I have used Arch for >13 years (btw) and use the terminal every single session. I also work with Linux servers daily, so I tried the other families with DEs (Debian/Ubuntu, RHEL/CentOS/AlmaLinux/Fedora).

I’m comfortable (and prefer) doing everything with CLI tools. For me, it’s a bit difficult to convert my Windows friends, as they all see me as some kind of hackerman.

What’s the landscape like nowadays, in terms of terminal requirements?

Bonus question: Which distribution is the most user-friendly while still updated packages? Does anything provide a similar experience to Arch’s amazing AUR?

  • GaumBeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I choose to use terminal because I can update my software without requiring a restart (I used Debian btw); for some reason, GNOME’s Software app cannot do this without restarting. I also prefer terminal-based text-editing for coding and scripting.

    Depending on use-case, you can absolutely just use the distro without ever touching the terminal. It requires extra work to sift through all the online advice and docs that center around CLI commands though. The Average Windows User won’t be digging that deep in their system to customize the shit out of it like an Arch user, so they won’t need to touch the stuff that can only be accessed via command line. The Above Average Windows User will already be comfortable with the command prompt anyway.

    Which distribution is the most user-friendly while still updated packages?

    All of them? Why would a distro choose to be hostile to its users? (/s)

    I assume you mean “beginner friendly”? In that case, I would stick to Debian: more stability than windows, harder to break than Arch, and lighter-weight than Fedora.

    Those are the only 3 I’ve daily driven in the past couple of years, and that’s my takeaways. I can’t give informed input on any of the popular derivatives, except Ubuntu which I did use for awhile (back in 2014-2016): it was more prone to breaking shit than Debian, less beginner-friendly too (fuck Snaps, and fuck your Pro subscription data-harvesting up-selling bullshit).

  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    over the years i’ve had trouble with the various app stores like Discover and Pop!_Shop which for me led to the use of the terminal. other than that there is the occasional permissions issue that may have a graphical solution but i’ve always used chown on the command line.

  • DreasNil@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve been using Bazzite for a year without ever touching the terminal. I came from Windows.

    • EonNShadow@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Fellow Windows-to-Bazzite migrant here

      I had to use the terminal to address some Nvidia driver weirdness, but aside from that, I really don’t use it much if at all.

      The terminal feels to me like it did on Windows - a useful tool to troubleshoot things - rather than a necessity.

      This is also coming from someone who isn’t uncomfortable using a CLI, but just prefers GUI for my day-to-day tasks.

  • bassgirl09@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yes, generally you can. I run Linux Mint and can count the number of times that I HAD to use the terminal. There are plenty of times where I choose to use the terminal because it’s faster though.

  • Rhotisserie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    So I am a new Linux user (Bazzite) and what I have experienced so far is that for my daily driver use I don’t need the terminal at all. But the moment I want to do anything even slightly more complex, or even just to use a program I want that is not in bazaar, all the user documentation gives me terminal commands.

    So while I am sure it is possible, in reality the terminal still remains prominent and it feels really important to know to use it.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I rarely touch my terminal and do so only because I am already familiar with it. I should use it more. I don’t think its any more necessary to use the terminal in linux than it is in windows for a computer user. I consider zorin the most user friendly and mainly because its out of the box (when its installed it has software already on that fits for most things people want to do with a computer.)

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    It depends.

    A 2-5 year-old laptop, you want to web browse, maybe watch some videos, use google docs or open office, you probably never need a terminal

    If it’s a really new laptop or you want to get the most out of video drivers and push it harder, you’ll probably need to be ready for some light terminal crap. Gets a little janky if you have a dual-video-card setup. Nothing hard to handle, but if you’re not looking to have to handle anything…

    I think the numnber of available packages is better on the Debian side. Mint or Kubuntu run newer hotter stuff, debian runs older more stable stuff.

  • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’d say 90% of usage can be done without the terminal especially if you just use Linux to browse the web or check email or other things that are mundane.

    Anything past that, there is a good chance you’ll have to use the terminal. That said, I think its easier than ever with lots of people making the switch and asking questions on Lemmy or other forums.

  • WereCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    8 days ago

    Can I? Yes. Will I? No.

    Some things are just faster to do via terminal so I learned to use it over GUI for some scenarios.

  • Björn@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    8 days ago

    SUSE has had graphical administration tools for literally decades. Somehow people always forget that.

  • Auster@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 days ago

    Using Linux Mint, most of what I use I could without terminals if I wish. However, just like with Windows, terminal intervention will be needed sooner or later, usually to figure out why a given program isn’t working.

    • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 days ago

      Exactly. You can get away without using the terminal on a lot of linux distros in the same way you can get away without using CMD on Windows… until one very specific thing breaks and suddenly it’s time to run sfc /scannow for the millionth time.

      • Attacker94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I personally don’t understand why that command doesn’t run every time the system starts up by default, I wrote a script that ran it on startup years ago and I can’t tell you how many times it tells me that there were files that needed repairing.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      There’s a sysd GUI that you can use to look at logs. It’s much faster to just refresh the UI than searching your history for the right command

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 days ago

    I cannot vouch for every distro and every use case out there, but for me, yes you can daily drive without having anything to do with terminal. Some distros have worked a lot ensuring this.

    I would recommend to start with Linux Mint.

  • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 days ago

    With Linux Mint you don’t need the terminal 99% of the time. The rest distros are close to 95% of the time. I always suggest Mint to new users.

    • flameleaf@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Last time I set up Mint the only thing I needed the terminal for was to disable a setting on Java 8 that prevented it from launching on Xfce.

      I didn’t need to use the terminal to do that, though. It just didn’t feel right editing a system config file with a GUI text editor.