• CAVOK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Sad but not unexpected. The EU doesn’t do influence operations but its adversaries does. I will not be surprised when it comes out that both Russia and the US invested heavily in getting Iceland to vote no.

    A shame that they didn’t even want to talk, but at least Trump and Putin got their wish.

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The EU shouldn’t come to the protection of countries that actively reject them then (this includes Greenland who left in 1983).

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It doesn’t. EU doesn’t even protect its members. EU doesn’t have any army or common defense policy. Maybe you’re confusing it with NATO?

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          " This assistance can, for example, range from diplomatic support and technical or medical assistance to civilian or military aid, among others."

          So it’s “assistance”, not “defense” mechanism. Each member can decide what type of assistance they will provide but they are not mandated to “protect” anyone. That’s what NATO is for.

          • kossa@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            The EU article is even stronger. NATO Article 5 says

            shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that […] each of them […] will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking […] such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force

            “deeming necessary” can be anything, really.

            The EU one states

            If a Member State is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other Member States shall have towards it an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power

            Having an “obligation” and being obligated to use “all the means in their power” is stronger than the “deeming necessary” of the NATO.

  • anonymouspl@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I read very I interesting interview with a fisherman from Iceland. He said that he wanted to join the EU in the past but now it is „economic prison” and he doesn’t want to join it. To me - it really looks like we are loosing propaganda battle with huge empires spreading propaganda against the eu aggressively without our response. No idea how to change that but I spent half of the morning thinking about it with no result. It really is not based on merit. Like most of politics nowadays. We have the highest standard of living, strong economy etc. Yes - we are getting weaker by sending shit tones of money to our adversaries for LNG which we literally just burn but we can counter that.

  • troed@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I get the fear around the fishing industry, but regardless of Iceland’s dependance on them we all need to stop eating fish. We’re completely wrecking the ocean ecosystems - it’s not sustainable.

    I’d love to have Iceland fully join us in the EU.

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That won’t happen for a generation, and by then, the EU may be a new Warsaw Pact ruled by decree from Moscow or something.

      • HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        15 hours ago

        lol. russia will be rebuilding for the next generation or two. They wont be ruling anything except their own potato fields

        • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          That would be so if Agent Krasnov hadn’t squandered NATO’s defensive weapons on a stock manipulation scheme in the Hormuz Strait. Russia could bombard Berlin or Brussels with ballistic missiles (of which it has a growing surplus) in the same way it is bombarding Kyiv, as there are no more Patriot interceptors and won’t be.

          • Kissaki@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 hours ago

            While the ballistic missiles certainly damage Kyiv and its people, they haven’t pushed them into surrender. I don’t see how spreading out the ballistic missiles Russia has to more countries, who will then join the war more actively, would help them.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It’s really hard to tell where things are going from here (one important but difficult question being which European countries will or won’t go full Nazi), but that is not happening. The Eastern Bloc was the result of aggressive industrialization and modernization during the interwar period by the USSR; Putin isn’t interested in anything like that (because it requires not being tremendously corrupt) and nobody interested in anything like that is in a position to succeed him.

  • Štěpán@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 hours ago

    well of course the fishing industry us scared because they are disgusting whale murderers.

    • Klostein@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      From what I know, it’s only one guy who still does that and most of the meat becomes dog food

      • Štěpán@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        yes but the country is not only unable to stop him but its authorities are actively helping.

        This is an update from the Captain Paul Watson Foundation whose detained ship I saw in Reykjavik when I was there three weeks ago.

        5d ago

        BANDERO UPDATE!

        Five crew members have now been deported from Iceland following weeks of detention and immigration proceedings. They’ve been released thanks to your pressure and email so THANK YOU!

        One crew member, the Bandero’s chief engineer, remains detained.The vessel itself also remains seized and under the control of Icelandic authorities.

        On August 17, the Bandero was towed from Reykjavík to Akranes, where she remains today.For weeks, members of the crew faced uncertainty, detention and limited access to communication. In some cases, crew members waited approximately 48 hours before they were able to contact their families and confirm they were safe. Several have now returned home without their phones and other personal belongings, which remain in the possession of Icelandic authorities as part of the ongoing investigation.

        The Captain Paul Watson Foundation continues to work with legal counsel regarding the seizure of the Bandero, the treatment and detention of the crew, and the ongoing investigation.Our immediate priority is clear: we want our ship back.“Operation 86 was stopped before our work was finished. This is not the end of Operation 86.”— Jonny Velasquez

        The majority of the crew may now be home, but the Bandero remains seized, one crew member remains detained, and our mission remains unfinished.We will continue. Please send the new follow up email just created to keep the pressure and also support our work with a donation if you can to finance the legal operations!

  • metermatic26@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I expected them to vote as much. Iceland is a tiny country that relies mainly on fishing. And it’s not like the smaller mainland European nations, who heavily rely on their larger neighbors for trade and defense.

    The vote also seems to have been prompted by fears of US aggression. Iceland is already in NATO so (on paper) it benefits from collective defense. Joining the EU might cement defense commitments by mainland countries, but Iceland will still need to invest heavily in national defense for that to realistically protect them from a belligerent America.