• immobile7801@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    They charge for the blue checkmarks? And…people do it? I haven’t had xitter since years before nazi boy bought it.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes, it was one of the more contreversial changes he did. Before, you had to be “vetted” by xitter staff as being both notable and who you said you were. That wasn’t a great system, and was effectively a nepotism/who you knew game, but you wouldn’t see blue checkmarks for fake accounts.

      It used to be a sign of trustworthiness.

      Now anyone can get one for a monthly fee.

      • dandelion (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        7 days ago

        what I find shocking is that the website still exists and has so many users; I even know a user IRL who hasn’t noticed it has gotten any worse since Elon took over …

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s not for no reason, it allows longer posts, increases visibility and is required to monetize your account. If you care about any of those things (I don’t) you might consider paying for a blue check (I don’t). I’m definitely not the target market.

      • balsoft@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Before, you had to be “vetted” by xitter staff as being both notable and who you said you were.

        This made me think of an easy-ish way to do it for the fediverse:

        1. You must have a Wikidata page, with at least one Wikipedia page associated with that Wikidata page
        2. On the Wikidata page, you must have a P4033 property with that account
        3. Add some ActivityPub metadata for “Account owner’s Wikidata Item”
        4. When there’s a two way correspondance (Fediverse Account <-> Wikidata entry), show a Wikipedia logo which brings you to the corresponding Wikipedia article about the person.
    • monogram@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Unpopular opinion but I think the blue checkmark as a way to show that you support the platform isn’t a bad idea, that it replaced a verification system was the actual issue.

      Voyager shows usernames in purple when they are a contributor to their app.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        the blue checkmark as a way to show that you support the platform isn’t a bad idea

        The premise of how it works is fine, it’s the supporting the platform part that’s the problem