Hot take: political pluralism is good actually

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m really confused that the libertarian seems to be differing from the Democrats in the meme when Mamdani won the primary and is endorsed by the Democrats. I’m not doubting there are people who typically vote blue who wouldn’t like him (and some might not even vote because of it, or prefer Cuomo), but they certainly don’t fit the stereotypes of the characters on the left in this meme.

      This is just “It’s too late democrats, I’ve depicted you as the foolish soyjak and the libertarians as the noble chad.”

    • Maxxie@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      libertarianism is about how the government should f off (appealing if you’re already rich)

      fascism is about how all power should be vested in a single person who leads everyone towards the will of the nation (appealing if you’re stupid and a bit of a romantic)

      admittedly today’s “libertarians” are often in name only

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        5 days ago

        But how is that in any way compatible with libertarianism?

        I presume not “libertarian” in the old sense of anarchism. Even that doesn’t particularly like electoral politics at all.

        • UnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          I don’t have to agree with everything Mamdani says to realize that the establishment Democrat party is incapable of standing up to this administration. Hence the whole political pluralism thing.

          • stenAanden@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            36
            ·
            5 days ago

            Libertarians are overwhelmingly siding with republicans. Doesn’t that mean anything?

            • UnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 days ago

              Uh no. Does the USSR mean anything when talking to an anarchist?

              Trans rights are human rights Free Palestine. Abolish ICE.

              That any clearer for you?

              • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 days ago

                The Swastika predates Nazi Germany as a symbol for many years, but if you post a flag with a Swastika on it, people are going to assume you mean a Nazi. Once a symbol gets adopted and popularized with a group, it gets associated with that group, regardless of prior meaning.

                • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Nobody but the truly ignorant are going to think you’re a Nazi for flying this, and it’s borderline racist to suggest otherwise

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                20
                ·
                5 days ago

                You use (and say you like) the symbols of a specific political party but then defend yourself saying that you mean the ideology as a whole (and a huge “no true Scotsman”) while criticizing a different specific political party. Maybe don’t use those symbols if you wanna make your point better.