Assembly Bill No. 1043 was approved by California governor Gavin Newsom in October of last year, and becomes active on January 1, 2027 (via The Lunduke Journal). The bill states, among other factors, that “An operating system provider shall do all of the following:”

"(1) Provide an accessible interface at account setup that requires an account holder to indicate the birth date, age, or both, of the user of that device for the purpose of providing a signal regarding the user’s age bracket to applications available in a covered application store.

“(2) Provide a developer who has requested a signal with respect to a particular user with a digital signal via a reasonably consistent real-time application programming interface that identifies, at a minimum, which of the following categories pertains to the user.”

xi-plz

  • OrionsMask [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    What the fuck is up with the ruling class’s push on age verification on everything the past year? Does anyone actually know what the deal is?

    My brain goes to the theory that they want to create undodgable ways to surveil everyone after the Luigi incident so everyone’s ID (and photo) is on record, making them easier to track - I trust these people not storing identifiable information as much as I trust my phone to not be recording 24/7. The fact that Palantir has started to spread like mold in every industry with sizable information databases too.

    • abc [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      2 days ago

      you joke but i bet if you polled every IT Guy in California they’d probably overwhelmingly recommend every household appliance should require 2FA and will drive out to the drone-strike trailer to target you if, as a homeowner, use your Feitan for your toaster 2FA instead of creating a ticket to request a yubikey from the government like you’re supposed to

  • hello_hello [undecided, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Pcgamer citing lunduke is cringe, literally the worst person you know and not an expert on anything.

    This law is so unenforceable you could just call it anarcho capitalism. I can’t wait for Californian liberals to enter the “Is it GNU, is it Linux or GNU/Linux/systemd/gnome|kde/Firefox” flamewars.

      • darkcalling [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        LTSC is still an operating system with network connectivity. IF they were back-porting it to Windows 10 they’d include it there as well most likely because these laws don’t tend to provide intelligent exemptions like for server OSes or embedded stuff.

        In California’s case I can forgive them for now IF they don’t amend it and make it worse (big IF) as I suspect this will be a stepping stone to saying “now that you have this basic thing, implement a workflow to check an ID at set-up as well”. As it stands at PRESENT it’s just parental controls where a parent can set their kid’s age as young and restrict them from inappropriate stuff which isn’t a bad goal necessarily (though fraught with actual problems in a reactionary society like ours).

        If I were writing these laws at a minimum I’d exclude OSes that lack a GUI as well as those that have a GUI but lack an ability for unrestricted internet access as well as those that reasonably are not used by consumers such as those intended to be installed on server hardware and which are not sold generally to average end users.

        More than likely other states pass this but require an ID or something and companies like Microslop, Google, Apple say fuck it and though initially restricting such requirements to those states announce a nationwide rollout because trying to comply with various laws is hard so might as well just comply with the strictest version floating around more than one state.

        So I doubt we’ll be worrying about this for long. They’ll be outlawing Linux in practice before the decade is up except for certified CIA run editions with closed source ID checking modules from Palantir or whatever. Which means hardware vendors will likely lock out those versions or at least not make hardware compatible with them or offer drivers. Valve can pull off maintaining their own flavored fork that complies but it’ll only run on certified hardware, everyone else will use a version of Microslop Linux which is just Linux by Microslop with their AI and lots of proprietary code compiled on top of it. But all the other editions will become hard pressed to be run on anything your average consumer can buy. Dark times ahead.

        But you should not use Windows.

        I’ll use what I need to in order to run what I need to run. For now I must maintain Windows machines. LTSC? Why yes I do. Thanks for your concern.

  • JakenVeina@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    On its face, this seems actually fine. All it’s REALLY mandating is that apps have a way to ask if the user is an adult or not. The burden of trust is placed on whoever sets up the OS, I.E. the parent, which is EXACTLY where it should be. No burden is placed on adults setting up usage for themselves. It’s not even much of a privacy concern, given that setup doesn’t require specifying age, but a general age bracket.

    We’ll have to see how this ends up getting implemented.

    • dontmindmehere307@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      isn’t it essentially bait for a harsher law then? any proposed implementation will immediately instigate a thousand bored devs to find ways to bypass, then they can go “look how easy it is to bypass”, and justify whatever?

      • JakenVeina@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It’s not a ridiculous point, but like… our governments need NO excuse to make harsh/strict/nonsense laws. If that’s what they wanted, they would have simply done it.

  • All Ice In Chains@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can’t wait for California Tech bros to cry when they tank their state’s econony.

    I need to find that picture of the tech bros looking like apes crying about their NFT’s or whatever that silly fad was.