nice little blogpost where someone reviews music players

  • scttgard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 小时前

    I have been using JRiver Media Center for over 20 years, started on Windows and they have a perfect Linux and Mac versions. More options and features than I would ever use. It just works, best player I have ever used.

    jriver.com

    • glibg@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 小时前

      This looks interesting, I will give it a try one of these days.

      My gold standard for audio players is MusicBee because I LOVE the album art view, where if you click on an album it “folds open” the songs without taking you away from the album art view. I couldn’t find a Linux player with a comparable feature, and I tried a bunch of them. I wish I wasn’t so particular about my music player but it seems everyone is, hence the many different software.

  • RedSnt 🧩♂️👓🖥️@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 小时前
    I'm glad Fooyin got an honorary mention, because that's all I need:

    Update: After reading through many comments, a lot of people mentioned their affinity for foobar2000-style players, and fooyin came up as the most frequent suggestion. I haven’t tested it, but it seems to be very popular. If you want even more options, fooyin comes highly recommended by a lot of people.

    • djdarren@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 小时前

      Heh, clicked on that and saw my post at the top. That threw me for a second.

      As an update, I’ve since worked out how to get Navidrome working over Tailscale and an Nginx redirect from my VPS, so I now have Feishin installed on several computers, all drawing from the same Navidrome server at home.

      It’s pretty cool.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 天前

      has it been updated since? i always enjoy talking music players

      edit: hey! found my old comment! also some folk i think are my dorks from my old college days maybe i hope? if they’re using the same usernames that’d be wild and fun. i wonder if i should break out my old cult username.

  • enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 小时前

    I’m still on Rhythmbox but at this point it’s a hassle to use something else because the metadata (album name, track id, etc) would break. I used to test Amberol, Lollypop, GNOME music 3 years ago and the metadata requires fixing.

    I also kind of care with the vanity number like play counts that is already recorded.

    • traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 小时前

      Mood. Love what subsonic has let me do with my music collection. Navidrome, Arpeggi, and music assistant.

    • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 小时前

      Agreed. It is my player of choice, though being it is pure Python, it uses a lot of resources for a music player. If I was tight on ram or using a slower CPU, I’d probably go with something leaner.

      • flameleaf@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 小时前

        What a strange take. When I first switched to Linux in ~2009 I tried a ton of other players. Weirdly, Quod Libet was the only performant option back then. Amarok, Rhythmbox, Banshee, Clementine, etc all chugged to load my library with their UIs freezing for upwards of half an hour before I had something usable. Quod Libet just worked.

        Right now it’s using 598MB with a music library of ~31K songs.

    • jcarax@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 天前

      I absolutely adore being able to click into and between genres and artists to get to albums and songs instantly. I want to ultimately move back to MPD, maybe Navidrome or Subsonic, but… I just love Quod Libet.

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 天前

      i’ve always been a “organize everything at the file system level, and just play folders on demand in winamp” type guy… so when i couldn’t find a good winamp replacement after switching to linux, i ended up on quod libet and got used to organizing everything via tagging

      quod libet was a bit overwhelming at first and forced me to fix a lot of broken tags, but totally worth it.

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 天前

    I like being exposed to new applications, but Elisa should’ve come up in the author’s search as kdePackages.elisa. Especially if you’re using KDE (where the Qt UI blends in well), it plainly meets all four of the criteria for inclusion. It’s such a major oversight given its popularity.

  • snoons@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 天前

    I’ve been using Audacious for years now; it’s lightweight and also has no library management but I find I don’t really need that. I just point it to any one album on my drive and it plays it.

    I have each album saved as a separate ‘playlist’ which works well for me. I can see people being annoyed with how I have it set up, but I like it this way.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 小时前

      it’s lightweight and also has no library management

      That’s the point for me for Audacious. I don’t want to dig through my entire 30+ GB music folder, create a massive index or whatever, load all that shit to memory every time I open the fucking program, just to play one album.

      “Oh I want this album”> Drag it in
      “Oh I want this discography” > drag it in

      The only problem is no multi column tab view, and no drag into empty space/designated zone to create a new playlist.

    • qwank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 天前

      Audacious is the only one I’ve tried and works perfect for me. Load up my whole library and shuffle!

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 天前

      Audacious isn’t perfect, but it’s far better than the others that I tried. Had been using VLC forever in WIndows, but for whatever reason I kept running into issues that I couldn’t resolve, so began a search for alternatives.

      The only huge issue I have is when I add more songs to my music directory, I can’t refresh the existing playlist. I have to delete and add the directory again. Don’t do it a lot, so it’s more inconvenience, and everything else works so much better than other alternatives did.