The linked article has a list of supporting banks as well - some adding support in the future (listed with future date)
The linked article has a list of supporting banks as well - some adding support in the future (listed with future date)
It’s mentioned earlier in the article. China promised/agreed 200$ bn, but never came close, and didn’t reach import levels from before the trade war.
I’m not much of a baker or Apfelstrudel eater.
Don’t ask what she did before moving to EU.
Is the 15% in both directions?
Warum also die Grenze in Euro festlegen?
Weil es drängt und das ein guter Anfang wäre.
Wie gibt man das relativ oder selbstanpassend an? Das Problem hat man doch bei vielen definierten Beträgen. Und die müssen dann immer wieder angepasst werden.
Why do they want to veto arms exports to within the EU?
GitHub is offering quite a lot for free to FOSS (and public repos in general).
I wonder how much cost they have for all the CI minutes they sponsor?
Das finde ich eine gute Idee.
In einer düsteren Atmosphäre, die an Beerdigungen in dem Kultfilm “Der Pate” von Francis Ford Coppola erinnerte
Ich finde diesen Vergleich ja sehr… seltsam und unpassend
Towels right next to it for when the CPUs are sweating too much
At least when it’s not exact numbers like here, it could be “10% is still millions”. But obviously, I doubt that’s their calculation. It usually is the nonsense “full” calc.
This is mainly an issue of the terms damage and loss being overloaded with different meanings.
If the act of unlicensed access comes at no distribution or access cost to the creator and publisher, then it’s a different kind of damage than if you damage or steal physical property. Stealing from the official distribution channel may incur cost.
All of these are unrelated to production cost and right to [controlled] distribution.
When a car is stolen from a car dealership, their property is lost. They can no longer sell it. Digital content however, is copyable and distributable at marginal cost, whether it is accessed in other instances without a license or not.
This discrepancy is what leads to these very different views and comments of damage not being real damage. They have not “lost” anything after all. They still own the product and the rights. You can argue about forms of loss, but it’s undeniable that they still have these.
The article doesn’t talk about any specific kind of war, does it?
For example, if I look at Gaza or Ukraine, I can’t see it as “damage to rich private property rights”.
Does that include your country being invaded? Does “a pointless war driven by maniac idiots” include defense from invasion?
Einfach mal Faktor 1000 niedriger als ne Milliarde.
Ich verstehe nicht?
Ich meine es gab bis vor kurzem noch Regulierung zu Größen oder Mengen. Und nachdem die nicht mehr normiert gruppiert sind kommt so ein 10 Gramm Geschiss bei raus.
Relevanter halte ich es als Verhandlungstaktik. Unsicherheit sähen, Druck ausüben, Drohen. Dann wird der Verhandlungspartner sicherlich mehr zugestehen.
Even when you know better, throwing it away may be the best decision.
Ah, yes, so they sent two police officers on regular duty, right? Right?
What the…