Can’t wait for all the “but I promise DSA is actually a good organization” people to come defend this one. I will apologize for this post only if the DSA kicks him out and revokes all endorsements or support.
They do, of course, have the ability to reject and condemn him for buddying up with Zionists. Denounce and then rethink their strategies because they keep fucking up and cannot do proper internal criticism or vetting of their “electeds” nor their electoral strategu, instead allowing their more liberal members to self-serve through paid electoral posts.
I heard they had a vote for anti-zionism, as in all of DSA. If they were cool, the NYC DSA would be purged or seized by actual anti-zionists since they’re kinda the more lib factions of the DSA.
Can’t wait for all the “but I promise DSA is actually a good organization” people to come defend this one. I will apologize for this post only if the DSA kicks him out and revokes all endorsements or support.
NYCDSA is entertaining a proposal to restrict anti-Mamdani criticism.
I’m not a big DSA fan, but they don’t have a way to prevent him from saying this. I think the reaction from the DSA will show what their stance is.
They do, of course, have the ability to reject and condemn him for buddying up with Zionists. Denounce and then rethink their strategies because they keep fucking up and cannot do proper internal criticism or vetting of their “electeds” nor their electoral strategu, instead allowing their more liberal members to self-serve through paid electoral posts.
I heard they had a vote for anti-zionism, as in all of DSA. If they were cool, the NYC DSA would be purged or seized by actual anti-zionists since they’re kinda the more lib factions of the DSA.
Oh even the anti-Zionist proposal passed with assurances that it wouldn’t be used outside of extreme circumstances after much process.