• orlando [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9時間前

    Am I the only one who gets the sense that star trek was kind of meant to be about socialism but then they gave up and it became a kind of NATO thing? There are a lot of DS9 fans that admin .world… the borg.

  • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    11時間前

    One episode = one story

    Two connected episodes = epic story

    Three connected episodes = Major season plot event

    I hate how they try to force ten episodes to tell one story, especially as they lack the talent to make a complex story. Consider the very first season of Game of thrones, just how packed that one season was with events and plotlines.

    Take Picard season 1; back in TNG that could’ve been done in 2-3 episodes.

    • FourteenEyes [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10時間前

      Better yet they could have just not made it at all because holy shit was Picard a horrible clusterfuck of a show

      idk who that old English guy Patrick Stewart portrayed was supposed to be but it was not fucking Jean Luc Picard

      • Nacarbac [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4時間前

        It’s baffling but Patrick Stewart seems to have either never understood, or really resented, the character and show. Every time he got creative control it resulted in shallow action slop.

      • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10時間前

        Admittedly I have a soft spot for the lovecraftian horror of season 1, even if they didn’t do too much with it (another thing that bothers me; I really wanted to enjoy what they’d been building up to)

        It is hard to sit through though; I want to finish season 2 but I just can’t

      • Kefla [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5時間前

        This is the thing that really bugs me. There’s never any time for characters to rest, recover, for plot points to breathe, for characters to reflect on things that have happened and change their views or strategies as the situation develops. “Character development” is exclusively limited to massive individual traumatic events

    • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      11時間前

      Hard agree. We need to go back to weekly low budget slop. I don’t need a 9 episode cinematic drama that ends on a cliffhanger that will never be resolved. I need a thing I can sit down and reliably enjoy week after week after week. I want hundreds of episodes of incomprehensible lore and characters that develop in wacky ways as the writers try to keep it interesting. Basically I’m saying every TV show should become One Piece

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10時間前

        We need to go back to weekly low budget slop

        star trek used to higher unknown actors; now they literally have to pay through the nose for the likes of known names anson mount, paul giamatti, and holly hunter.

    • Inui [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11時間前

      I’m okay with shorter seasons but not when they commonly have like 2 years before the next season releases. By that time, I’ve forgotten everything that happened or stopped caring altogether. They have no confidence in their products so they don’t even start production until they see if the first few episodes do ironman numbers.

  • Random question but how would y’all say Stargate is? We’re watching Babylon 5 r/n and it kinda sucks because at best it’s anti fascist liberalism, but at least there’s still that. Is Stargate better or worse politically

  • Gorillatactics [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10時間前

    But how many dramas with 20+ episodes per season actually hold up? I only ever see people discussing Trek, Lost, ER, and the West Wing.

    Also I dont think trek was comparatively low budget for its time.

    I think people are nostalgic for 2000s tv which was a result of the new frontier of cable. New channels had to make a niche for themselves to stand out from all the competing channels and so funded all types of stuff in the hopes of finding an audience. The streaming era that followed it and the network tv that preceded were near monopolies appealing to the lowest common denominator.

    • Robert_Kennedy_Jr [xe/xem, xey/xem]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10時間前

      They spent about half of what current Trek episodes do adjusted for inflation. TNG also had a lot of episodes where it’s just people on set and there wasn’t much in the way of special effects to worry about.

      Off the top of my head Xena, Stargate SG-1 and Battlestar Galactica all hold up pretty well.

    • Dessa [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9時間前

      A lot of shows, including some of the ones you mentioned, have a lot of one-shot episodes and just a few that make big plot changes (ER and Trek fit this model), and I think that holds true going back for a while. You didn’t ask for sitcoms per se, but some sitcoms did this, like Frasier, Friends, Scrubs, and the later episodes of Cheers. Firefly was an example of a failed show that maintained a long following, and a few network shows like Alias, Smallville, X-Files, and House had developing plots too. YMMV on whether these shows “hold up.”

      But in general it’s not going to have happened a lot under the old model because shows could be dropped even just a few episodes in, but if successful, were expected to run for an indefinite length, and layering heavy into episode-by-episode plot progression risked losing viewers who missed an episode. Big event episodes would have marketing and often get priority for rerun schedules so you knew to prioritize your shows if you were a diehard.

      These days, shows are signed on for full seasons from the get-go and are usually wrapped by the time the show publishes, so it’s easier for producers and writers to work around. But the real reason 10 episode runs and 2 season shows feature so heavy is because those have lower contractual obligations than anything greater. Yes, it’s about budget, but the cost jumps dramatically the moment they go past these constraints, so they generally won’t unless they’re shooting for a prestige show to nab some Emmys in which case the budgets are already huge

      • Gorillatactics [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7時間前

        Yes I specified Dramas because Comedies do better with longer seasons. Comedy is all about rythm and it takes a while to find it. Early episodes of sitcoms always pair up random characters to see who has the best chemistry, thats on the job training streaming shows cant do.

        Ironically I think firefly stayed popular because its cancellation, it exists in just the right way for fanfics to go wild over. And the actors can charge money for a picture and an autograph for years after a part time gig.

    • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10時間前

      Xena, Stargate sg-1 and atlantis but not the third one, Babylon 5, Farscape, X-files, twin peaks (22 episode season 2), that justice league cartoon where it’s all 2-part half hour episodes and they were broadcast in an hour block originally?

      and trek is 80s tv, kind of.

  • Omegamint [comrade/them, doe/deer]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8時間前

    Hard disagree. TV is far better now than it was back then. As much as I would love longer seasons, the 26 episode season approach usually meant a ton of drawn out storylines for anything other than the best episodic shows. I’m watching the newest season of Interview with the Vampire and it’s only 7 episodes long this time, but holy shit it’s so good!