• TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    44 minutes ago

    These are the prices I paid for the 24TB model from that same product line over the past two years:

    2024-11-01: $359.99

    2024-12-25: $449.99

    2025-06-28: $279.99 oatchi-pog

    2026-06-09: $569.99

    2026-07-06: $599.99 boohoo


    I use ZFS, btw.

  • Syndication@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If every consumer would simply boycott RAM, SSDs, HDDs, CPUs & GPUs… We’d still be in the same boat because companies are the ones buying all this shit. We are so fucked.

    • We are so fucked

      Except for china! because with sufficient state resources and constant demand they can and will increase production eventually!

      meanwhile the west will simply cut health and social services and then spend twice what they “save” on subsidies, tax breaks and unspecified payouts to “chip companies” with no specific requirements on them actually ever doing anything. Capitalist efficiency, baby!

    • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      *the companies that consumers watch to get their ads from to buy goods from, or where do you think facebook/google money comes from?

  • RondoRevolution [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Storage prices are going bonkers, a few days ago a friend asked me for a good NVMe for his PC and the prices here in Brasil easily tripled, a 1TB NVMe is costing around R$900-1100 reais which today is ~$174-213 dollars, this shit is extremely expensive right now here.

    • darkcalling [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      There’s limited global manufacturing capacity. AI companies have been buying up all they can get to store their datasets on. They’re not fast enough for the models to run off but they still need them to store the training data which is in the thousands of petabytes.

    • Carrot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Actually $700 for a 20+ TB drive is insane, even new. I use 24TB drives in my media server, and I was able to buy them for $480 this time last year. I’m crossing my fingers that I won’t have to buy more until the price goes back down.

    • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      ssd cost roughly the same as cheapo hdd of same low volume (1-2tb), it’s kinda funny

      (probably signifies that problem is very weird, 9 plates hdd uses proportionally more reading heads and plates, so wtf is that price scaling (not actuators, not magnetic heads, not plates) i cannot tell, they use minuscule amount of ram, pcb is trivial itself, maybe the spinning drive? but that would be hilarious)

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Server parts deals has a pretty good reputation in the data hoarder community. I’ve got 3 of their drives and at work we have 6. Knock on wood, but we’ve had no problems with these drives over the past couple of years. One was DOA but they replaced it quickly. And better DOA than after it’s in the array for a month.

          Also these are enterprise drives so outside of being DOA I have pretty high faith in their reliability.

        • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          manufacturer recertified afaik is two categories. one can basically be returned droves that were never used because some company bought them in bulk and never used it. or returns of drives that are broken new in box, and then fixed, then usually new white labeled. recertified usually consists of drives that were overall, rarely/never used outside of testing for functionality.

          refurbished usually is lower standard and usually used drives backed with some warranty.

          if its seller refurbished or recert, thats basically useless info imo. cant trust that over the oem.

    • Hey chat you think this might have something to do with anything?

      (Clarifying questions indicated guided munitions use RAM that’s on a totally different supply chain but i find it funny to think of the u.s. having RAM shortages because they literally blew it all up for no reason)

      • buckykat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I would expect “modern” guided munitions to use an absolutely tiny amount of ram by modern standards, because military hardware is often way behind consumer stuff in terms of raw computer specs. The US also makes like ten of those a year vs the absolute torrent of “ai” datacenters

        • Yeah the lying machine said basically it’s different ram, made by different facilities (i.e. not in Taiwan), and it’s also older and shittier for various reasons (extremely advanced chips having circuits/transistors or whatever that are so small being more vulnerable to EM interference so they use huge 20nm+ ones, and there being specific protocols on developing shit for defense technology just delaying new development)

          I just think it’s funny to think there’s no RAM because the U.S. literally blows it up

          • buckykat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Pretty much, and also there are really long planning cycles so what seemed cutting edge (at least by the standards of hardened, approved special hardware) at the start of the development is even more obsolete by the time anything actually gets built and delivered.

            The equally reductive but actually true explanation is that there’s no RAM because the US literally glues it all to pieces of trash (specialized AI GPUs without display outputs)

    • RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 hours ago

      A coworker of mine bought 5 18tb recertified hard drives maybe a year and a half ago, and he spent about $500 on them, those same drives from the same vendor would host him somewhere in the ballpark of $6000 now.

      • chgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        It’s pretty awkward because you need to buy pretty big/expensive hard drives for it to actually make more sense to get 5 of them than just buying two bigger hard drives and mirroring them.

        It’s easily the most expensive thing I own and it’s crumbling.

        At least DDR4 ECC RAM is not too bad (relatively).

    • Majestic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Assuming you mean hard drives not SSDs: almost nothing. If prices scaled perfectly linearly and all things were equal at these prices per TB it would be worth about $6.

      But all things are not equal. Your drives are assuredly much older than these drives, probably more worn and the power cost of running it compared to capacity and use of limited SATA connectors would not be worth it for any kind of hot storage which lowers its value. The only way to sell them would be in a lot of at least 8, ideally more and you’d probably be lucky to get $3/drive if you can prove the SMART data on all of them is good and they work. Also if they’re not enterprise drives like these are knock that down a bit more.

      Buying drives that small and old is little better than gambling and playing the odds so you have to buy an awful lot of them awfully cheap to deal with the fact you’re assuredly getting some bad eggs. You also have to figure in the hassle for the buyer of managing say backing up their 10TB data-set to 40 drives like this including plugging them in, unplugging, regular testing every year and storing them somewhere safe as well as dealing with failures and documenting what is on each drive. Most people conclude it isn’t worth the hassle though there’s enough desperate people out there now that some might bite.

      250GB SSDs on the other hand assuming they’re not in a failing state are still worth some change as you can use them to install an OS on various homelab devices like a server, firewall, etc.