This effectively means no new fossil fuel equipment within a few years

  • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Doesn’t really work like that. You can’t put more than a bit of hydrogen into existing appliances or pipes without destroying them

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Yes, with a tiny amount of hydrogen. Exceed 25% and appliances explode and pipes corrode in new ways causing leaks. It will ultimately be a lot cheaper to electrify everything than to switch to hydrogen

        The leakage of hydrogen in widespread use (eg: not just the chemicals Industry) means a set of reactions in the atmosphere which cause a bunch of warming as well.

        • Aniki@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          do you have sources on hydrogen pipelines not being possible? because they are actively being built in germany right now. i doubt that somebody builds a billion-dollar pipeline for nothing.

          • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            They’re very possible, but existing pipes used for natural gas aren’t suitable, and replacing them is more expensive than electrification.

            • Aniki@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              51 minutes ago

              interesting. i remember reading that hydrogen transport through hydrogen pipes costs about half of what it costs to transport the same amount of power over the same distance through electric cables. iirc the figures are: 0.6 - 1 ct/kWh for cables, 0.3 ct/kWh for hydrogen (per 100 km or 1000 km, not sure anymore). could be that i’m mixing that up though and that the number is actually only for methane gas.

              • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                32 minutes ago

                We’re talking household distribution here, not long-distance transport. The economics are very different when you’re talking about having to open up walls and dig new holes in foundations to put in pipes.

                HVDC probably comes in cheaper for long-distance transmission at this point.