You must log in or # to comment.
He should be finished after this interview.
The culturally normal thing is that my family, friends, colleagues and strangers all treat me like the woman I am and no one is losing their mind when I use the women’s toilet.
Isn’t this the same dude who was trying to start doing podcasts with alt right shitheads last year? This kind of nonsense is on brand for him at this point.
turning a big dial taht says “Transphobia” on it and constantly looking back at the audience for approval like a contestant on the price is right
The audience loudly boos no matter how far up I turn the transphobia dial.
Uh oh, have you tried turning it up to 11 yet?
I even built a new transphobia machine and they’re still mad!
This calls for swift action, let’s try turning the homophobia dial up.
Somebody here said something like, “Can’t wait for libs to tell me I’m responsible for a Vance presidency because I refuse to vote for this ghoul.” I think about that every time he opens his mouth. Can’t wait for all the milquetoast liberal pushback against Newsom’s despicable rhetoric to melt away into “Blue no matter who” the minute he is coronated by the plutocracy.
I have an inkling of hope that we won’t see a repeat of that narrative, especially if we’re dealing with poocum newsom. Chuck and Jeffies have really dropped the ball in terms of being an effective controlled opposition IMO the average lib has finally lost faith in democrats.
We’ll still see all those libs go “welp I guess I gotta vote for this guy” because they can’t fathom a nonbinary decision but I think the vitriol towards those who can’t stand the dem candidate will be much lower than it was for Kamala (blue sky not included)
they can’t fathom a nonbinary decision
More than two parties. More than two genders.They seemingly haven’t though. At least judging by the people I’ve talked to, in person, and online, people seem about as deluded as ever, trusting the suits on tv blaming everyone else for their losses in 2024.
It three presidential elections with the worst possible choices as candidates in a row as the “safe” choice didn’t win them over, it will take something else to bring them around.
It will take a barnstorming campaign, with populist rhetoric and the energy that goes with that, by an aggressive forceful candidate backed by organized groups and a slate of candidates up and down the line. And the odds of getting that are near zero it seems. Even without thinking of assassinations, that we would have to think about if it got popular, but at first we could do the barnstorming in person, at some point would need remote speeches, and our own security. Turn down secret service protection if you get the nomination, or relegate them away from the candidate to use as shields.
some small part of me hopes that he beats out kamala to further disenchant liberals who keep getting fooled by the democrat’s cloak of social progressivism-in-name-only.
Chuck and Jeffies have really dropped the ball in terms of being an effective controlled opposition IMO the average lib has finally lost faith in democrats.
This could have been said about lib leadership at various points in the 2010’s and 2000’s as well
More focused on tabletop issues, things that really matter — the stacking of stress in terms of the electricity bills and childcare costs and health care and obviously housing costs.”
Lmao they can’t and won’t even do that. They’re just pivoting from being the republican lite party to the republican party 2 the spectre of Reagan Rises
This is the classic
“Let’s talk about issues that really matter, like housing prices.”
“What are you gonna do about housing prices?”
“Fuck off.”
I thought Kamala was Reagan 2, what with the whole liz Cheney thing. This seems more like a pre-sequel kinda thing. Alt-universe Reagan. Just like my Marvel “what if” slop
it’s been 13 terms of ronald reagan or whatever i’m not counting.
Let’s see:
- Truman (MIC Reagan)
- Eisenhower (Cold warrior Reagan)
- Kennedy (Himbo Reagan)
- Johnson (Nancy Reagan)
- Nixon (Not Reagan, too aware. Maybe police state Reagan?)
- Ford (Pardoning your boys Reagan/Brewski Reagan)
- Carter (Religion Reagan)
- Reagan (By your powers combined I am Presidentman)
- Bush (Not Reagan, the ghoul behind)
- Clinton (Politely Racist Reagan)
- Dubya (Texas Reagan)
- Obama (Black Reagan/Grown in a CIA vat Reagan)
- Trump (Less Sexy Reagan)
- Biden (In it for the love of the game Reagan)
- Trump (More Senile Reagan)
Did I get it right?
i was thinking to double count clinton, bush 2, and obama but that works too
Johnson (Nancy Reagan)
笑死我了
I don’t know what that means. But I meant it as in Johnson was a savvy political operator and once Kennedys head was gone, he was going full steam ahead. Likewise Nancy was basically running the presidency once Reagans head was gone.
it means “I’m dead from laughing”, I liked your entire comment it was hilarious
Awwww thank you!
“Tabletop issues instead of divisive identity politics” is the latest neoliberal shibboleth from Davos this year, in case you were wondering. I’ve heard that phrase come out the mouths of libs in the US, Canada, and the UK all in the last month.
And somehow the conformist sheep and their constant calls for the mass extermination of anyone who isn’t a straight white man ISN’T divisive identity politics?
I got a tabletop issue for them.
I’m ride or die for the Halfling IRA.
Man definitely using that one in my next campaign lol
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
culturally normal
gesticulates wildly
HAVE YOU SEEN WHAT PASSES FOR NORMAL IN THIS FUCK OF A SHIT?
Normal is when you’re ruled by a clan of pedophiles who face no repercussions for their crimes.
normal is when a politician personally confiscates everything from a destitute person while grinning for the cameras
Weren’t libs just a few days ago attacking leftists who said they wouldn’t vote for this fuck lmao
If genocide wasn’t their red line, transphobia certainly wouldn’t be.
Newsom has done worse. If they can support him stealing from the homeless, they won’t change from this
For every do gooder they lose in the city, they will pick up two nazis in the suburbs! /s
The mythical swing voters, yes, Americans really want to be assfucked by big monied corporations without consent, but just with kinder gentler words and government subsidized lube for the deserving. Crude analogy or no it fits.
We are doomed with these guys in charge and somehow people still trust them.
“moderate” republicans when they see a 99.9% hitler democrat: “why would i pick 99.9% hitler over 100% hitler? 99.9% hitler is still too woke”
Okay, the idea that every single person that vote republican must be some some secret fascist is somewhat wrong, from my perspective it is at least. Don’t get me wrong here, I know people that absolutely do vote like that because they are some of the worst human beings in existence. But there is something that so many of you just don’t understand. For context, I live in pretty much middle of nowhere rural ohio.
The quickest way I can put this since I’m typing this up during break at work, is that a lot of you have no clue just how insufferable the mildest american liberal is if they got dropped in out here.
Democrats continue to be the most spineless fucking eejits in the world.
And the liberals will continue to scream at minorities that we need to unconditionally support them so they can have their brunch and get their TikTok likes.
their real job is to prevent a left opposition and destroy solidarity and they are very, very good at it
Newsom wants to talk about housing costs? lmao
Like he and his friends aren’t the fucking problem.
They always bring up cost of living issues when somebody dares to suggest that maybe we shouldn’t hunt minorities for sport, but ofc that does not mean they will budge an inch on being fiscally to the right of Thatcher.
I feel like if he is actually just tired of the issue he could just get it over with and give trans people rights.
But most of all these ghouls love to talk about how there hey would rather talk about economic issues than pronouns when they really don’t. If they actually wanted to talk about populist economic issues they could just do that. Nobody is interrupting Newsom mid-sentences as he talks about expropriating the landlords.
indeed. not being “bogged down” by these issues is as easy as just extending universal civil rights to exist to everyone, instead of getting out a triangulation device to calculate what civil rights you can deprive which minority groups of and still be viable at the ballot box.
apparently newscum believes he can achieve his goals while purging the trans community and the unhoused.
He believes that because those are key to his goals. He just worries it will make him look bad to RESIST™ Libs if he out right says it
WIthin the next 10 years, we’ll see Democrats looking back on history and labeling Thatcher as ‘too radically left.’
i mean i think they’re already at the point were they have finally convinced themselves you cannot politically afford to let a woman run for president, give the GOP another 3 years of abolishing public schools and the Dems will run on a “surely this time there won’t be bear problems when nobody collects the trash anymore” platform
Yes talk about lowering the value of the only thing people own that has risen in value. They clearly haven’t thought out how to actually do it. And are only saying it because it sounds good.
tbh it was a tactical error from Kamala to keep doing that two-hour speech where she ranked all the pronouns at every rally
Should’ve farmed that out to
that’d be banger contentthinking about that time a protester interrupted her discussion of ‘zir’ and was met with a snappy “I’m speaking”
Wasn’t that against Palestinian protesters?
yea we’re being sarcastic about an alternate universe where Kamala actually stood up for trans rights
Removed by mod
“pronoun pandering shit” you’re talking about real humans who are seriously hurt every single day by a system that refuses to acknowledge their right to exist. It’s not “pandering” it’s a fight for our fucking lives
The regime has been putting women into men’s prisons and is now forcibly detransitioning them. They’re doing conversion therapy experiments on prisoners at this very moment. Women are going to die.
If you give them an inch, they take a mile.
That is shitty too because they will get abused particularly bad in prison, and not protected well. Just out of mean spiritedness on the part of the administration. It’s not like they are just hurting people they have actual opposition from, anyone that falls into the other category they will gleefully hurt them, then slander them to justify it.
“Say the line!”
“The cruelty is the point.”
I think Trans people should have equal and fair rights and be able to get the medical help they need
Well he keeps saying the exact opposite and vetoing bills we put before him. You downplaying his very real transphobia is a form of it by you your self. So I will assume you don’t actually believe that either and tell you to fuck off forever.
These pmc’s seem to think everyone was inconvenienced by pronouns. But it’s like no it was just y’all.
Everybody go and bully this loser
I don’t remember a Democrat mentioning LGBT issues since Biden said there were at least 3 genders. Is he talking about their most popular AOC and Mamdandi or something? They don’t want to soullessly emulate the people who get votes?
Technically they do want to soullessly emulate the people who get votes. They saw how Mamdani got elected on emphasizing affordability issues and now Newsome and his ilk want to glom onto that messaging without actually offering actual solutions to those issues.
There’s a bitter humor in “okay, Mamdani got traction with affordability rhetoric… Let’s see…”
“TRANS ISSUES DON’T MATTER TO POOR PEOPLE!”
Put your hands in the air and step away from the lathe
