By “regress”, I mean essentially to de-evolve. The opposite of progress. Nature does not allow for backwards evolution. Everything moves towards natural adaptation. Never away from it.

A purely cave dwelling fish doesn’t need sight. So, over time- it will lose its sight in favor or other senses, such as smell or the ability to sense sound waves and motion. Also, eyes can be a disadvantage to them as they no longer need to devote energy to a useless sense.

That’s considered an adaptation. So, no. It didn’t de-evolve. It adapted to its environment and over time, shed a useless function.

This isn’t something that falls under the appeal to nature fallacy. You’ll note that I never said humanity is better because it’s natural. In fact, I don’t think I applied any form of gradation to it at all. I simply said that evolutionary science states that nature doesn’t regress. However, I don’t believe that evolutionary science considered that AI would remove common sense and rationality from the process.

So, consider your “natural/unnatural fallacy” un-called out by reason of irrelevance.

The dumbing of human beings as a result of AI is a foregone conclusion. It is said that nature cannot regress on its own, but AI is not natural. And therefore, there is no future in which through AI, we achieve anything more than our own end.

Care to repeat that in English??

He could have been anything at that point. His political affiliation doesn’t need to match his behavior if his only purpose is to unwittingly die for a failed-attempt to grab a few votes.

You seriously believe that wasn’t staged? That patsy’s second to his last thought was about how he’d spend all the money he was promised….

… his last thought was interrupted by the bullet passing through it.

Sleep is a reaction of being awake.

I’d love to know what medications or drugs that tool is using.

Nowadays for me, the term “liberal” just means not an idiot wannabe-socialist/communist, and not a trump-worshiping minion.

It’s not surprising that a wannabe-communist wouldn’t know what apologia means.

You missed the reason for the post. Dude has a hard-on for banning “genocidal liberals”

He’s up Putin’s ass regardless of the topic, so that’s a non-starter.

per cApiTa!

lol… per capita. Apologia at its finest.

“China is perfect!” - said the communist.

Because the narrative can be edited so easily to result in whatever outcome makes your argument for you.

It’s not empirical, it’s simply an amplifier for whatever agenda is warranted by it.

China isn’t capitalist and is factually the largest contributor by far to global warming across the globe. Sure, the US is second on the list, but after that, it’s quite far down before capitalism appears again.

Capitalism may suck, but it dilutes the water to pin nonsense like this on it when there’s actual arguments against it that merit real consideration.

I too love satire. But I think you might be leaning a bit too far into it. It’s hard to tell you’re joking.

Ahh yes, the cowardly .ml “Rule 1”. Just vague enough to not have to bother explaining themselves to anyone…

It’s no surprise that the clowns that run that shitshow seem to run it as if it were the Kremlin.

Anything Google, but it’s not because of their advertising- it’s just because of who they are.

100%