Or even just the basic rules of math itself? Identity rule, Inverse rules, Commutative property, Associative property, Distributive property… There’s a lot of rules that prove and create stable ground for you to accept and understand PEMDAS/BODMAS.

Simply knowing one thing doesn’t prove that one thing.

All of these “rules” come up when you learn order of operations and have nothing to do with “advanced math classes”.

This shower thought seems grounded heavily in ignorance of math.

I think they all think it’s the legacy girls.

I guess because the colors are blue and pink that they’re going to somehow breed? But the “in game” answer is that it’s your characters “inspiration”.

Breed horse girls to create even better horse girls

I love how everyone believes that there’s breeding in this game… If you think there’s breeding… it’s literally in your head. You’re the problem.

Poland requires DigitalID or PESEL (National Identification Number, kinda like SSN for the yanks) number.

Puposefully destroying other people’s property is absolutely a crime with many applicable laws.

Okay? And that is equally bad. What’s the point? We should be striving for less IMO.

Now realize those things are internet connected… and that video was definitely uploaded.

I rather not need mass surveillance to buy a fucking snickers.

Yes, but as a custom notification channel on the IT OPs channel. That’s where we send system alerts. Outage notifications, script notices, etc…

Just so happens that I’m the god of gluttony.

I’ve only ever played borderlands solo…

I do have a wife. I pulled up our current budget and looked. We’d have to cut a couple of things but I could make it work pretty easily. It’s the kids that would make it actually hard. But at this point they’re spoiled enough. They’ll live (they can live without food right?).

Edit: missed an entire word.

Edit 2: the real answer is that you can consume more than 47k… if you have to spend an extra 5k a year, you could keep doing that for the rest of your life and be fine… you’ll just make a little less each year until you exhaust the 1m… but you’ll likely die before you do.

Example…

At 55k/yr, you’ll exhaust at year 43. Which the kids would be long gone out the house by then which would lighten the consumption again… so really probably longer. Would probably last 60+ years as long as you maintain some frugality…

Edit3: This does assume that costs don’t rise (fat luck here)… that the 4.66 is static (which it’s not… and can go up or down)… etc… You could also invest in “riskier things” with higher returns to get more money… general market returns can be higher and are only a minor “risk”.

High yield savings is currently at 4.66% at best right now…

With just 1 million in a bank account… That’s 47k a year in interest. Considering that I don’t need to work in this scenario (And thus wouldn’t need a car, and all the other costs that come with needing to maintain stuff for a job)… I could probably make that work for the rest of my life.

So now… I’m supposed to manage company assets and workers private assets on company paid infrastructure? In what world is this a sane feature request? Who green-lit this?

As a default behavior this is stupid as shit. I could see this being an “added benefit” optionally. Not that I’d ever want to use it personally… but backup storage is a cost and some people don’t want to pay it.

Uh… Well, no? I mean you can go see for yourself. Click an article. Media is there. https://library.kiwix.org/viewer#wikipedia_en_all_maxi_2024-01/A/User:The_other_Kiwix_guy/Landing

I don’t know exactly what subsets of stuff this is, as I know that wikipedia is about 1/2 petabyte total data all in. But this specific zim export is all English articles with some media. I believe that ALL the English articles is about 50GB and the other 55-ish GB is just media. It’s definitely cutdown, but not devoid.

Wikipedia is 109.89GB… You could have enough space on your phone that you’re reading this post on.

Download your own copy of wikipedia.

https://library.kiwix.org/#lang=eng is one of many tools out there that can help you get a copy and even get it running in docker.

More copied of the data, less possible to take it all down.

Uhhh… Grassley is R-IA… He’s GOP.

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/about/members

Well I can see this in 2 ways from her video alone.

1. We don’t see what came up before the video started rolling. If the dude was following her around for a bit (thus giving her time to actually pull out the phone and start recording) this could actually be warranted. She still looks stupid for posting this without the context prior because the video in of itself doesn’t favor her IMO… But it could make sense on why someone who is magically concerned with what town halls she’ll be participating in (a google search away, or call her office rather than harassing her directly) would actually approach her, identify her, engage her in questions, start talking about town halls (why would this just come out without any context?), then continuously repeat the question after the video started rolling? She still looks bad for talking shit to a (presumably) constituent… but this could be deep in the “creep” territory.

2. She’s straight up looney tunes and there is no relevant context… She’s off her rocker and talks bad about her people to their face for asking simple questions even though she’s “off hours” while shopping, even though this is bad form on the guys part. Which will hopefully get her fired. Without some additional context, this is the only sane take to have only watching this video though, which is how she posted it.

Now, it turns out that there is more context as the guy was recording the “full conversation” which is odd. He clearly ambushed her with the question and was recording the whole thing from start to end which shows some intent. https://x.com/i/status/1913710641438675421

Unknown: Of course! (there was another person that was kind of in frame, no idea who said “of course” or what they said it about)
Him: Nancy?
Nancy: Yes.
Him: When are you going to host a real town hall for the people?
Nancy: Did you miss the 15 I had last year?
Him: That wasn’t a town … When are you going to host one this year?
Nancy: I’ve already had one and I’ll have a dozen more.
Him: The town hall you hosted this year was not a town hall. Let’s be real.
Nancy: Uhh, (starts grabbing phone to start recording, likely realizing that he’s recording at this point) it was a town hall and I do them every year.
<The twitter video linked from Nancy starts>

Now… we don’t know how long he was following her, but clearly long enough that he thought he should start to record the whole interaction before he even “knew” it was her which is pretty shady. He even preloaded the response to “I’ve already had one this year” and started to say it when it wasn’t a valid answer to her response. “That wasn’t a town [hall]” is not really a valid answer to “did you miss the 15 I had last year”. He was expecting her to talk about the “last” town hall and whiffed the response, we even see him break it out again when she finally does bring up the most recent town hall.

Now I think her response was still bad. Her video definitely doesn’t paint her in good light. However, she likely picked up on his intent… likely caught him following her already, and he was likely putting up some body language that would have helped identify his intent that we can’t see on his view. Then the pointed questions, preloaded responses, and general hostile question/response with “that was not a town hall”… He wasn’t “just asking a question”, which is what people hide behind in these situations. He was pushing an agenda which is clear by his line of questioning, he was clearly following her (had already identified her as he decided he should be recording), and ambushed her while she’s trying to pick out shampoo at a store. He’s clearly and strongly in the wrong.

Now having said all that… She’s just a fucking moron. This still makes her look like shit even though he’s clearly antagonizing it. She could have had even an ounce of tact and respect for the man and instead of going on this whole tirade, simply stated “Well I’ve answered your question, I’ll have probably a dozen more town halls this year and you can contact my office to get the specific dates… Can I get back to my shopping so I can go home and feed my kids?”. That would have outright made him to look like the lunatic he was, and not made her look like a complete jackass. Instead she ramped up 10000% the moment she had her phone out and that gave her literally no context for her video outside of “I’m an asshole”. But alas, both sides (gasp, yes! BOTH SIDES!) are lunatics it seems. And I’ll be down-voted for saying it.

Edit: Oh, and to be clear… I have no fucking clue who this is prior to this video. I’m only just learning that she’s a rep from South Carolina?

Edit2: fixed a formatting thing I just noticed.

Edit3: From a news article… someone else posted here.

A day earlier, she called out “deranged town hall fakers” who were calling her office about ditching the March town hall in her district.

So yeah… at this point I HAVE to elaborate on how squarely in the wrong he is. It’s hard to not look at him as a concerted effort to harass her, asking that question in the way that he asked it just after a bunch of calls to her office? What are the chances? This doesn’t excuse her behavior… but it does rationalize HOW she got to her response a bit. Still makes her look like absolute shit… too much emotion, rather than just doing the damn job with grace/dignity. But anyone who defends this man as “just asking a question” is just not looking at the facts of the situation. This was harassment, and she showed no grace in return. I’d personally want better qualities in my law makers.

Well… You’ll at the very least wish that you had a car.

But it’s a good game. Try it. Find out. :)

Nope, it wasn’t… Even then though, the game is old enough that we can no longer assume that people have even played the game anymore. Kids are using the internet that would have been born after FO:NV. There are likely some 20 year olds on this site that have never played it because they would have been too young.