• Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Where did you find this info? I found this “Battery storage is planned as well, with as much as 600 megawatts eventually possible if approved” which assuming it’s 600MWh, it’ll provide less than an hour worth of energy. But even 3GWh covers only 4 hours.

      • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Would that not be 4 hours of not consuming non-renewables? Like not burning so much coal is a good thing no?

        Are we arguing about the measure of progress in the United States? Cuz buddy I’ll take any progress at this point.

        • Mihies@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Are we arguing? I thought we were talking 🤷 . Yes, but that also means that the rest of the time the energy has to come from somewhere. Like a coal power plant or similar. So this photovoltaic power plant is not a complete replacement for old power plant, but more like a partial one while still relying of fossil fuel, especially during winter and cloudy days.

          • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            56 minutes ago

            Sorry, I might have gotten a little defensive there.

            My point is if it supplements their energy consumption with cleaner energy it’s a good thing.

            Even if its for a couple minutes or a couple hours its a positive improvement.