Also find me on sh.itjust.works and Lemmy.world!

https://sh.itjust.works/u/lka1988
https://lemmy.world/u/lka1988

  • 1 Post
  • 570 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 18th, 2024

help-circle



















  • It certainly doesn’t cost more than an under-screen display where you need to both engineer a tiny screen of less dense see-through pixes AND the right setup to counter the blur you induce on the software side.

    But that’s my point. It’s cheaper to just build the screen around the camera.

    See what I did there? The camera never removed screen real estate. The screen never had that real estate to begin with, unless it was engineered in a way that allowed it, which is not common yet.

    I used to hate the notch - until I bought a OnePlus 6. Only then did I understand that the camera didn’t cut into the screen, rather the screen grew around the camera. The holepunch is an evolution of that. Apple made it work for them with the whole “dynamic island” thing, and at this point nobody really seems to care about the cutouts anymore anyway. Except for a few overly vocal morons online.

    Don’t get me wrong here - I’m not arguing for holepunches and notches to stay forever, and progress in that area should be appreciated and more widely adopted. That said, I’m getting really fucking tired of seeing the same “holepunch/notch bad because Xperia exists” argument hashed out over and over again. That Xperia is $1500, and the fact that it’s not a Galaxy or iPhone puts it at a massive disadvantage already. The average person has never heard of Xperia devices, and refusing to consider that viewpoint puts your argument at an even further disadvantage.