• Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    imagine the morale at the orc camps when oil refineries take priority over your life and your operations

  • rose56@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    24 hours ago

    They don’t like it now, do they? Fuck Moscow for real, life is not a game where you always win.

  • antonim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Nice to see Russia is starting to take care of and protect its population. Keep it up.

    Lol.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      only moscowvites and st petersbergs, his sole political base of power. everywhere else in russia is expendable.

  • greygore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    1 day ago

    Images shared online show the system with only two of the standard six launch missiles pictured on one side, suggesting there may be a shortage of interceptors.

    This feels significant for something buried at the end of the article.

    • manxu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah. The Ukrainians are masterfully playing the economics of it. Shooting down drones that cost a tenth of an interceptor is ineffective. It’s downright ruinous if Ukraine sends hundreds of drones a day. If the sky around Moscow is saturated with interceptions, there will be none left for the front lines, where they actually would make a military difference.

      The Iranians have been playing a similar game with Trump. So much so that, to nobody’s surprise, the leaders of the Gulf states invited Zelenskyy to offer drone interception tech instead of Hegseth.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        Don’t they have gun AA systems as well though? Wouldn’t they be more effective against drones or are the radars unsuitable for the small targets.

        Not sure if the Gepard required modifications or not to target drones, thought I had heard it could do a pretty good job at taking them out if it’s at range. Probably not so much if there is uneven terrain for the drones to move through.

          • jrs100000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Also spraying thousands of large caliber bullets a minute into the air isn’t a great idea in a populated area around the capital. They might hit somebody important.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I’m no military expert but my read on this is Russia has realized there’s no point in air defense in the front line anymore because they can’t possibly keep up anyway…

    • rain_enjoyer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Pantsir has also guns tho. More importantly than that it has a radar that can guide missile, which means that radar range exceeds gun range, which means that if there’s info sharing system in place, single pantsir can send message to a dude in dshk technical saying “drone incoming towards your position from xx direction”. But, this requires such system to exist, and it has to be fast enough, reliable enough and not to target airliners too often. Missiles are for higher end targets like jet drones or actual cruise missiles

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s a fair point, but given that Moscow could presumably also be targeted by these higher end weapons, one would think that if the missiles were available, that the air defense systems would be fully loaded.

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I wonder what the success rate of the Pantsir system is against drones. Moscow has a ton of them installed yet Ukraine has been successful in getting past them repeatedly with a relatively few reported drones.

        I have also never seen an video with their auto-cannons active. I wonder how much time it takes from them to swap from missile to the auto-cannon.

        • rain_enjoyer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          i think it would be more proper to look at success rate of entire system as a whole, and also keep in mind that there might be 90% success rate and still some slip through just because how huge these waves are. next day after that there was another drone wave and no reported footage

  • caboose2006@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I’m sensing a big offensive operation coming from the Ukrainians. Amphibious landing in Crimea anyone?

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Eh they likely don’t need to. Just retake other land and let them go thirsty in Crimea for now.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        They don’t need to but it would be huge. If Ukraine could pull off Crimean capture Russia would have no choice but to capitulate. Putin would likely die the same week.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lmao

    Russia actually primed to lose this entire war.

    Do we expect any territory boundaries to be redrawn eastwards soon?

    • LordMayor@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I don’t think there’s any way Ukraine would take Russian territory if that’s what you mean.

      That would mean constant war with no end. Ukraine would gain nothing by trying to control hostile territory. And, they’d lose support from the West for any kind of invasion. Europe would be happy with just a strong Ukraine and Poland buffer.

      Ukraine taking parts of Russia is pure revenge fantasy. It makes no logical sense

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        AFAIK Ukraine already occupies a small amount of Russian territory on the northern side, but they also lost a lot more on the south.

        The west idolizes what the greatest generation did to the nazis, or another way to put it “turnabout is fair play”.

        • The_v@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Ukraine is working on completely cutting off the southern front from supply routes. Eventually the troops along the southern front are going to suffer from lack of supplies. Without food, ammo etc, they will be have to retreat back or be easily overrun in their weakened state. Crimea is being cut off so that if the Russian troops retreat, they head east not south.

          It’s not going to happen immediately, but if Ukraine keeps up the current pressure by this fall might be very interesting.

    • zabadoh@ani.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 day ago

      Keeping Putin safe is the only thing that matters.

      Send people to the front line to be killed. No big deal.

      Destroy the economy. So what?

      None of that matters as long as Putin feels safe.