

I see the unwillingness or inability to exert military power as a better indicator that they’re not willing to challenge the current hegemon than having poor grasps of MMT economics. Every single one of your economists can be Hudson-pilled, but if no one is willing to militarily stand up to the hegemon, then those Hudson-pilled economists will be quietly sidelined anyways since actually implementing those Hudson-pilled economic and fiscal policies will invite direct response from the hegemon. After all, the US is not going to passively stand there if they can no longer get their free lunch from the rest of the world.
ICE has been loosening requirements for new recruits, which means they perceive a shortage in manpower. The question is whether they’re trying to recruit more people in anticipation of greater resistance or if they’re being desperate because they can’t handle the resistance that’s already on the ground.