Boise_Idaho [null/void, any]

rotato-chip Capital city of Idaho rotato-chip

  • 1 Post
  • 504 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 8th, 2024

help-circle

  • I see the unwillingness or inability to exert military power as a better indicator that they’re not willing to challenge the current hegemon than having poor grasps of MMT economics. Every single one of your economists can be Hudson-pilled, but if no one is willing to militarily stand up to the hegemon, then those Hudson-pilled economists will be quietly sidelined anyways since actually implementing those Hudson-pilled economic and fiscal policies will invite direct response from the hegemon. After all, the US is not going to passively stand there if they can no longer get their free lunch from the rest of the world.









  • BynarsAreOk is a contrarian first and foremost. They would probably start whining about anarkiddies being Western chauvinists falling for CIA color revolutions if they were actually on Db0. The extent in which half of their comment history is about China is contrarianism because Hexbear is aggressively pro-China. If Hexbear was as aggressively pro-Russia as it were pro-China, BynarsAreOk’s comment history would be filled with whining about how Putin spits on the grave of Lenin or how the RF completely rides on the coattails of the SU instead of whining about Xi and the CPC. Notice that BynarsAreOk does whine about Putin spitting on the grave of Lenin and the RF completely riding on the coattails of the SU, but it’s not to the extent of their China whining since Hexbear isn’t really aggressively pro-Russia or really pro-Russia at all.




  • The 21st century leftists cannot imagine a future without electoralism

    One of the truly blessed things about the Chinese revolution is that electoralism and nonviolence have never taken up root whatsoever. Throughout the entirety of the Century of Humiliation, every single Chinese person or org of note understood that the only way to overthrow the old regime or kick out the imperialist was through violence. None of that voting or nonviolence bullshit that plagued every other liberatory movement in existence. There was no Bloody Sunday or no March of Return with Chinese characteristics because Chinese people weren’t stupid enough to think nonviolence would somehow work. Nor was there any serious attempt to solve problems by voting. Chinese people’s attempt at combating imperialism was forming ad hoc bands of dudes with primitive rifles and melee weapons. They did not succeed, but at least they actually tried something instead of voting or nonviolence. Even the May Fourth movement, characterized as an intellectual movement, was riotous where people burned down residences.



  • I personally think most election posts aren’t meaningful because most elections aren’t meaningful in the grand scheme of things. I mostly skim over election posts unless they’re about countries I have little knowledge of. The only noteworthy one is how MAS split between Morales and Arce because the speed in which support of MAS collapsed overnight when Morales disassociated himself from the party is yet another indictment against electoralism. Morales is ultimately supported by a mass Indigenous movement while MAS went from being a vanguard party of sorts to yet another bourgeois party.

    Everything else like the DPP floundering in lawfare or Corbyn starting a new party isn’t very meaningful in the grand scheme of things. To use my two examples, there isn’t a real path forward for Taiwanese separatism anyways and Corbyn’s party will most likely not succeed in the end nor be as impactful as Palestine Action. The recent French election where so many people here were hyping up the results amounted to a wet fart since Macron didn’t have to step down.