be fair the ones I serviced were on the more expensive process side (which does translate to better equipment but even just better safety expectations), so idk how accurate my experiences are. But yeah wireless control was def considered unacceptably risky, your instincts are correct.

          • krolden@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            You’re thinking cellular wireless. It was likely just wifi or some other RF protocol