radical for-profit “investment” in healthcare research, production, and administration makes outcomes worse, not better

not to be a raging commie but this upsets me

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 天前

    twice as much money to live several years shorter and work that much closer to retirement, most likely

    are you winning, america?

  • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 天前

    I wonder if the life expectancy is calculated as a birth-to-death or weighted to reduce the effect of infant mortality, which I imagine is also worse in the US.

    If not, I wonder how our anti-abortion and anti-women legislation contributes to that life expectancy reduction in addition to the lack of access to healthcare.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 天前

      High healthcare costs also add to childhood mortality as parents are less likely to bring their kids in for preventative care

    • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 天前

      You mean the ~$200/hr contract cleaners at the nonprofit “rehab center” our 80something year old parents go to is going to profit? no way!

      Now multiply that single contract worker doing cleaning to all aspects of building maintenance, medical devices… and unbelievably these are all for-profit entities acting as vendors are owned by the same entity that owns the nonprofit healthcare facility.

      I’m not making this up, sadly.

  • zeca@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 天前

    A public health system can focus on the prevention of health problems, which saves a lot of money… and lives. The private sector has no interest in that.

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    3 天前

    Life in the US may be intolerably expensive and exploitative, but look on the bright side - at least it’s short.

  • Metype @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 天前

    In my defense I’m a little stoned, but I couldn’t find the US flag for a moment it’s such an outlier.

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 天前

    It’s less that investment is bad and more that no amount of investments is going to improve general life expectancy if healthcare isn’t affordable, or at all available, for poorer people. I think other countries with more sensible healthcare systems actually greatly benefit from american medical research.

    Also damn, didn’t know Germany’s life expectancy is that much worse than than even countries like UK and Belgium that aren’t exactly known for healthy living or good public policies.

    • arudesalad@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 天前

      The UK used to have one of the best healthcare systems in the world. If we don’t fix it soon I’d imagine our life expectancy is going to drop soon.

    • Yozul@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 天前

      Almost all health care research in the US was funded by the NIH. So, uh, oops. The very tiny amount of research that pharmaceutical companies do with their own money is just excuses for extending patents on profitable drugs. Real research has always been funded with taxpayer money, even in the US. That isn’t even included in that chart for how expensive US healthcare is, either.

    • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 天前

      I mean… the scale starts at 78 and ends at 85. It’s incredibly misrepresentative.

      • boydster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 天前

        …it’s a life expectancy plot, are you really interested in all the dead space? I think the person making the graph expects a certain level of general literacy and contextual awareness to grasp the reason neither axis starts at 0

      • Hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 天前

        graphs with scales that don’t start at zero are not fundamentally misleading. There are no countries included with zero health spending or zero life expectancy.

        What may be more misleading is the choice of which countries to include and reject. But a lack of a white space because humans live a long time regardless of circumstances isn’t a substantive criticism of this chart.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 天前

        i think its pretty fair and standard to do that for ages, and more than that average ages that represent lifespan where tiny differences can have a lot of meaning

        (also hi to my favorite admin ❤️)

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 天前

      yea das why i put “radical” before “investment”

      im sure someone smarter than me could explain a middle ground where investment is perfectly lovely but the way we do it? painandsuffering.jpeg

  • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 天前

    The main problem is comparing America to other wealthy liberal democracies. We’re closer to lower income countries with far more authoritarian governments at this point, and we’ll only get closer with time. Comparisons to Russia and China would also be quite apt, as they’re in similar imperial positions.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 天前

      Cuban has a higher life expectancy, and would be off the left side for cost. Turns out if you use your authoritarianism to force all the people who want to be doctors to go to college and become doctors, you get shittons of healthcare.

        • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 天前

          I mean, you’re kind of right? It is much worse for black women though. The rate’s of infant and maternal mortality are shockingly higher for them, let alone other health outcomes. As well you’ve got the case of Adriana Smith, which yes, could absolutely happen to a white woman. However, it’s not really surprising the case they used to normalise the concept was a black woman.

          • traceur301@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 天前

            the whole culture of medicine is infected with conservative quacks whose first line of treatment for non-white-men is trying to convince patients they don’t need treatment

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 天前

      1 US year is 0.95 EU years just like how 1 woman dollar is 85 man cents

  • azolus@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 天前

    Don’t worry guys, we’re folding to MAGA pressure in the EU and our conservative parties are working hard to privatize our healthcare so it can be just as shitty as yours.