I work at Apple in the Apple Care department, but not for the Apple Care yalls moms call for help. This has been happening for literally years and I’ve spoken about it before but no one really took it seriously but now here we are. We were told that we be in a hiring freeze for the foreseeable future and that hiring and promotions would only happen onsite. If we wanted to be promoted we needed to move to Austin or San Fran, the two most expensive cities in the country with no guarantee of a promotion, on our own dime, knowing we won’t make a living wage there. Keep in mind that this meeting was being given to a massive department who’s main workforce is and has always been WFH.
This type of crap should be mega illegal. I feel like I see this all the time. I don’t know how you would ever prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they are actually “laying people off” tho which I presume means it’s unfortunately gonna stick around as a method for companies to avoid severance which sucks.
Also, not for nothing but San Fran and Austin are definitely not two most expensive cities in the country. San Fran is kinda up there. Maybe like top 5 in some lists. I legitimately couldn’t find Austin in a single one but I only checked up to like the top 25 or 30 cities.
Hiring freeze? I had an Apple recruiter reach out to me just a couple weeks ago. That’s in EU though. They weren’t happy that I was not willing to relocate for them.
lol “San Fran”
deleted by creator
No one from San Francisco calls it San Fran, and when people do it’s an instant dog whistle for all bay area-ers to dog pile on them
The commenter didn’t claim to be from San Fran, he was bitching about being made to move there. So of course he, like me, doesn’t give a shit what folks from San Fran call it.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Apple is fucked beyond repair
Why? Is it out of warranty period? 🤔
deleted by creator
On Lemmy, any Apple thread is mostly hatred towards them. Nerds even swarm in on the communities setup to talk about Apple products.
Apple stans have the iq of simple jack
Simple (Headphone) Jack
Don’t worry, Texas has importing tech workers since around COVID and it’s only a matter of time until they import enough new voters to fundamentally change laws down there…
I worry that tech bros who live in Texas will be way more susceptible to the ancap mind virus than they are now
Tech workers are not the same thing as tech bros. Musk is a tech bro and would be incapable of working as a tech worker.
deleted by creator
It’s not 1:1, but there’s a lot of overlap. I’m not as worried about the tech workers who aren’t tech bros, they’ll probably just get into barbecue.
If you worry you could start off by not calling them derogatory term like tech bros 🤷♂️
Might be a good start.
I don’t think that’s effective, but thank you for the heartfelt advice.
Not if they keep up with their gerrymandering, it’d take a shit load of tech bros to counteract gerrymandering.
Guess what, AWS is setting up their second HQ in Texas, so Texas is going to get a lot of people relocating from the west coast once that’s all finished. Guess what, they generally like to vote and be involved in local politics.
deleted by creator
That’s just not true, people will make choices for material benefit even knowing the state of politics bc they believe its not as bad as it is and that they can ignore it. If you live in one of the big 4 texas cities, you mostly can.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Former Apple employee (retail, then corporate). I’m shocked that Tim Cook, an out gay man, would allow such a move. Texas is a hellhole. This is bullshit. Fuck Apple for this one.
You think Tim Cook, billionaire CEO of a wildly anti-consumer company, gives a shit about anyone but himself?
I’ve got a bridge to sell you.
I’m interested in a bridge. What’s it like?
It has ups and downs
He is a capitalist billionaire which means he has more allegiance with $$$
deleted by creator
I’ve met multiple out gay people who aren’t LGBT friendly (or, more commonly, aren’t ‘BT’ friendly) even without the profit motive of being a piece of shit like Tim Cook has.
Being LGBT certainly makes you more likely to take progressive attitudes, but it far from guarantees it.
Tim Cook hates gay people!
Money and greed overrides any sort of class or queer solidarity
A capitalist is a capitalist first, a capitalist second, a capitalist third, and then everything else he is after that. He’d sell the blood of his fellow queers if he thought he could turn a profit.
Tim Cook will never have to live in that fascist state, he only has to donate to watch others suffer from the safety of his Palo Alto home where his rights are respected.
They are just a small startup they can’t afford to pay 121 people on their meager earnings. Hell they can’t even afford to update their phone design in 3 years.
Otherwise known as constructive dismissal. Nasty. But hey, everyone wants that new iPhone amiright?
deleted by creator
The US jurisprudence of take the plea deal or face excessive charges seems to have found a home up Tim Cook’s asshole.
I can’t decide which overused quote to put here so I’m just going to use them both:
“Why did you sting me knowing that we shall both now drown?”
“And then they came for me - and there was no one left to speak for me.”
Did these people ever think Apple cared about them? Did they think their years of hard loyalty would serve as some bargaining chip the second that their precious green arrow was on the line?
I couldnt imagine having ~80 natural years on this earth and dedicating years of my labor to one of the most destructive companies in history and then acting shocked when all of the sudden I was in the line of fire.
Just so we all know who we’re talking about, Apple is the company that installed suicide nets on their factories because it was the cheapest way to prevent their workers from killing themselves which was a frequent enough problem on its own to warrant a solution.
I think it’s more complicated than that, my friend.
Not many people have the luxury of choosing an occupation that aligns with their ideals. A person may have taken a job at Apple out of necessity because it’s all that was offered, or perhaps to maintain their legal status in the country (H-1B visa), or because they have burgeoning student debts, or maybe they were as yet unaware of the corporate trend towards employee exploitation.
Anyway, putting on the blame on the one’s being laid off instead of on the one’s laying off is not helping anyone except the C-suite of Apple.
Yes exactly, you can’t blame the people being laid off, they are just trying to live and I imagine a job at a company like Apple was a dream. I mean you can’t blame anyone who takes that opportunity, the salary, the credentials. The US workers really need to get the union situation sorted out in a major way.
I imagine a job at a company like Apple was a dream.
To bastardize George Carlin, it’s a dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.
Again, the Apple corporation has done more harm to the Earth and society than almost any other entity in history. I don’t make that accusation lightly and I have very little sympathy for anyone who had deluded themselves into believing that they’d never get eaten by the beast they raised.
Hyperbole much? More damaging than Union Carbide? DuPont? Exxon? BP?
I think you may have made that accusation lightly, or at least without careful consideration.
Again, the Apple corporation has done more harm to the Earth and society than almost any other entity in history.
You seem to have missed it last time so I highlighted it for you.
When you’re that close to the top, the lines of delineation get a little fuzzy but in short, I don’t think Apple gets a pass because they might have killed a little less people than British Petroleum.
You know what I mean though. A “dream” job.
deleted by creator
I dont understand how anyone can blame the workers and not the fucking corporations exploiting them.
Unfortunately it’s more likely that people are going to get burnt, Appl is going to get out of it just fine 😠
deleted by creator
Sometimes it’s as simple as a shitty company being the only company willing to pay you to do what you want to do.
deleted by creator
I mean, people can work at a large company like Apple just for the salary. It’s pretty naive to assume any or all of those laid off worked at Apple long-term and were loyal to their employer because of the marketing prestige.
I don’t disagree but this sort of “so apparently THIS is how Apple treats us” thing just screams “I never thought leopards would eat MY face.”
I don’t think that’s the point of the post. Layoffs are inevitable for most companies, especially tech companies. The point is to draw attention to layoffs which are being obfuscated (presumably to avoid announcing layoffs). That’s to do with a bad business practice by a huge publicly traded entity, not their responsibility as an employer to do right by their employees
The complaint is Apple starting out of the bad press by doing soft layoffs like this. Literally everyone in tech right now is aware that they can get laid off, as has been happening to hundreds of thousands of workers the last two full years.
People are just trying to make the best of this situation we have to experience called life. I used to work for smaller companies and they have pros and cons just like large companies. Then I was laid off and the only place that would hire me and not give me a pay cut was a large corporation. So here I am now. Let me be clear, I do not want to work for this company. But what they provide me for the time being, is stability where other companies are laying people off left and right. They hired me as a remote employee and then a few months later said everyone had to return to the office a few times a week. I don’t trust this company and I never did, but until the economy stabilizes and I can find another solid job, I’m stuck. I can’t just not work, and I refuse to go back to being poor and struggling to stay afloat. So I feel for these people. You don’t always have a reasonable choice in employment when things aren’t stable but you also have to think about supporting yourself or maybe kids.
TLDR: It’s not always so cut and dry of a situation as “don’t work for a shitty company”. All I’m trying to say, is that you should really step back and try to think about these situations from others’ perspectives sometimes.
deleted by creator
one of the most destructive companies in history
Fuck Apple, but come on. It’s not an oil company. It’s not clear cutting forests. It’s not making its revenue from chattel slavery and stealing land. Apple is fucking awful, but it’s not exactly the East India Company.
It’s crazy the downvotes you’re getting when everything you said is true. People don’t like feeling bad for their choices though so when you force them to, just for a second, think about their purchasing power and the harm those choices cause really messes with them. Then they get mad and try to argue about it.
No one thinks they’re wrong, but there are wrong people.
Sadly, most tech companies are doing this, and they’re doing it in a way that frames it as you volunteering to leave, resulting in people losing their job and being able to claim unemployment benefits.
Given how shit the job market is for certain roles (recruitment, especially), it’s a horrid thing to do.
Is it surprising that Apple, like every giant tech company that is way too big, treats its employees like shit? Do we think Google and Microsoft don’t treat employees in a similarly shitty way? Or even any other huge company?
I have no love for Apple, but it seems like OP thinks this is something that makes Apple special. I mean single out Apple for shit like their products being overpriced or their notebooks not having enough RAM for their OS unless you want to pay a premium. This is just (really unfortunately) typical of modern late-stage capitalism.
First, I think it has more to do with OP reacting to the article they linked rather than searching for bad things Apple specifically has done. Second, we can talk about shitty Apple products or policies for ages, but this action in particular isn’t like ‘Oh no, the first-gen AR/VR goggles I bought for $4,000 aren’t making the world literally Ready Player One’. No, this is (one of many) business decision that is directly fucking over their own employees in ways that are threatening to their entire livelihoods; ‘Either uproot your lives and move hundreds of miles away to a place statistically less safe for most of you, or you’re fired’
If this forces you to quit, would it be an option to start initialing a union to get fired, instead of quitting? Forcing them to pay compensations that might be in your contract. Or would this be a bad idea with regard to the references in your résumé? (I’m not from the US.)
Sadly, there is a HUGE anti-union sentiment in tech, almost to a religious degree. I don’t think the tech industry is smart enough to unionise, similarly to the video game industry, who have dealt with equal amounts of shit, yet still plug away in horrible conditions.
With that being said, while I think unions should exist in tech, I truly believe that the likes of Apple and co would gladly kill off 100k jobs and delay launches, if it means killing off union efforts. For it to be effective, it would need to be internationally recognised, have a large enough number of people to make mass firings near impossible without significant business harm, and be solely tied to minimum income equity.
Sadly, there is a HUGE anti-union sentiment in tech, almost to a religious degree. I don’t think the tech industry is smart enough to unionise, similarly to the video game industry, who have dealt with equal amounts of shit, yet still plug away in horrible conditions.
The fact that the pro-union people won’t even try to hide their contempt for the people they claim to represent certainly isn’t helping matters. Unionization involves a lot of trust and union organizers seem unwilling to lift a finger to earn that trust, instead jumping immediately to insults whenever someone doesn’t instantly toe the line.
I truly believe that the likes of Apple and co would gladly kill off 100k jobs and delay launches, if it means killing off union efforts.
I’ve been pondering this and I honestly am not sure… because I can see them being that scared of unionizing, but there’s also the modern capitalist notion, especially in the tech sector, of endless growth. So would they delay launches when it could cost them revenue? I honestly do not know the answer here.
Obviously, I want the tech sector unionized. I just don’t know what exactly Apple and the others would to to stop it. They would do something, and something very nasty. I’m just not sure about mass layoffs and delayed product launches.
is there any case law on whether forced RTO or RTO with relocation counts as constructive dismissal for unemployment purposes?
You’d think a highly profitable company like Apple wouldn’t do this, but yet they do. Absolutely abhorrent
“Why did/how could _________ do this?”
Someone did the math, and this was more profitable.
Large corporations will almost always do whatever it takes to make $1.05 instead of $1.00.
I’m aware of how cold and soulless the system is. It is just that you’d assume the person making the decisions isn’t a robot.
deleted by creator
How is this even legal?
deleted by creator
Is what your mum said when she saw your face for the first time.
That’s what I would’ve said. Have you seen a newborn? They look like a ballsack with a mouth.
Capital One is doing similar right now.
deleted by creator
