• алсааас [she/they]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Aren’t they mostly focusing on r*pe and incest content?

    OFC it’s not good for payment providers to exercise this much power over content restrictions, like they already did on Steam

    • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      27 days ago

      Even if they were (They’re not actually) that would still be bad. Apart from the fact that nobody is hurt by the existence of incest porn and plenty of people are into CNC and pornographic fantasy content featuringremoved in a way that also doesnt hurt anybody, more objectionable material will always be the wedge they use to allow them to enforce puritanical standards that will come for queen people.

    • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      27 days ago

      No. And they’ve got a long history of just outright dishonesty regarding the content they claim they’re fighting. For example; going after media with critical depictions of domestic abuse by claiming it promotes it. A lie that would be totally nonesensical to anyone who has watched or played said media, until you realise that they’re a sockpuppet org for the extreme fundamentalist Christian rightwing that absolutely does not give a shit about the sexual exploitation, abuse, or oppression of women.