From what I’ve read monthsl’s worth of Claude queries through github copilot is estimated to have the same carbon footprint as driving 12 miles.
I do not care about IP law. My greater concern is how this stuff furthers consolidation in the tech industry.
People focus on Claude code because it’s a massive improvement over the previous models. The difference between gpt 4.1 and Claude 4 is palpable. (Claude code is really just a particular interface for using Claude 4, though that interface does add some juice beyond just the model the same way that copilot does.)
You make an excellent point in the analogy between c and assembly.
Part of it is I think the current companies are extremely consolidated. Why would they want to make something new? They are only interested in strangling their remaining customers.
On his Facebook page you can see him posting stuff a few years ago in favor of public transit and in 2019 he attended a may day protest and a pro immigration protest. I think this dude is just a disingenuous clout chaser.
You’re literally in the android community dingus
It seems like you didn’t read the post.
You are badly misunderstanding many worlds theory.
What do you think “parallel universe theory” is?
“many worlds hypothesis” in quantum physics is nothing like Sci fi “parallel universe” stuff. Sci fi is fiction. Don’t get your understanding of science from Sci fi.
I mean I def agree with you about SAFe being garbage. And a lot of what you say I agree with or am open to.
But if you’re not against tracking tasks or governance what do you think the solution is?
I def agree that the incentives of enterprise is a big part of the issue.
As a designer I’ve found it hard to work with some devs because they don’t believe my work is real, or worth tracking in the same systems they track their work in. They’d prefer me to kind of hang on the outside and make pretty graphics at the whim of them and the product manager (they usually think of the design process as a coat of paint applied after the real work has been done, so that it can look attractive to stakeholders up stream. But in fact design is not primarily about aesthetics or “look and feel”)
And how do you expect to build a design system without some kind of task tracking or governance process?
Certainly it’s an issue how product people get to control these mm processes but that’s an implementation thing.
I find that multi blade razors work better on slightly longer hair but for really longer hair I would need an electric. When I go from fully bearded to clean shaven I usually run a pass with electric, then multi bladed, then safety razor.
I wouldn’t say that there’s a clear 1:1 advantage of safety razors over multi blade razors. Certainly the locked in business model of most multi blade razors is bad but there are generics you can get out there. Safety razors do have their advantages but I’ve found they have trouble with longer hair which in my experience usually requires an electric razor to chop down.
Honestly you sound kind of toxic to work with. I agree with some of what you’ve said but there’s like zero capacity for self criticism displayed here.
Where do you see designers playing a role in all this, for instance?
Krita is more focused on painting but it has most of the same features as gimp.
Skeets
New update coming for that soon!
Gimp sucks. Krita is way better.
These aren’t mutually exclusive terms.
Durov is the world’s most obvious asset lmao
Very interesting! I didn’t realize there was this historical division between fortran and c. I thought c was just “better” because it came later.