• Mihies@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Are we arguing? I thought we were talking 🤷 . Yes, but that also means that the rest of the time the energy has to come from somewhere. Like a coal power plant or similar. So this photovoltaic power plant is not a complete replacement for old power plant, but more like a partial one while still relying of fossil fuel, especially during winter and cloudy days.

    • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 minutes ago

      We typically use more power during the day (industry, mostly), so the solar helps us reduce carbon based infrastructure need even without batteries. And it’s just a baby step in the progression to renewables. Yes, we have a long way to go.

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        35 seconds ago

        As all the world has. If we really want to prevent CO2 (and other bad) emissions, we need energy storage and a lot of it. Or nuclear. That said, these are steps (without proper energy storage) in right direction, but only as long as they replace energy from fossil fuel power plants.

    • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Sorry, I might have gotten a little defensive there.

      My point is if it supplements their energy consumption with cleaner energy it’s a good thing.

      Even if its for a couple minutes or a couple hours its a positive improvement.