was wondering if he was a dumbfuck or a liar when the nazi tattoo was discovered and yet somehow it seems he’s both
I’m scared of becoming a public figure because of some dumb drunk Facebook posts I made 15 years ago. I don’t get how these guys who have more skeletons in the closet than Pol Pot keep thinking it’s a good idea to go into the lime light.
So blessed I didn’t use social media as a child. Granted I could still never do establishment politics bc of this website but wtv.
Wouldn’t it be funny if it turned out Mamdani had an account here but he mostly just posted beanis jokes to Badposting.
looking forward to a headline about Mamdani’s former boss Dave
I made some Usenet posts that either will make me a darling of the left and prove I am The Real Deal, or get me executed in trumps third term not sure which.
Ryan Grim: Sounds like a candidate to fuck my credibility for!
I mean you gotta admit it doesn’t sound disqualifying when you look at the other people Americans vote for
Isn’t this how US electoral system works? Person with the majority of credible SA allegations wins?
I wouldn’t be surprised
Op is skeptical becauseremoveds and nazi tattoos are classic lib shit.
nazism and zionism are the two poles of the american political establishment
Hold on I have a great image.

I wonder what percentage of congressmen are rapist
Well, there have been studies that have shown that a little more than 25% of college aged men had committed sexual assault. So I’m guessing at least one in four, probably a little higher considering how crazy and criminally inclined most of them are.
I would like to see where you’re getting this number
(Koss et al., 1987; Koss, Heise, & Russo, 1994). In college and community samples, rates of self-reported rape perpetration range from 6% to 15%, and rates of sexual assault perpetration range from 22% to 57% (Abbey et al., 1998; Calhoun, Bernat, Clum, & Frame, 1997; Koss et al., 1987; Muehlenhard & Linton, 1987; Rapaport & Burkhart, 1984; Senn, Desmarais, Verberg, & Wood, 2000).
Calhoun et al. [1997] surveyed 65 young men in a rural community in Georgia who had recently participated in a study of school-aged youth. The average age of participants was 19 and most were Caucasian. Twenty-two percent of these men (n = 14) had perpetrated some type of sexual assault based on their answers to a modified version of the SES; 6.4% had committed an act that met standard legal definitions of completed rape
Senn et al. [2000] surveyed a representative sample of 195 men in a small Canadian city. Participants ranged in age from 19 to 82 and most were Caucasian. Using a modified version of the SES, 27% of participants reported committing some type of sexual assault; 7.7% reported committing attempted or completed rape. M
One large noncollege study was conducted with a special population. Merrill et al. [2001] surveyed 7,850 male US navy recruits from three different locations. These men were on average 20 years of age and approximately two-thirds were Caucasian. Using a shortened form of the SES, approximately 11% of these men reported that they had committed an act that met standard legal definitions of rape.
So yeah, there’s quite a few different studies…all of them paint a pretty dark picture. They are self reported, so the number could potentially be even higher.
Maybe this; I quote (I’m assuming I don’t need to CW given the whole thread is but I’ll edit if I’m wrong):
Computer-assisted self-interviews were completed with a random sample of 163 unmarried Caucasian and African American men in a large metropolitan area. Almost a quarter (24.5%) of these men acknowledged committing an act since the age of 14 that met standard legal definitions of attempted or completedremoved; an additional 39% had committed another type of sexual assault involving forced sexual contact or verbal coercion
Then again it might be this (depressing I found two candidate studies immediately with a single shitty search):
In college and community samples, rates of self-reportedremoved perpetration range from 6% to 15%, and rates of sexual assault perpetration range from 22% to 57%
I didn’t look at either in depth / their methodology; but I wouldn’t be surprised. I am a man and I can count on the fingers of a single hand the amount of men I’ve known in my life that didn’t feel comfortable saying objectifying stuff about women when there were none around.

. I am a man and I can count on the fingers of a single hand the amount of men I’ve known in my life that didn’t feel comfortable saying objectifying stuff about women when there were none around
So true and honestly why i never found myself on the #notallmen train because it felt like it was all men but me
Thanks for the source
One of the reasons I plan to stay the fuck away from men.
Definitely a good idea, sadly
Jfc is the number really that high?
Unfortunately it may very well be higher.
oh it’s almost certainly much higher

Are you deadass?
Yeah… Definitely not a good thing. I’m a pretty masc dude who’s always gotten along better with women. I played football in school and the way those guys talked about women made me quit teamed sports.
My best friend from highschool was the only dude I ever really got close too and they ended up transitioning about 5 years ago, we are still besties.
In the last 5 years?
Don’t forget being a mercenary who loves war and killing
Thats a weird one because he cant even fall back on being poor and that was the only way out (his parents are rich af and he went to a private boarding school as a kid)
Its one thing to be Butler style figure, you entered it apolitically or desperately or were drafted otherwise forced - and then figured out it was evil inside. But it sounds like he knew it ahead of time and still dreamed about being a lil soldier boy regardless
Concentration camp guard too, at Abu Grhabi.
Liberals really went for it, 99% Hitler.
Look, can’t a guy just follow orders once in a while?
This article (“threads”) from yesterday introduces another character to the developing situation
https://hexbear.net/post/8970221
Daniel Moraff is the political consultant who “discovered” and pushed Platner hard to the forefront. Which begs the question, HIM? Why…?
It could well be that they vetted him, and found out about all his past, and let him run to discredit progressive candidates as a whole.
The democrats are paid losers so tbh this being intentional rather than a fuck up tracks
Lib unless xcancel link
I stole the screenshot from discord and have never used twitter in my life 😔
Then how do you know it’s authentic
Does a silly quip need to be? If this was conveying important information I would have checked
Don’t forget to get someone in rhe media to be ride or die for you like Ryan Grim
NOTE: Politico’s response to Breaking Points and Drop Site News on the gaps in reporting follows: “This story is based on extensive reporting and interviews and reflects our editorial standards. In interviews with us and in accounts she gave to other outlets, Jenny Racicot said that she told Graham Platner not to come to her home and that he nevertheless showed up there uninvited. POLITICO gave Platner and his campaign ample opportunity to respond to our reporting and to provide any information or documentation they believed contradicted it. If presented with information that materially challenges our reporting, we will report it.”
Ryan and Saagar discuss exclusive reporting on key details missing from the Graham Platner story.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=j8MStTYqt-M

They’re not wrong that they wanna do the equivalent of a coup and run Mills regardless but the Platner campaign and the people who pushed him definitely didnt do themselves or progressive nominal left by picking this fucking guy - and backing him after the nazi tattoo thing and the earlier abuse story
did you watch the video? grimm and sagaar call him a loathsome dog.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
lol but please mark it for SA
Done, my fault 👍
ty and no worries














