Lemmy.one
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
CoolerOpposide [none/use name]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years ago

China is destroying the environment destroying industry, but at what cost?

hexbear.net

message-square
63
fedilink
140

China is destroying the environment destroying industry, but at what cost?

hexbear.net

CoolerOpposide [none/use name]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
63
fedilink

Link to the post

  • SpoopyKing@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    The solution to cars isn’t greener cars. It’s replacing cars with something else completely, like human powered vehicles or multi-passenger transport. /c/fuck_cars has the right idea

    • Riffraffintheroom [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 years ago

      human powered vehicles

      This phrasing made by brain fly over bikes and land on Flintstones cars.

      • ikilledtheradiostar [comrade/them, love/loves]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s because the car propaganda is so strong.

      • CombatLiberalism [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        yeonmi-park In Communist North Korea the passengers get out and push the trains

    • iridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      Correct but that is not why the EU is doing this.

    • doublepepperoni [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      human powered vehicles

      I am pessimistically imagining Musk and Bezos carried in giant glitzy palanquins

      • FALGSConaut [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        No no no, you gotta be optimistic about imagining Musk and Bezos being publically [redacted] by their palanquin bearers

      • envis10n [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I read glitzy as glizzy

    • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I agree, but we can’t replace cars entirely anyway, which is why prioritizing public transportation while also improving personal vehicles is what China does. It’s just that they’re making their cars affordable as well as their trains and buses, while Europeans get angry that their shit is so expensive

    • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      The solution is to not leave fusion investment in the tentacles of power-crazed cyborgs.

      • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        actually there are massive government research facilities into fusion power and France and the UK work with China on that one. It just hasn’t panned out yet

        • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I actually worked on the US’ omnishambolic ICF project. Even they joke about it always being 20 years away.

          • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            The impression I got is that there is interest and funding it’s just very difficult

            • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Well yes, the current issue is that the systems were designed way ahead of the computational power to assess how the plasma would behave in such conditions so dealing with fluid instabilities that arises from the most microscopic of target asymmetriea occupies the bulk of their time.

              If they had another 4 billion dollars to build the system entirely from scratch I actually think they could get fusion based on what they know now. But they don’t and it works for weapons complex integration with is in the end what the DOE cares about so yeah

      • YouKnowIt [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Power-crazed cyborgs would never invest in that, it’s all government funded. Our benevolent technocratic overlords are like the pharma companies, they’ll just leap on it like rabid pitbulls after it’s developed to make as much money as possible

the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net
lock
Community locked: only moderators can create posts. You can still comment on posts.

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 4 users / week
  • 25 users / month
  • 83 users / 6 months
  • 7 local subscribers
  • 16K subscribers
  • 3.82K Posts
  • 79.7K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • KiaKaha [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • MiraculousMM [he/him, undecided]@hexbear.net
  • corgiwithalaptop [any, love/loves]@hexbear.net
  • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • replaceable [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • CARCOSA [mirror/your pronouns]@hexbear.net
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org