• Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well I guess there wouldn’t be much of a “male lonelyness epidemic” for one.

    I guess we found our solution, instead of going back in time and killing Reagan we need to make a gaygun and go back in time to give it to him!

    • woodenghost [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Even if everyone was suddenly turned gay, having grown up in a patriarchal society might still leave many cis men unable to express their emotions, form meaningful connections and do anything effective about their loneliness.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        yes, at first and for a long time while the perceived need for machismo gradually fades away.

        hetero-normative social expectations & toxic masculinity are the biggest sources of fuel for male loneliness and the remaining parts can become manageable in a gay dominated world as it becomes clearer and clearer that there will be fewer and fewer people to exploit in search of the capitalist profit motive; thus slowly eliminating the 3rd largest fuel source for loneliness.

        • Chapo_is_Red [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          yes, at first and for a long time while the perceived need for machismo gradually fades away.

          I don’t think it necessarily would fade away in those circumstances. You can have gay patriarchy. It’d be different than hetero patriarchy, but patriarchy is patriarchy.

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            very true, but i’m betting that it’s not going to take the same toxic form that it has now.

          • woodenghost [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yes, I guess the economic reasons for patriarchy would still be there. Splitting productive wage labor from unpaid labor that reproduces the ability to work would still be helpful to capital.