It’s not for good reason that managing sync conflicts is one of the hardest things :).
I don’t know your exact use, but if you don’t already have a device that’s always online you could look into that to have it sync as often as possible.
I’ve also had conflicts for files generated by my notes program that change often. Those had no use though so adding them to the ignore list helped there.
Should be fine if packaged well. Every hard drive I received up to now would’ve been fine to play football with, it was packaged that well.
As with any new drive (especially if you buy refurbished) you should run badblocks on it. Depending on the size this could take days, but it’s a good testament to the state of the drive.
A friend of mine travelled to China, to talk about politics with locals they used his phone because they were afraid of their govt listening in. So yeah maybe the EU/US ain’t so bad.
Depends, the EU seems to actually have a decently prepared system, using zero knowledge proofs. If it’s that, my privacy would not be harmed, but would still prove I’m allowed to view the page.
As for the situation where every site needs a photo ID, I might just go live in a cabin in the woods or something
Edit because I’m being downvoted: I do not support the idea of locking down parts of the internet behind any kind of identification. The question is “what would you do if it happened” not “how would you like to see it implemented”.
There’s extensions that get rid (/autoclick) of those banners. Eg “I (still) don’t care about cookies”
Problem is that good sites, which do not do all the garbage listed above, do not get rewarded for that when being consumed through AI. And in that case you should in fact feel bad
Technically even the standard system is also AI (and it totally would’ve been advertised as such too before the LLM-boom).
Functional programming fixes the problem by simply not making it OO anymore, and while I’m personally a big fan of the paradigm there are situations where an OO approach is preferable (or even only to conform to a project’s existing way of doing things).
Not like C# is all that much better. So much garbage in the fundamentals just because it was done that way at the start and “they can’t change it now”. The best example is the IList interface.
Theoretically this interface exposes both index-based access and collection-like modifications and as such would be perfect in a function if you need those two features on a type. In reality you can’t use it as a function parameter because half the official types implementing IList aren’t modifiable and throw a runtime error. E.g Arrays
There’s an extension for better discord that does pretty this.
Let’s agree it’s all just propaganda. For both sides.
Having data dependent on each other in a type means that either you have redundant data (so one of the fields should be computed) or that your container tries to be too generic (you should in this case prefer an ‘Apple’ class over a ‘Fruit’ class with an enum field ‘Type’)
I mean, not quite. There should be a split between backend (logic) and frontend (presentation) even for desktop applications. It’s not mandatory, but simply much better design. The ‘interface’ with which your frontend code calls the backend is much like an API (as in an API is also an interface)
Even with meat-based venues it depends. I went to a 1-star steak restaurant and we asked what they would do if someone asked for a vegan menu. They absolutely do accommodate it as long as they know in advance.
Though to be fair it’s a bit different than your average steakhouse
Well a tracker I’m following is up more than 10% over the last week so it pretty much was a dip… Now before he crashes the market the next time he tells his buddies and they’ll have made a nice profit buying this dip.
Kinda funny that that site just says the gTLD shouldn’t exist without any explanation why.
Upvote and comment on this shit. -if you’re outside the US, otherwise you should be out there instead of looking at videos of it.
Well you didn’t say for everyone… So maybe he meant just for himself :)
You are not exactly right, but going in the right direction. Not having a forwarded port means you aren’t ‘connectable’ by peers as your firewall will block incoming traffic. What this means is that only ‘connectable’ peers will be able to connect to you (your client can reach out to them as their port is forwarded). You are however invisible to peers that also aren’t ‘connectable’. You might also experience some degradation in time to connect as people can’t reach out to you.
To sum it up:
Probably because the 2FA spec recommends allowing the previous and next TOTP too. (both to account for this need to hurry and to account for time drift)